2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

OEM intercooler and NA hood?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-09, 11:57 PM
  #26  
Full Member

 
sim_rx3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
The air-liquid intercooler isn't such a great idea for the average forum member.
dont understand why it isnt a great idea. in alot of cases with what ive described is cheaper than an aftermarket FMIC kit.

Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
An air-liquid intercooler is really intended for applications in which an air-air intercooler will not fit well.
totally disagree. in a road application where heat soak is an issue. (especially in traffic) where your sitting for long periods of time.
the air to air option offers nothing in the line of cooling and air intake temps rise considerly.. especially in summer.

where a water to air atleast works towards keeping intake temps down.

the only time id consider air to air is if the car is rare and its fitted from factory (like my car - Luce. link in signiture) to which im sorting on my car by hidden water injection or i would have been going the water to air route.
my rx3 with a 12appt being a road car is going water to air intercooler with a PWR setup as it will be a show car as well. so i wanted everything to look top notch.

Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Also, an air-air intercooler core is not the greatest design for use in an air-liquid intercooler application which works better with a properly designed core.
this is true but were not chasing the last millisecond on the strip or circuit racing. its a unit designed to do the job and get it done.


pro's and cons -

for

more consistant intake temps
less peak intake temps
easier to install as pipe lines are small as aposed to air to air pipes
should make an engine more reliable due to less heat stresses

against

installation heavier than air to air
fabrication work needed (but thats with air to air as well)




we have done it over here (austrailia) and seems to work ok.. plus you definetly do feel a difference during the day from air to air to water to air in traffic.

cheers
Old 01-15-09, 02:37 AM
  #27  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by sim_rx3
dont understand why it isnt a great idea. in alot of cases with what ive described is cheaper than an aftermarket FMIC kit.
It is also cheaper to cut your hair yourself, but I don't see too many movie stars choosing that option.

Originally Posted by sim_rx3
totally disagree. in a road application where heat soak is an issue. (especially in traffic) where your sitting for long periods of time.
the air to air option offers nothing in the line of cooling and air intake temps rise considerly.. especially in summer.
Both types of intercooler use a heat exchanger which can be prone to heat soak. Both types of intercooler can be fitted with a fan if necessary. Besides, I am not sure how you drive in Australia, but most Americans do not boost to 15psi while sitting in rush hour traffic.

If you have trouble with the technical side of the issue, you can just look at the intercooler choices of the major automotive manufacturers and various race car classes to see where each type of intercooler tends to work well for a given application.
Old 01-15-09, 04:30 AM
  #28  
I fix planes...

 
Mutaku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Murica
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the end it really does come down to application, each one has its advantages and what not.
Old 01-15-09, 06:38 PM
  #29  
Full Member

 
sim_rx3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
It is also cheaper to cut your hair yourself, but I don't see too many movie stars choosing that option.


Both types of intercooler use a heat exchanger which can be prone to heat soak. Both types of intercooler can be fitted with a fan if necessary. Besides, I am not sure how you drive in Australia, but most Americans do not boost to 15psi while sitting in rush hour traffic.

If you have trouble with the technical side of the issue, you can just look at the intercooler choices of the major automotive manufacturers and various race car classes to see where each type of intercooler tends to work well for a given application.
you dont need to spend big dollars in road aplications as your not chasing millisecond. you just want something that works and looks neat.

its not about how you drive or boost levels. a water to air system set up like i have stated will combate heat soak alot better than air to air and work better as i have state in my previous post..

not everyone has to be sheep and do what the rest does. if something works then why not really?

i was just trying to help so take it as you will..
Old 01-15-09, 09:00 PM
  #30  
Full Member
 
ACE0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utica, NY
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what is the actual consensus on this? will a stock hood work with an OEM intercooler? I know it's not the optimal setup but will it work well and not break anything? Because I just realized that the car I'm probably buying is a GXL with a S5 TII and still has the stock hood and intercooler.
Old 01-16-09, 12:32 AM
  #31  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by ACE0000
Because I just realized that the car I'm probably buying is a GXL with a S5 TII and still has the stock hood and intercooler.
How long has the previous owner been driving the car in that condition?
Old 01-16-09, 01:29 AM
  #32  
Full Member
 
ACE0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utica, NY
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
How long has the previous owner been driving the car in that condition?
I actually don't know I will have to ask him, I know the engine only has about 30k miles on it, but I don't know if it was new when he put it in or not.
Old 01-16-09, 03:20 AM
  #33  
I fix planes...

