2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

And my engine project begins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #401  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
1st gens look nice with the right body kit. many people comment on how Kevin's looks when they are in my shop.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #402  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Alright ya party crasher, no more livin the glory days. Die thread!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006 | 01:13 PM
  #403  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by Karack
1st gens look nice with the right body kit. many people comment on how Kevin's looks when they are in my shop.
Who is Kevin and who has pics?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 09:08 PM
  #404  
mycarisolderthanme's Avatar
Back.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
But this I've learned so much from this thread! It hurts to see it end like this.. so dDub, did you get rid of the motor you were building or do you think you could use that when you find your 1st gen?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 09:13 PM
  #405  
ddub's Avatar
Thread Starter
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
I have a different plan for an engine when I get my 1st gen. I want something simpler, more streetable, not as.... loud.

Long story short, I'll be using an s5 TII block with s5 NA rotors, a streetport porting style for NA (meaning designed for no forced induction), s5 TII LIM with FD UIM and TB, standalone (probably microtech), and so on.

So no I wont be using that same engine.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #406  
mycarisolderthanme's Avatar
Back.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Interesting.. so what makes you think all these forced induction manifolds will work better than the ones designed for naturally aspirated applications? I'm sure you've done your research, I'd just like to see it!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 09:53 PM
  #407  
ddub's Avatar
Thread Starter
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
For one, I will be using a 4 port block... Not very easy or good to use a 6port n/a manifold on a 4port turbo block.

Second, from flowtesting I've seen they appear to flow much better. Less bends, larger runners, etc.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #408  
mycarisolderthanme's Avatar
Back.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Didn't even think about the intake port issue. And, if for some reason it doesn't work out NA, you'll be in great position to slap a turbo on the side of it. =)

And about your decision to use microtech, what turned you away from megasquirt? I'm trying to map out my modification plans on my upcoming TII and MSnS works very well into my budget. But if all your trial and error didn't pay off for you, then I doubt it would for me. After your experience with the system, what are your thoughts on it?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 10:05 PM
  #409  
ddub's Avatar
Thread Starter
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
No slapping a turbo on would be a bad idea. Like I said, the port design I will be using is meant for NON-TURBO, it is not a turbo style port. While it will work with turbo, it will not work as efficiently as it should. Besides, I don't want turbo, I prefer staying n/a.

Honestly, just the ease of it. The MS I had to build a harness for and fuses and all sorts of crap. Took quite a long time and was very annoying since I hate soldering. A microtech will come with a harness, much quicker and easier in my opinion. The MS is great, cheap, and easy to use, but I'm going to go with simplicity overall next time.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 10:22 PM
  #410  
mycarisolderthanme's Avatar
Back.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Thanks for the insight on the EMS issue.. I hate soldering as well and I'm not sure that I'd have the patience for the thing. Not to mention I don't know a thing about tuning and would probably blow at least one motor learning how. I'll probably just run a piggy-back for a few years until I lock down a nice job and can afford the 1k+ EMS.

I'm looking forward to seeing your NA dialed in with a nice standalone, should be interesting!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ciclovnz
Build Threads
18
Nov 26, 2015 04:35 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.