2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

New Tach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2002 | 11:46 PM
  #26  
riffraff's Avatar
smog nazi destroyer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: california
and RETed. i think that aftermarket tachs, well good ones atleast, are more accurate than that.. i tell you, i would not feel very confident in my tach if it read 500 rpm under were i really was.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2002 | 11:46 PM
  #27  
dre_2ooo's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally posted by riffraff
on my streetport , when racing, i usualy shift around 7500-8000rpm..

if you shift at 4k, then what is the point of having any power, because you are barely (if that) reaching your power band. when racing, you want to keep in your power band as much as possible. that generally means shifting after your peak power, so that you end up starting the next gear in the meaty part of your power band ( as junx said)
That's what I'm thinking, so why is Ted saying

"What you should be trying to do is hit the peak torque"

??????
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2002 | 11:50 PM
  #28  
riffraff's Avatar
smog nazi destroyer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: california
because he probably does not know what he is talking about. just hitting your peak torque will get you nowhere in a race...

now, if you want to stay out of your power band, for say gas economy purposes, then your peak torque might be the place to look.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2002 | 11:50 PM
  #29  
bingoboy's Avatar
Lava Surfer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
From: Kailua, HI
nice tach bud. why the rest look so dark though. washed out?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2002 | 11:56 PM
  #30  
dre_2ooo's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally posted by riffraff
because he probably does not know what he is talking about. just hitting your peak torque will get you nowhere in a race...

now, if you want to stay out of your power band, for say gas economy purposes, then your peak torque might be the place to look.
Yeah Ted is a pretty smart guy... which is what brings the confusion

Probably something lost in communication here, we all must not be on the same page.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2002 | 11:57 PM
  #31  
riffraff's Avatar
smog nazi destroyer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: california
probably not.. since i too have heard good things about him
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2002 | 12:00 AM
  #32  
My Junx's Avatar
Rotary Father
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Oh, yeah I forgot, the whole point of this thread!.....that is a nice tach. But I'll say again, fewer shifts at higher power will get you MUCH lower ETs than more shifts at higher torque.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2002 | 12:04 AM
  #33  
RX7Kid's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton,OR
The pic cinda sucks but heah its a new camera i am still getting yous to it
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2002 | 07:11 AM
  #34  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by riffraff
because he probably does not know what he is talking about.
Ted has probably forgotten more than you know...

Ted didn't say "shift at peak torque", he said "what you should be trying to do is hit the peak torque", as in when you change gear, the revs drop to around where peak torque is. Peak acceleration in each gear occurs at peak torque, so it should be obvious why you'd want to be around there.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2002 | 07:40 AM
  #35  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
If you have a dyno plot of your car, find the highest point of the curve. You want the RPMs to fall near it when you upshift. I've never revved the **** out of my cars like people on here seem to want to do...
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2002 | 11:29 AM
  #36  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Boy, turn around and people question your statements...

Dyno your car...you'll see where your peak torque pops up at.&nbsp This is usually around 3kRPM to 5kRPM - notice the wide discrepency for most streetport vehicles.

You want to shift, so that when you get back on the gas, the revs are exactly where the peak torque it.&nbsp This is typically 2kRPM to 2.5kRPM higher than the peak torque is.&nbsp Think about it...peak torque is where you get the absolute most acceleration.&nbsp Torque causes acceleration NOT horsepower.&nbsp It would be easy to surmise that if you want to accelerate the quickest, you want to start where you got the most torque.

All you NA guys revving up to redline and shifting are NOT optimizing your acceleration.&nbsp Don't believe me?&nbsp Dyno the car, find peak torque, and start changing your shift points...

Like Felix Wankel said, I don't understand revving overly high for no reason either...



-Ted
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2002 | 12:28 PM
  #37  
dre_2ooo's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
OK Thanks

So I should be shifting about 6000-6500 RPMs then?

Just curious if anyone knows the shift points that'll do this on a streetport with stock internals and gearing....
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2002 | 02:57 PM
  #38  
riffraff's Avatar
smog nazi destroyer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: california
problem is that on a streetport engine, at 6k you are maybe mid way in your power band. so you are not really taking advantage of that extra power... when i first got my seven i tried shifting at about 6.5k while racing, and got my *** kicked.. then, with out changing anything else, i waited until 7.5k to 8k so to shift... suddenly i was the one kicking ***.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Thor 18
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
Sep 28, 2015 07:35 PM
Casual_John
Canadian Forum
4
Sep 26, 2015 01:47 PM
subeone
General Rotary Tech Support
0
Sep 24, 2015 09:58 PM
befarrer
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
3
Sep 22, 2015 09:33 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM.