2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

MR-2 Hatch Conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:17 PM
  #1  
sliding_fox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NC
MR-2 Hatch Conversion

I've seen several FD3S, and one FC with a MR2 style piece to replace the hatch, does anyone know where to get this part? or will I just have to custom fab. it?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:19 PM
  #2  
zbrown's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 644
Likes: 1
From: scranton nd
interested too
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #3  
breckboarder55's Avatar
big port + big turbo=
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: 10 mins from Texas World Speedway
this thread is pointless with out picks... in other words what in the hell are you talking about?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:26 PM
  #4  
speed_monkey's Avatar
affen
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Did a quick search and came up with this

http://www.wisesports.co.jp/




Last edited by speed_monkey; Apr 20, 2006 at 07:29 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:42 PM
  #5  
DerangedHermit's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 5
From: Knoxville, TN 37916
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:44 PM
  #6  
speed_monkey's Avatar
affen
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
^^pretty much, and talk about blind spots! haha
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:49 PM
  #7  
fcdrifter13's Avatar
Play Well
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
From: We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?
Looks wierd kinda like a delsol, and I would probably throw it over a hill if it was mine, but then again its your car.

And wouldnt it wiegh alot.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:13 PM
  #8  
speed_monkey's Avatar
affen
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Its fiberglass so not really, but I still think its fugly.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #9  
SuperRotorMan's Avatar
Keep Your Stinky Pistons
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, Canada
where would u get ur hands on a hatch like that?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:28 PM
  #10  
Carzy Driver's Avatar
Law Breaker
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 0
From: S.F. Bay Area, California 510
that's ulgy!
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #11  
NeilTII's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: in my car
I don't know...Glass is pretty heavy so that hatch could weigh the same or even less than the stock. But......I would take the weight over Honda/Toyota look alike any day. Just my 7 cents
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #12  
bl0d's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: SE Missouri
Why would somebody ever want to put something like that on their MR2? The MKII's look pretty damn good stock, and you would look like a Transformer doing that to an MKI like mine.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #13  
fcdrifter13's Avatar
Play Well
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
From: We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?
I think the truck thing they have been doing to S13 might look alright.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 10:52 PM
  #14  
sliding_fox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NC
a trunk RX-7 FC would look good, but more difficult to do. my guess is you would need Vert. components to do that
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 11:33 PM
  #15  
raptor22's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, Socal
Not only is that conversion completely fugly, its aerodynamics are terrible.

A car's exit shape is actually more important than its entry shape. And the exit shape of most cars is far too vertical to mantain any kind of attatched flow. The RX-7 is an exception, and while it could use some work to get optimum performance, it is much better than most cars available.

A notchback design like that would create a rather sizeable are of low pressure covering almost the entire rear end of the car; causing a signifigant increase in drag. A frunk design would be less aerodynamic than stock, but far better than the notchback. The final result of any of these mods would be decreased high speed performance and increased fuel costs.

Why would you pay money for the priveledge of ruining your car's aerodynamics?

--Alex

Last edited by raptor22; Apr 21, 2006 at 11:36 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 11:39 PM
  #16  
raptor22's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, Socal
Oh, and BTW, that notchback mod would also pretty much eliminate any benefit from a spoiler as well, unless you mounted the spoiler at a rather unreasonable height.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
izzolaw
1st Gen General Discussion
2
Sep 27, 2015 08:33 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.