2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Opinions on turbocharging a N/A 6 port

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 05:45 PM
  #1  
LS1FC's Avatar
Thread Starter
LSX7
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Opinions on turbocharging a N/A 6 port

Ive heard only a few reasons as to why you should or shouldnt turbocharge a N/A. Some support the idea while others have their doubts. I personally am thinking of taking on the endeavor and rebuilding my 6 port, turbo ready. Anyone here in the forum tried this or have opinions in either direction, I would be very interested to hear them. Im of the opinion that a 6 port motor has a wider power band and high compression rotors, making for a totally bad *** platform for a turbo. Also, I found out from a reliable mazda shop that the turbo motor has the same exact apex seals as a N/A. Im interested to hear your comments!
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
SpeedRacer's Avatar
Formula Mazda Driver
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon, USA
Higher compression is bad for turbos. Higher compression won't be able to boost as much without blowing.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 06:57 PM
  #3  
Mykl's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, Al.
Higher compression only means that you can't run super high boost. Six port engines seem to do fine with a supercharger, I don't see how a turbo would be any different.

If you do it right ($$$), I forsee no problems. However, doing it right would include the following....

Custom turbo manifold, the stock Turbo II manifold doesn't leave enough clearance for the turbo to fit with the six port intake.

Decent turbo

Aftermarket ECU (Haltech) with fuel system components. I'm not sure how well the stock n/a ECU deals with boost.

Other than that all you really need is some piping and a few other bits here and there. Those are just the main things.

Overall, you'd probably be better off going with a Jap-spec turbo engine and just dropping it in. It would be way more cost effective.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 07:01 PM
  #4  
LS1FC's Avatar
Thread Starter
LSX7
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Well.....You can easily solve a high compression problem by installing the low compression turbo rotors. If you went with the high compression rotors you would need to increase fuel delivery and possibly retard the timing...Just my thoughts.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 07:21 PM
  #5  
turboconv's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, NS, Canada
I've been running a na engine turbocharged for a few years; yes I have had growing pains (ie BOOM) but seem to have the problems worked out and have a very driveable setup now. I think as long as you are not going over 10 psi boost a na is the answer because the higher compression rotors give you a little more power off the line.

Just my two cents from my experience
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 17, 2015 09:22 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM
Joe's_7
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Sep 8, 2015 04:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 PM.