2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

NA and turbo II drivetrain differences: documentation and pictures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-04, 12:52 AM
  #1  
Lives on the Forum

Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
NA and turbo II drivetrain differences: documentation and pictures

Pics will load, theyre just slow. For now this writeup is hosted on my web server, later it will be integrated into the website tech area, so dont bookmark it just yet.

www.rotaryresurrection.com/klinternetfiles/na-t2drivetrain.htm
Old 10-04-04, 12:53 AM
  #2  
Ryu
1991 Frankin7 ***RIP***

 
Ryu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
awesome, glad to see some pics and info on this for once. up till now its all been alot of "he said, she said" kinda info about these trannies.
Old 10-04-04, 06:29 AM
  #3  
Lava Surfer

 
bingoboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kailua, HI
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
doh, so if i have a t2 drivetrain on hand, i can't use it with my upgraded NA clutch and pp

oh well at least i know i have to find another.
Old 10-04-04, 09:24 AM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
wozzoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Conyngham, PA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Kevin,
Great write-up. Thanks for the time and effort.

Just one thing I'd like to point out that wasn't discussed: The NA Automatic driveshaft. The Automatic driveshaft has the the same splines as the the Turbo transmission but has the bolt pattern of the NA rear diff.

So using the Automatic driveshaft allows for a hybrid installation of a Turbo Transmission with an NA rear end. This isn't the best way to go for delivering Turbo power to the wheels, but is an option for those who have 4.3 gears in the rear.
Old 10-04-04, 10:03 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: miami florida
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does The 87-88 Turbo Trannies Bolt Up To The Thr S5 Turbo Engine With No Modifications?>???
Old 10-04-04, 10:05 AM
  #6  
777** The Anti-rice

 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.
Originally Posted by crazyassrx7
?>???
Old 10-04-04, 10:15 AM
  #7  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by wozzoom
Just one thing I'd like to point out that wasn't discussed: The NA Automatic driveshaft. The Automatic driveshaft has the the same splines as the the Turbo transmission but has the bolt pattern of the NA rear diff.

So using the Automatic driveshaft allows for a hybrid installation of a Turbo Transmission with an NA rear end. This isn't the best way to go for delivering Turbo power to the wheels, but is an option for those who have 4.3 gears in the rear.
Since the Automatic transmission is longer than the Manual transmissions, the Automatic driveshaft is 2" shorter, and trying to use it in this manner is dangerous.

See more comparisons here:
http://www.16paws.com/rx7/index.html
Old 10-04-04, 10:57 AM
  #8  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Correct, it's fine for if you ABSOLUTELY must move the vehicle/drive it to/from work, but under no circumstance should you even think about beating on it.
Old 10-04-04, 11:09 AM
  #9  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,965
Received 54 Likes on 44 Posts
Great writeup esp. the pics. Should answer a lot of questions that keep coming to the surface.
Thanks for the time!!!!
Old 10-04-04, 11:20 AM
  #10  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've heard this said on the forums numerous times and wanted to know if there is any truth to it. It's been said that an aftermarket flywheel meant for a turbo will work with the N/A tranny if you use a TII pressure plate, or something like that. Is this true?
Old 10-04-04, 12:18 PM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
wozzoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Conyngham, PA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Since the Automatic transmission is longer than the Manual transmissions, the Automatic driveshaft is 2" shorter, and trying to use it in this manner is dangerous.

See more comparisons here:
http://www.16paws.com/rx7/index.html
Good link. I've heard of people using the automatic shaft with the turbo trans...They must have had a custom shaft made.
Old 10-04-04, 12:50 PM
  #12  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by wozzoom
Good link. I've heard of people using the automatic shaft with the turbo trans...They must have had a custom shaft made.
No, they are just idiots, I'm sorry to say. The factory service manual quite plainly shows the length difference.

