2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

More powerful fuel pump = more gas consumption?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #1  
InMyWhiteTII's Avatar
Thread Starter
We are the D
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
More powerful fuel pump = more gas consumption?

I heard someone on the board say that with a Walbro 255 pump you'll burn more gas than you would with the stock pump? How is this possible? The FPR should send all unused fuel back to the tank, right?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 10:37 AM
  #2  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
If you don't modifiy the fuel signal (with SAFC, etc.) then I think you migh use a little more gas (or a lot, I'm not an expert on this.) With a fuel computer you should be able to tune the fuel back to normal levels pretty easy I would think.
A better pump increases the fuel pressure which would push out more fuel in the time the injector is open because its not calibrated for it.

Last edited by Sideways7; Mar 26, 2006 at 10:39 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 10:46 AM
  #3  
InMyWhiteTII's Avatar
Thread Starter
We are the D
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
That makes sense...is the FPR vacuum operated or electronic? And also what is a rising rate FPR?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 10:47 AM
  #4  
SpAm@FC's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 734
Likes: 1
From: Austria
vac operated
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #5  
darksider's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: OH
sorry didnt want to start another thread. would i benefit (save more gave OR have more reliablity upgrading theses parts for my stock n/a s5 fc?

s5 tubo 2 or FD

fuel pump
fuel pressure
fuel regulator
injectors (most likely two more 550cc from another na for the smaller stock ones.)

its should be better then stock fuel system but im not looking for performance, just better gas and reliability. should i just stay na for this? thanks
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 11:23 AM
  #6  
sar's Avatar
sar
Doin a rebuild.
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Roswell (atl ) Georgia
The NA doesnt need more fuel, it needs less fuel. The stock computer currently runs very rich and as you will see with the S-AFC threads people can often lean out their NAs 20% cruise and 10% on hard acceleration.

For you to upgrade to these parts would be a waste of time/money/gas. You will have no reliability increase as detonation in an NA situation is much less detrimental and much less likely than in a forced induction situation. The reason why in a turbo this upgrade is helpful is when users substantially increase the boost they're running and therefore need more fuel.
Originally Posted by darksider
sorry didnt want to start another thread. would i benefit (save more gave OR have more reliablity upgrading theses parts for my stock n/a s5 fc?

s5 tubo 2 or FD

fuel pump
fuel pressure
fuel regulator
injectors (most likely two more 550cc from another na for the smaller stock ones.)

its should be better then stock fuel system but im not looking for performance, just better gas and reliability. should i just stay na for this? thanks
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #7  
Pinfield357's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh Pa
Originally Posted by InMyWhiteTII
That makes sense...is the FPR vacuum operated or electronic? And also what is a rising rate FPR?

The OEM regulater is vac opperated.

A rising rate FPR rases the fuel pressure in relation to boost that it sees via the vac nipple on it. typically is 1 to 1 like an Aeromotive FPR but some are adjustable for more fuel pressure per PSI like 3 to 1
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #8  
darksider's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: OH
so for better gas and reliability go for a super afc? I or II or VTEC? whats the best afc that best fits what i want to do? thanks
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
Rotospectre
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Mar 28, 2018 03:33 PM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM
LunchboxSA22
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
37
Oct 26, 2015 10:53 AM
82streetracer
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Aug 23, 2015 09:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.