2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Parallel vs Series Fuel Rails?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-08, 10:29 AM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Parallel vs Series Fuel Rails?

I've seen most of the write-ups for fuel systems switch the fuel flow through each of the rails from a parallel to a series flow setup, but what is the reason for doing this? Is it just for a more even distribution of pressure between the rails? Does it help to dampen out pressure fluctuations more? It seems like the parallel setup may be more likely to have problems though, in case one of the rails becomes plugged, theres a greater restriction in one than the other, or a line gets kinked then the majority of the fuel will pass through the other, starving the one for flow. Has anyone noticed (or solved) fuel issues by going with one setup over the other?
Old 08-15-08, 02:48 PM
  #2  
My girl

iTrader: (3)
 
Houstonderk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Andrews AFB, MD
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Only thing I've seen is that the parallel is used for higher hp since the stock series rail setup goes to about 500hp.
Old 08-15-08, 03:25 PM
  #3  
Retired Moderator, RIP

iTrader: (142)
 
misterstyx69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes on 114 Posts
TED,(Reted) has a Nice little Write up on his FC3S.org site.,,show some Fuel rail diagrams and what not..
Old 08-15-08, 03:46 PM
  #4  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I know, thats where I first saw the parallel setup a while back, but IIRC his site doesnt really give any reasons why it would be beneficial to switch to that type of setup.
Old 08-15-08, 04:51 PM
  #5  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
i think people run paralell setups in higher hp aplications so that when the bigger injectors come online, you dont get lean spots. i have a paralell setup and i like it.
Old 08-15-08, 05:15 PM
  #6  
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.

iTrader: (3)
 
classicauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hagersville Ontario
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
^^That's the main reason^^

But I don't really have any data to contest that as I made the parallel mod for my own personal reasons (because I wanted to get the hang of doing AN fittings)

But the "theory" is with larger secondaries (1600's, not those little 720's ) in a series system they may not have adequate flow behind them to fill the large hole an open 1600 creates. but with the feed split to both primary and secondary, it becomes easier.

but like I said, I have no real data.......my honest guess after years of running the parallel system is that a series stock style system would work very well, I just have no idea at which point (fuel flow or horsepower) the series system starts to lack.
Old 08-15-08, 06:05 PM
  #7  
Who Shot the Sheriff?

iTrader: (2)
 
Turbo II Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Parallel systems are also nice for dual pumps so you don't have to T the lines together. I went this direction for my 13b-re.
Old 08-15-08, 06:08 PM
  #8  
My girl

iTrader: (3)
 
Houstonderk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Andrews AFB, MD
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
^^Don't they usually just tie it in the tank anyways so it can go out the one outlet? Unless you weld another outlet I guess.
Old 08-15-08, 07:08 PM
  #9  
Who Shot the Sheriff?

iTrader: (2)
 
Turbo II Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
People usually do but I'm running dual bosch 044's with divided lines that meet at the FPR. I don't like the idea of tying them together just to split them back apart before the rails.
Old 08-16-08, 11:12 AM
  #10  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Ok, thanks for the responses. I've only got 1000cc's for the secondaries and havent had a problem with them in the stock series configuration, so I think i'll keep it that way when I put in the new FPR. my plans arent THAT big for this car anyway, just a nice healthy 250-300 at the wheels.

Classic, doesnt the 2ndary rail come after the primary in terms of fuel flow? In that case, only one of the 2ndary injectors would be seeing this "void", which would be the same as if it were a parallel setup. If you had ridiculously large primaries and secondaries it would seem to make sense to do a parallel setup, but with smaller primaries it shouldnt make a difference (and because of flow losses, the primaries would see a higher pressure than the secondaries anyway, so you could in theory flow a little bit more fuel to the engine for a given injector size).
Old 08-17-08, 12:08 AM
  #11  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by toplessFC3Sman
Ok, thanks for the responses. I've only got 1000cc's for the secondaries and havent had a problem with them in the stock series configuration, so I think i'll keep it that way when I put in the new FPR. my plans arent THAT big for this car anyway, just a nice healthy 250-300 at the wheels.

Classic, doesnt the 2ndary rail come after the primary in terms of fuel flow? In that case, only one of the 2ndary injectors would be seeing this "void", which would be the same as if it were a parallel setup. If you had ridiculously large primaries and secondaries it would seem to make sense to do a parallel setup, but with smaller primaries it shouldnt make a difference (and because of flow losses, the primaries would see a higher pressure than the secondaries anyway, so you could in theory flow a little bit more fuel to the engine for a given injector size).
are you running stock ecu? the stock ecu ( i think rtek as well) fires the primaries and secondaries after a certain rpm.

hm... your running a stand alone. just do the parallel man. its not a problem duders.
Old 08-18-08, 11:03 AM
  #12  
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.

iTrader: (3)
 
classicauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hagersville Ontario
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by toplessFC3Sman
Classic, doesnt the 2ndary rail come after the primary in terms of fuel flow? In that case, only one of the 2ndary injectors would be seeing this "void", which would be the same as if it were a parallel setup. If you had ridiculously large primaries and secondaries it would seem to make sense to do a parallel setup, but with smaller primaries it shouldnt make a difference (and because of flow losses, the primaries would see a higher pressure than the secondaries anyway, so you could in theory flow a little bit more fuel to the engine for a given injector size).
Like I said, I don't really know haha
Old 08-18-08, 11:22 AM
  #13  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
I ran 21psi on a T04S 60-1 with fuel lines in series no problem, 720/1680 with rewired Supra TT pump. The stainless parallel fuel system mod is nice, but IMO not "necessary" to keep your fuel pressure from dropping off, although I would recommend an aftermarket FPR for consistent fuel pressure under all levels of engine load. And injector staging is mostly a function of the way you have tuned your EMS.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
11-15-17 08:44 AM



Quick Reply: Parallel vs Series Fuel Rails?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 PM.