Mazdatrix makes a custom driveshaft that mates a TII transmission to a NA differential, and sells for about the same price as a regular NA or TII driveshaft.
http://www.mazdatrix.com/getprice.asp?partnum=2691-000

Originally Posted by dDuB
I've heard this said on the forums numerous times and wanted to know if there is any truth to it. It's been said that an aftermarket flywheel meant for a turbo will work with the N/A tranny if you use a TII pressure plate, or something like that. Is this true?
I don't think that would work because the TII flywheel has a larger diameter, and even if it fit in the NA bellhousing, the starter wouldn't engage it correctly. There may be some way to compensate for the larger-diameter flywheel, but I don't know about it. I think it's just a lot easier to use the proper flywheel rather than try to rig things to work.
Old 10-04-04, 01:44 PM
  #13  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes that's my thinking too, but I've heard it said on this board far too many times and just wanted some clarification from someone that knows for sure.
Old 10-04-04, 02:36 PM
  #14  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
You might want to mention the turbo clutch fork is thicker and directly swaps for the non-turbo unit.
"Clutch fork upgrade" for your non-turbo manual trans.
Credit goes to hIGGI for figuring this out.


-Ted
Old 10-04-04, 04:50 PM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
andrew lohaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: fl
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what would be the benefit of just swaping the forks?
Old 10-04-04, 04:55 PM
  #16  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
DerangedHermit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN 37916
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by andrew lohaus
what would be the benefit of just swaping the forks?
Stronger clutch fork....
Old 10-04-04, 04:56 PM
  #17  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
A more durable and stronger clutch fork?
I've seen non-turbo clutch forks bend and crack.
...to strong of a pressure plate upgrade?


-Ted
Old 10-04-04, 08:41 PM
  #18  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (7)
 
sub9lulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 2,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
love u kevin
Old 10-05-04, 01:00 AM
  #19  
Lets rock.

 
flamin-roids's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok if this helps any. I did a 5 speed swap on my '89 GXL. I went with all TII components (slave cyl, Light flywheel w/ auto counterwieght, TII trans, TII shaft, auto rear end) but when I lined up the TII shaft with the N/A rear I lined it up perfectly and drilled new holes for the larger shaft. However when you do this it puts the holes very close to the edge of the flange. But it worked perfectly.
Old 10-06-04, 11:19 AM
  #20  
S4 now S6 soon...

 
FDreaming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bonney lake, WA
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is a question, I was just looking through the standard features thread, and I noticed the Convertable tranny has some different ratios(namely 5th) anyone know if it's layout on the inside is any different, or is it the same NA tranny with one different gear? Might be good to know for the people that have already spent money on an NA flywheel/clutch.
Old 10-06-04, 11:31 AM
  #21  
Lives on the Forum

Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
ALL of the NA trannies regardless of model or gear ratios, are the same gearbox. Common misconceptions are that the factory sport models (88 GTU, 89-90 GTUs) have turbo drivetrains, this is NOT true. All nonturbos have the standard smoothcase transmission which is just as weak...just different ratios sometimes exist.
Old 10-06-04, 12:05 PM
  #22  
13B N/A POWA!

 
KiyoKix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Everywhere, WRLD
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know the difference in weight of the TII tranny to the N/A tranny?

Kiyo
Old 10-06-04, 12:09 PM
  #23  
Mountain Rotary Mod

 
Parastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Freaking Poland!!
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awesome writeup! Very informative!
While i still plan on using my NA drivetrain on my project, I will probably start to pick up turbo parts when i have some extra cash.

....after my rebuild project is complete of course!
Old 10-06-04, 12:11 PM
  #24  
Eat, sleep, work, mod.

 
jon88se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
ALL of the NA trannies regardless of model or gear ratios, are the same gearbox. Common misconceptions are that the factory sport models (88 GTU, 89-90 GTUs) have turbo drivetrains, this is NOT true. All nonturbos have the standard smoothcase transmission which is just as weak...just different ratios sometimes exist.
And the ratio changes are so small you'd never notice them back to back in terms of acceleration. Even the 4.30 rear isn't a really big change from the standard 4.10 in terms of acceleration.
Old 10-06-04, 01:17 PM
  #25  
Lives on the Forum

Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
The t2 trans weighs 10-15lb extra.


Quick Reply: NA and turbo II drivetrain differences: documentation and pictures



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.