 
Mutaku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Murica
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basically since the top mount never was getting any airflow it would just stay hot thus completely negating it purpose. I am not sure if it would end up heating the intake air but it would not be cooling. Hot air means the car is more subject to detonation.
Old 01-16-09, 01:13 PM
  #34  
Full Member
 
ACE0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utica, NY
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mutaku - Rotary Powa!
Basically since the top mount never was getting any airflow it would just stay hot thus completely negating it purpose. I am not sure if it would end up heating the intake air but it would not be cooling. Hot air means the car is more subject to detonation.
So I'm thinking one of the first mods I should do is to get a TII hood? or possibly some type of aftermarket hood.
Old 01-16-09, 06:25 PM
  #35  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by ACE0000
I actually don't know I will have to ask him, I know the engine only has about 30k miles on it, but I don't know if it was new when he put it in or not.
If the car has a lot of miles driving in that condition, then it is probably OK to drive it like that for a little longer if you keep the boost level down to a minimum. However, I personally would be very cautious about buying a car in this condition because it indicates the previous owner was broke and/or not very smart when it comes to cars.

Originally Posted by ACE0000
So I'm thinking one of the first mods I should do is to get a TII hood? or possibly some type of aftermarket hood.
Yes, or a front-mount intercooler. A stock TII hood would be the cheapest and easiest solution, and the steel TII hoods are especially cheap.
Old 01-16-09, 10:26 PM
  #36  
Full Member
 
ACE0000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utica, NY
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
If the car has a lot of miles driving in that condition, then it is probably OK to drive it like that for a little longer if you keep the boost level down to a minimum. However, I personally would be very cautious about buying a car in this condition because it indicates the previous owner was broke and/or not very smart when it comes to cars.
I'm willing to bet he ran out of money because he even said it's basically an incomplete project but just about everything is done except finishing touches such as an aftermarket exhaust so I'm assuming the hood was one of the finishing touches he didn't get to. I am definitely going to ask him a whole lot of questions before I buy it though that is why I've been on here asking so many questions and researching.

Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Yes, or a front-mount intercooler. A stock TII hood would be the cheapest and easiest solution, and the steel TII hoods are especially cheap.
I am thinking of maybe a TII OEM replacement Carbon Fiber hood since I might be getting one anyways in the future and I've got a little extra money to spend on it if there are any little things that need to be fixed, as long as there aren't too many and I know what they are.
Old 05-06-09, 01:04 AM
  #37  
Shpee

iTrader: (6)
 
JCurry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tx
Posts: 1,948
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wat about running the stock IC with a n/a hood, and not boosting at all untill i front mount or get another TII hood...im talking no boosting at all??
Old 05-06-09, 06:31 PM
  #38  
I have a rotary addiction

Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
NCross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Columbia, Tennessee
Posts: 4,815
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Well... that was 4 months ago...
Old 05-06-09, 07:33 PM
  #39  
Former FC enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
KhanArtisT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,841
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It is not a clearance issue, the hood will close fine. If you're not boosting it will be fine.

BTW, before getting the T2 hood setup you should calculate the costs of everything. I payed $225 for a hood and $300 for paint matching. Talk about a bad investment. I could've gotten an FMIC setup and a battery re-location, or a carbon fiber hood for the weight savings.
Old 05-06-09, 10:47 PM
  #40  
The waiting game......

iTrader: (18)
 
2slow4stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Aurora
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Yeah, but I cut the stock hood and made it look decent. I personally think it's hideous but others like it. But yeah, you do need some sort of air, or it'll be horrible. I've done it then cut a hole. All I spent was $5 for the cutting disc and I had fiberglass and bondo laying around. I still need to finish it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
12-08-15 01:45 PM



Quick Reply: OEM intercooler and NA hood?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.