2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Pacesetter VS racing beat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 10:23 PM
  #1  
Jackintheb0x214's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Pacesetter VS racing beat

I drive an 87 fc n/a and i want to get a set of rb headers, but someone i know has a set of pacesetters and is selling them relatively cheap. My only dilema is that i want to get the most out of my car, price difference between the two is not an issue. The person told me that there will not be any considerable difference between the two but not sure if thats just a sales tactic. So i need your help guys...
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 10:30 PM
  #2  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
if the price is a huge difference get the pacesetters. both that set and the racing beat aren't that great, despite Racing Beat's name in rotaries and performance their headers were never really refined all that well.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 11:02 PM
  #3  
BrettLinton7's Avatar
Lots of rotors
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,401
Likes: 75
From: North GA
Originally Posted by Jackintheb0x214
I drive an 87 fc n/a and i want to get a set of rb headers, but someone i know has a set of pacesetters and is selling them relatively cheap. My only dilema is that i want to get the most out of my car, price difference between the two is not an issue. The person told me that there will not be any considerable difference between the two but not sure if thats just a sales tactic. So i need your help guys...
I have had both of these headers on my car, and I can say my *** dyno couldn't tell a bit of difference over the Pacesetter or RacingBeat header. Quality wise I would go with the RB, but with that you'll need the RB presilencer so that you can bolt up to your existing catback. With the Pacesetter header, it fits right in place of the stock header and 2 pre-cats. I've heard of OBX headers recently too, they seem to be about the same quality as Pacesetter and should be cheap too. I can't vouch on their quality, though.

I would however recommend the complete RB system if you were seriously looking for a good quality exhaust. My latest FC has it and it puts a smile on my face everytime the tach rises...
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 03:56 AM
  #4  
Derekcat's Avatar
Rotary Zealot!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 2
From: Milwaukie, Or
Like Brett says, RB quality is awesome.

And again like he says, you need the whole system [I can promise you, for a long time I had a RB header+presilencer with the stock catback.... And when I finally got the RB catback it was a world of difference ]
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 08:21 AM
  #5  
Jackintheb0x214's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Do i have to run a cat? We dont have emissions testing here in KS so all my previous cars have run catless. Will i need the backpressure created by a cat or can i straight pipe it after the header? I have a turbo II catback exhaust that i will put on when i get the header? Also, how important/neccesary is the presilencer?
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 10:13 AM
  #6  
jaydun323's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: LRAFB AR
The presilencer is only needed if you don't care about noise pollution tickets. It's good for creating a bit quieter and milder exhaust tone. Also the cats are not needed for emissions free states.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 11:18 AM
  #7  
Jackintheb0x214's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
I am not worried about noise pollution. I just didnt know if not having the presilencer would affect 6th port actuation at all since they operate using back pressure
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 12:07 PM
  #8  
jaydun323's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: LRAFB AR
Yes and No, the 86-88 racing beat presilencer has a pick up tube for the 5th and 6th port actuators. RX7 1986-1992: Exhaust - Headers: Presilencer - 86-88 RX-7 Non-turbo - Man Trans -
But if you go with a straight pipe setup just make sure you get the 86-88 header that also has the pickup tube. RX7 1986-1992: Exhaust - Headers: Road Race Header - 86-88 RX-7 -
Hope that helps,
Justin
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 02:03 PM
  #9  
Jackintheb0x214's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
I was just looking at those. I think ill go with the header that has the pick up tube. Save me money and will make it a ta bit louder. Thanks for all the help guys, very helpful
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 04:01 PM
  #10  
Derekcat's Avatar
Rotary Zealot!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 2
From: Milwaukie, Or
I'd say to forget about exhaust back pressure to actuate the ports...
I feel it's MUCH better to use the air pump's pressure, you'll be able to control the opening point and verify operation while parked. Using exhaust back pressure you have to drive the car or put it on a dyno to get the ports to actuate..

All you need is some plumbing from HomeDepot [or wherever] to make a T. One end steps down to a barbed fitting for the vacuum hose, one has a valve that dumps to air [or step downs to whatever size provides the correct opening timing] and the third one goes to the output of the airpump.

Attached is the original version of mine. [Do NOT buy that fake-steel braided hose from the HomeDepot plumbing section... It will melt >_> ]
Attached Thumbnails Pacesetter VS racing beat-dscf2709.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 10:10 AM
  #11  
Jackintheb0x214's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
That thing looks soo steampunk
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 12:28 PM
  #12  
ScrapFC's Avatar
Emerald Triangle for life
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
I would never put anything Pacesetter on my car. Their headers sound like absolute ***. Their primaries aren't equal. Their "collectors" are total fail. I have heard of people switching to Pacesetter from the stock manifold an LOSING power. Racing Beat could be better than they are, but their stuff works pretty well and it sounds amazingly good.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 02:49 PM
  #13  
tuscanidream's Avatar
T2 Duo!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 3
From: RI/CT
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by BrettLinton7
I've heard of OBX headers recently too, they seem to be about the same quality as Pacesetter and should be cheap too. I can't vouch on their quality, though.
F*&% OBShit. While I can't comment on the quality of their products for the rx7, I was very disappointed on their header for my gk tiburon.

