mircotech for N/A
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
It's interesting how this is worded.
Is that gain really from the lack of AFM, or from the properly tuned standalone, or both? 
Is that gain really from the lack of AFM, or from the properly tuned standalone, or both? 
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Honestly, for 99% of people, the AFM is a nonissue. I personally know of someone with a 13B-RE in a 1st gen, running the TII injection system (complete with AFM). 60-1 compressor on TO4E hot side. That car was a rocket...easily close to 400HP.
400hp you say?
<--- Microtech LT-8 | Stock-port |
We managed 173 RWHP on a slightly lean dyno run.
With a somewhat "safer" run we settled on 167 to the rear tires.
Moral - Yes Microtech ECU is very much so worth the $$$ if you are looking to gain signifigant power from your N/A engine.
We managed 173 RWHP on a slightly lean dyno run.
With a somewhat "safer" run we settled on 167 to the rear tires.
Moral - Yes Microtech ECU is very much so worth the $$$ if you are looking to gain signifigant power from your N/A engine.
thank you very much guys, ive made my call and standalone it is. i specifically asked for microtech coz thats the only standalone we have a tuner here for, 1 of only 2 in canada (ForceFed Performance). the owner, Marko, actually achieved the title of fastest streetdriven import in the vancouver area. 560 some odd whp and a 10.73 qtr. mile. i believe that speaks volumes of what his microtech can do.
even tho ive heard that the other brands (haltech, power pc, wolf 3d...etc) have more capabilities, as one person here said: "a very well tuned microtech will out-perform a less-tuned haltech any day."
even tho ive heard that the other brands (haltech, power pc, wolf 3d...etc) have more capabilities, as one person here said: "a very well tuned microtech will out-perform a less-tuned haltech any day."
Can someone with a microtech on their N/A please post their settings (load/idle maps and the like) in this, https://www.rx7club.com/microtech-111/tii-stock-base-maps-343297/ thread.
that'd be great, thanks.
that'd be great, thanks.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by silverrotor
Hmm, thats odd, I know that same person.
400hp you say? 
400hp you say? 
I don't run an LT8, I'm running a Digi 2 pro.
Same **** really, fuel and ignition just slightly worse resolution than the newer models, same options and other functions.. (although i'm only using it for fuel right at the moment..)
Reason I'm running it is because it was free.
other mods, not a whole lot, largish streetport, 2.5in exhaust (straight pipe, no mufflers) still using the stock manifold.
still debating wether or not I want to turbo it.
Or keep this engine n/a and build a better engine.
Grr i dunno... decissions decissions..
Same **** really, fuel and ignition just slightly worse resolution than the newer models, same options and other functions.. (although i'm only using it for fuel right at the moment..)
Reason I'm running it is because it was free.
other mods, not a whole lot, largish streetport, 2.5in exhaust (straight pipe, no mufflers) still using the stock manifold.

still debating wether or not I want to turbo it.
Or keep this engine n/a and build a better engine.
Grr i dunno... decissions decissions..
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
With that turbo and the RE, it must be. Though the engine is no longer in the car...What he's doing now is just crazy. 


Anyway, a follow up Is In order.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM







