My FC weighs 2420 pounds
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario, Canada
I don't know how it works on your car, but on mine they direct air to the rotor area. You may have the dust covers on, but they should still do something.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by 88IntegraLS
The logicon came out because I refuse to troubleshoot some electrical engineers modular circuits just go get my heater and fan to work. I am replacing it with three choke cables and a rheostat. They won't look ghetto; they all look the same: neat round black handles with a round black knurled **** for the heater speed. The cables do the heat / cold, def. / panel vents, and rec / fresh functions. I don't need labels on them to remember which one will do what, and the center console will be a lot simpler looking that way.
My stereo surround is pissing me off and it's going in the trash, too. I will build another surround like the kind that the Porsche 928 comes with. I'm thinking of replacing the top rectangular vents with two round ones further down the console, so I can mount a few gauges right at the top where I can see them easiest.
I do need to tie the front frame rails together to stiffen up the chassis, and will probably fab a metal or composite beam just for that purpose, but I have been accident free as a driver for the past 7 years and I don't intend to get in any accidents. I have avoided many accidents by dodging cars in the past; you just have to dodge an idiot sometimes to escape a crash.
The logicon came out because I refuse to troubleshoot some electrical engineers modular circuits just go get my heater and fan to work. I am replacing it with three choke cables and a rheostat. They won't look ghetto; they all look the same: neat round black handles with a round black knurled **** for the heater speed. The cables do the heat / cold, def. / panel vents, and rec / fresh functions. I don't need labels on them to remember which one will do what, and the center console will be a lot simpler looking that way.
My stereo surround is pissing me off and it's going in the trash, too. I will build another surround like the kind that the Porsche 928 comes with. I'm thinking of replacing the top rectangular vents with two round ones further down the console, so I can mount a few gauges right at the top where I can see them easiest.
I do need to tie the front frame rails together to stiffen up the chassis, and will probably fab a metal or composite beam just for that purpose, but I have been accident free as a driver for the past 7 years and I don't intend to get in any accidents. I have avoided many accidents by dodging cars in the past; you just have to dodge an idiot sometimes to escape a crash.
i would use the composite or wood, you want the rebar to take the impact and not transmit it like a metal one might do
mike
I wish I was driving!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by 88IntegraLS
I have been accident free as a driver for the past 7 years and I don't intend to get in any accidents. I have avoided many accidents by dodging cars in the past; you just have to dodge an idiot sometimes to escape a crash.
I have been accident free as a driver for the past 7 years and I don't intend to get in any accidents. I have avoided many accidents by dodging cars in the past; you just have to dodge an idiot sometimes to escape a crash.
On that same level of thought, have you also removed the seatbelts? No point if you don't intend on getting in a crash. What about insurance? Guess you have no need for that either.
You can never predict someone else's driving ability, and you are naive to think you are completely safe. Removing a structural member of the frame is stupid, and I really hope you never learn why.
I agree with scarthcart and the others... if there is one thing i Would put back in the car would have to be the font bumper...
To compensate I would simply buy aftermarket seats... or ditch the passenger one! cause that will save as much if not more weight!
To compensate I would simply buy aftermarket seats... or ditch the passenger one! cause that will save as much if not more weight!
I feel so encouraged by you people. What a happy place this is.
For example, Awhile ago when I did the 5-lug swap, I started a thread posting that GXL sway-bars are a few mm beefier, and all i got was people bitching at me that the correct term is ANTI-sway bar.
We live in such a constructive world.
I think that everybody likes to feel bigger by ridiculing... everybody has gotten it and has given it here! my post was more of a contructive critisism more than anything
!
!
im sorry the forum has gotten so bad about **** like this...3 years ago it wasnt ever like this and you could actually get smart, nice people to help you with things...now its just a handful of good people and a bunch of losers who spend hours at a time on the forum looking for someone to make fun of or embarass or whatever it is they do...but they usually fail at it. i88integ...i like your style, you are a true rotary enthusist...keep up the good work i like hearing about that awesome fc.
btw, those muffler heat shields that kinda surround the mufflers...i find no use for them...you might want to concider removing them if you havent already..i did with no adverse affects in the past 2~3 years and im hard on my car. dont remeber how much they weight...but its something
btw, those muffler heat shields that kinda surround the mufflers...i find no use for them...you might want to concider removing them if you havent already..i did with no adverse affects in the past 2~3 years and im hard on my car. dont remeber how much they weight...but its something
Originally posted by ForsakenRX7
Less weight is the equivalent to adding horsepower. Why? Simple. You are changing the power the weight ratio to your favor. It doesnt take a genious to figure out that a 3000 pound car with the same horsepower as a 2600 pound car will lose.
Less weight is the equivalent to adding horsepower. Why? Simple. You are changing the power the weight ratio to your favor. It doesnt take a genious to figure out that a 3000 pound car with the same horsepower as a 2600 pound car will lose.
Originally posted by scathcart
I don't think anyone intends on getting into a accident. If they did, it would not be "accidental".
On that same level of thought, have you also removed the seatbelts? No point if you don't intend on getting in a crash. What about insurance? Guess you have no need for that either.
You can never predict someone else's driving ability, and you are naive to think you are completely safe. Removing a structural member of the frame is stupid, and I really hope you never learn why.
I don't think anyone intends on getting into a accident. If they did, it would not be "accidental".
On that same level of thought, have you also removed the seatbelts? No point if you don't intend on getting in a crash. What about insurance? Guess you have no need for that either.