Had no primary O2 bung (the important one)
Header was 6 inches to short to meeting the mid-pipe
Flange to the mid-pipe wasn't welded straight (twisted)
Stainless steel... what grade because it was starting to rust out while my stainless steel exhaust from Seoulful Racing looking like a ******* mirror when I sold the car

I would probably never buy anything from them again even if the product was legit. I think the "R" they put on their products stands for Retarded.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 03:39 PM
  #14  
Jackintheb0x214's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Is there a header thats better than rb? Rb headers are bery popular here. If there is a header that is better, i want to get that one. I will be running a header with a pick up tube and straight back to a turbo II catback which are essentially straight pipe themselves
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 03:41 PM
  #15  
devilxavierz's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Irving TX
just get RB....you cant go wrong with that or go fab your own one
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 06:15 PM
  #16  
Molotovman's Avatar
Ban Peak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 549
From: Northern Virginia
I've had a pacesetter header for 6 years. No issues.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 06:48 PM
  #17  
marclong's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Jefferson , Ga
Had my pacesetter for 13 years now. Sounds great with racing beat presilencer y pipe and rb mufflers. But my car has seen rain maybe 3 times in those years. Racing beat is a heavier guage steel.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 08:49 PM
  #18  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 932
From: CA
I have had a couple of friends at Auto-x with the Pacesetter headers and I agree they are complete crap as well.

They sound horrible from thin wall tube and unequal length and one friends actually cracked one of the runners in half.

I am not super enamored of Racing Beat quality either concerning their welds, choice of materials and design. I have owned several RB exhaust components.

I would try Corksport.

It might sound a little tiny from thin wall stainless tube, but it looks to have nice TIG welds, equal length with decent merge, fits to the stock cat, has instructions and even a dyno chart on the site.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 01:17 PM
  #19  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Mindtrain used to make a header that trumped racing beat, but they are no longer in business that i know of.

Defined Autoworks also puts a chunk of time into actually testing and developing the exhaust but they are also about the priciest exhaust you will find.


there's an old saying "you get what you pay for" and the rule still applies. Pacesetter is the lowest quality, probably lower than OBX but should still give minimal gains similar to OBX. OBX is crap quality as well because their stainless is likely 304 which isn't very good for strength or corrosion resistance compared to other much higher quality stainless. Racing beat uses much higher quality materials and will take a bit more abuse but as far as i'm concerned there was no R+D put into it for power gains to be maximised, so if you are looking for the best then you're looking in the wrong place. Mindtrain used to make a simple header that put out about 7whp more than the RB(stock series 5 n/a) unit but it was constructed of basic steel finish, not the best of quality but it did perform better than the rest to date. Defined AW bench and chassis test the exhaust but they are also multiples in cost comparatively to the rest and can probably tune the headers for your particular application if you have deep enough pockets.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; Aug 13, 2012 at 01:25 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 06:25 PM
  #20  
djSL's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 135
From: Duluth, MN
I currently have the entire RB system minus the pre-silencer for an 88 NA S4. Sound is nice; has a quiet idle and low rpm tone, when you open it up though it gets loud as hell. Quality is very good from what I have inspected. My only drawback to the system is that I've heard the piping diameter will be too small for a turbo setup, if you ever go that route (I could be way off base). This means you will have to scrap the exhaust for one that flows a bit more freely. Good thing it came with the car when I bought it
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 06:36 PM
  #21  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
yes, turbo needs more diameter where non turbo engines need the scavenging effect from the exhaust to tune the powerband.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 08:14 PM
  #22  
marclong's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Jefferson , Ga
My pacesetter has no "tinny sound" . Your buddy is probably running a gutted cat or thin walled "test pipe".
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 08:17 PM
  #23  
marclong's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Jefferson , Ga
Not saying its the best quality. But its certainly not crap. If your buddy has sound issues it is more than likely an exhaust leak from a poor installation.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 08:21 PM
  #24  
MIDNFauciUSN's Avatar
Roll FIS green
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,738
Likes: 14
From: Jax, FL
I've had both. There is a definite difference in weight, with the RB being obviously heavier. On an NA, I doubt you'd see a difference in power though.

When your exhaust is already 123112 dB, whats a little more?
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.