You can never predict someone else's driving ability, and you are naive to think you are completely safe. Removing a structural member of the frame is stupid, and I really hope you never learn why.
Originally posted by BDoty311
You go out of your weigh to post useful and creditable information, and all you get is people rudiculing you.
You go out of your weigh to post useful and creditable information, and all you get is people rudiculing you.
Why has everyone gone so damn soft?
That sure is light. That is FB weights I suppose
Huh, so how does it handle with no rear sway bar?
When you say dash support you do not mean that round support tube that runs back there do you?
James

Huh, so how does it handle with no rear sway bar?
When you say dash support you do not mean that round support tube that runs back there do you?
James
Let me express my sincere thanks to those of you who do not like my taste in suspension set-up and have expressed your thoughts. I was not aware that the rear anti-sway bar's absence could induce understeer, which the stock rear-steer would compensate for, at or above ~.5g lateral acceleration. Furthermore, I did not know that trail braking can compensate for mild understeer, nor could the absence of an LSD or rear wheel bias, however slight it may be.
So, if you don't mind me asking, why did my thread title "my FC weighs 2420 pounds" get your attention and "inventory of weight reduction" did not? I posted that exact list of removed items a few days ago in another thread, but you Turbo II drivers only contributed to this thread? Why is that? Is there some kind of motivation for replying to a thread with a weight listed, rather than a thread that outlines how to achieve that weight? Enlighten me. I'm kind of in need of advice you know. I mean, I didn't even know what a rear anti-sway bar did until you guys pointed out that it was bad to remove it.
So, if you don't mind me asking, why did my thread title "my FC weighs 2420 pounds" get your attention and "inventory of weight reduction" did not? I posted that exact list of removed items a few days ago in another thread, but you Turbo II drivers only contributed to this thread? Why is that? Is there some kind of motivation for replying to a thread with a weight listed, rather than a thread that outlines how to achieve that weight? Enlighten me. I'm kind of in need of advice you know. I mean, I didn't even know what a rear anti-sway bar did until you guys pointed out that it was bad to remove it.
Lots of haters here eh?
Jeff, you also might consider reinstalling the dash frame. That bar actually contributes to the chassis stiffness. Otherwise it is cool to know what it takes to get a 2400lb FC.
Jeff, you also might consider reinstalling the dash frame. That bar actually contributes to the chassis stiffness. Otherwise it is cool to know what it takes to get a 2400lb FC.
Originally posted by Dan H
I would love to drive a 2400lbs FC at an Auto-X.
I would love to drive a 2400lbs FC at an Auto-X.
More items on the list:
Aluminum flywheel (27-12lbs): 15
Header (mani/precats - header) 5
Aluminum spare (swap) 10
The car understeers too much so the rear bar is going back in when I put in the toe eliminators. The bar is lighter than I thought, however. On second inspection, I estimate 3 pounds with all hardware. I'm also going to build a crash brace / frame rail link out of fiberglass in the near future, which should be about 10 pounds. Hopefully it will end up right at 2400 in race trim and slightly more with spare, jack, tools, and oil.
Originally posted by rotary>piston
Seems you lost ... .... over the course of a year.
Seems you lost ... .... over the course of a year.
Last edited by Center of The Universe; Oct 20, 2003 at 11:36 PM.
Originally posted by 88IntegraLS
The car understeers too much
The car understeers too much
Congrats on the light car.
damn the rear of your car weights more than the front, must make for good launches, my 88 TII weights 2515 and the front weights slightly more than the rear, my launches are very tricky
I dunno, I've just got a lot of respect for people who put as much work into a car as 88 has. Anyone here who has kept up with him and his build process has seen a lot of work go into that car. I too dont recommend removing the REAR sway bar. I hate understeer. Oversteer? I can deal with that.
Anyhow, good job 88. Your one of the useful posters on this forum.
Anyhow, good job 88. Your one of the useful posters on this forum.
Thanks. Once I get some experience with this thing on a course, maybe I can contribute to Race Car Tech a little more. The crowd there is very different. 
This thing is so cool. I had a looong day today with a mid term exam, project presentation, and a bunch of other uncool stuff to deal with. When I finally got to leave campus at 7:00 tonight, I fired up the FC and ripped home, and I'm wearing a smile now! The car is not like it used to be . . having been lightened and ported. I love it and am looking forward to getting my RB header on it.
Okay, enough of that gushing from me . . But a built FC is one decent machine to have for fun drives and lightening your mood after a hard day.

This thing is so cool. I had a looong day today with a mid term exam, project presentation, and a bunch of other uncool stuff to deal with. When I finally got to leave campus at 7:00 tonight, I fired up the FC and ripped home, and I'm wearing a smile now! The car is not like it used to be . . having been lightened and ported. I love it and am looking forward to getting my RB header on it.
Okay, enough of that gushing from me . . But a built FC is one decent machine to have for fun drives and lightening your mood after a hard day.
i have seen a 1700lb fc with engine+tranny+fuel cell and full cage
i though it weighted 1900lbs but its lighter, it should be a bit heavier after the driveshaft and rear diff gets put back in. (not really 100% sure if they are in or not, rear diff was getting welded the last I saw it)
this car does not have a rotary engine in it though
i though it weighted 1900lbs but its lighter, it should be a bit heavier after the driveshaft and rear diff gets put back in. (not really 100% sure if they are in or not, rear diff was getting welded the last I saw it)this car does not have a rotary engine in it though






