2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Microtech install on N/A (Completed)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 07:35 PM
  #1  
Relisys190's Avatar
Thread Starter
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
Microtech install on N/A (Completed)

Yup,

Well, after two long weeks the system is finally in. I am currently running an LT-8 system on a base map. While the car was under construction i also managed to get S5 lower, middle and Upper intake manifold setup. Portmatched and polished all the manifolds, installed 550cc secondary's , completed the TB mod, removed the 5th & 6th sleeves, die-grinded the rear iron to make room for the S5 intake setup, And wired open the VDI.

Impressions: Definatly a power increase. Idle is rock solid even though all emissions/smooth idle equipment have been removed. Throttle response is now instant! I still have to play around with my intake (filter) setup. It's temporarily bolted directly to my TB elbow , becuase it all we could think of at the time and we had been working for 8 strait hours building the manifolds, porting, completing a wire harness ect..ect..

The Microtech is a dream come true. mostly plug and play, I had to splice a few plugs from my old harness. Once the system was bolted in and everything checked out ok, we turned the ignition and BOOM! cranked and ran very smooth on a base map. Becuase i'm running 550cc's up top i had Scott pull a little fuel out, but she's still alittle rich in the upper Rpms. Next week will be the dyno/tuning day to see if we can pull another 10-12 HP from a good "tune"

The new (er) intake manifolds are also nice, i can feel the car pull much harder from around 4000 rpm all the way up to my LT-8 set redline (8250 rpm)

Overall : Removing the restrictive AFM is one of the best ways to gain HP on an N/A motor. You've got all this air trying to rush into a little box with a flapper door, sure it works great at "factory" CFM levels but cannot adequatly keep up once power starts to increase. Mind you i still have a completly stock motor, 86' N/A no port work with about 65K on the clock. My goal originally was to get 200 Flywheel horsepower out of this motor, and i think i'm pretty damn close. Everything BUT the internals of the engine have been modified.

Later,

-Markus Reschny
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
wow--sounds great!!

Any figures on a $$ spent to date to do this? We N/A guys need thise kind of answers!
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 08:19 PM
  #3  
Relisys190's Avatar
Thread Starter
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
The Microtech obviously being the most expensive was $700 Only because i am affiliated with a shop that sell's, installs and tunes Microtech systems.

The entire manifold set-up, and porting was $120
550cc x 2 injectors $50
Misc shop supplies, injector seals/grommets fuel line, new intake gaskets, vaccum caps, custom block off plates ect..ect.. $45
Paying Bart to install the system on a saturday..$100

I still have another $50-$75 of tuning on the dyno before this is all finished. But like i said, 200 Flywheel Hp is very respectable.

-Markus Reschny
www.mazsport.net
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 08:26 PM
  #4  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
How does not having an AFM work? I thought you had to have one?

Also, what kind of power gain difference would there be between a piggyback fuel computer and a full standalone EMS?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #5  
Relisys190's Avatar
Thread Starter
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
A piggyback system retains the factory flapper door system. These types of system while being much less expensive than a complete EMS system are limited to what a Haltech or Microtech or Wolf system can do.. With a full standalone system it allows you to ditch the AFM completely.

Also the difference between power gains from piggyback / EMS would prolly be somewhere in the area of 12-20 HP difference when both system are properly tuned.


-Markus Reschny
www.mazsport.net

Last edited by Relisys190; Mar 14, 2004 at 08:40 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 08:44 PM
  #6  
silverrotor's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
I was going to to this awhile running my NA setup. Instead, I did a TII conversion and I did It with the LT-8 aswell. I like the system.

Did you get the BAC Valve option setup? You do know you have to request this, rather than assume that the BAC Valve will be operational with the LT-8?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 08:58 PM
  #7  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
Could similar results be obtained with an AEM or HKS standalone EMS?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 09:01 PM
  #8  
wrxfan's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: so cal
nice..sounds like a good setup
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #9  
Relisys190's Avatar
Thread Starter
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
Silverrotor, i currently do not run with a Bypass air control valve. I guess it helps with you have a working A/C and P/S but i have neither so i got lucky, lol.

Snub Dis... Yes, similar results can be obtained, but it's all a matter of "which offers the easiest tuning"

-Markus Reschny
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #10  
Relisys190's Avatar
Thread Starter
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
One of the main reasons i installed a full blown stand alone system like this:

It gives me the option to upgrade as big and as bad as a want. I am still undecided if i am going to stay N/A or not. Something in me wants to run a Brap-Brap N/A, plain and simple. Than again something in me wants to run a Brap-Brap / T66 , and the Microtech will be there, waiting quietly ready to do it's job. N/A, Turbo, NOS, it's all endless with a Standalone.

-Markus Reschny
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 09:13 PM
  #11  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
Well then. After seeing your astronomical HP numbers, I think that I'll ditch any ideas of forced induction (too much money at any given time). I guess I'll wait for my motor to start giving out, then have it rebuilt. And while it's being rebuilt, put in new 5th and 6th port sleeves, put on a nicely ported/extrude honed upper/lower intake manifold from an S5 with the VDI wired open, and also have a somewhat mild streetport performed. Sounds good to me, but does anyone know what kind of RWHP that would put out?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 09:38 PM
  #12  
Relisys190's Avatar
Thread Starter
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
I am hoping for * as seen in my sig * slightly over 200whp with a new bridgeport motor currently in the works.

Your talking MILD street port? With all this and some sort of Aftermarket standalone ECU system you should see right around 190rwhp, maybe alittle more.

BridgePort with a properly tuned system would get you to just under what the N/A transmission can handle, 215-220whp

And don't even bring up PP :-)

-Markus Reschny
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 10:24 PM
  #13  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
That's an awesome amount of power, and coupled with the response available with N/A cars, I could do quite well in my class for SCCA Solo II.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 10:42 PM
  #14  
Bio-Weapon's Avatar
Wha?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Niagara Falls, Canada
Just curious as to why you removed the aux port sleeves, and wired the VDI open?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 10:45 PM
  #15  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
I would love to do this mod along with a custom intake manifold.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 01:07 AM
  #16  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by Relisys190
Definatly a power increase. Idle is rock solid even though all emissions/smooth idle equipment have been removed. Throttle response is now instant!
The "other" Scott in St. Pete has been running Wolf EMS's on NA's for a couple of years now with the same results. It's nice to see that other people are trying it out now, because nobody ever believes the results until they try it themselves, lol. Now you know why I keep saying that an EMS should be one of the first mods if you are serious about your engine.

Originally posted by Relisys190
Removing the restrictive AFM is one of the best ways to gain HP on an N/A motor. You've got all this air trying to rush into a little box with a flapper door, sure it works great at "factory" CFM levels but cannot adequatly keep up once power starts to increase.
Most of your gains are from getting rid of that nasty stock computer. The AFM isn't as much of a restriction as you may think. Once you get the engine tuned, try putting the AFM back in place (with the air filter you are using now) and see what you get on the dyno. At the 200hp level, I don't think it's going to show much difference on the dyno.

Originally posted by Relisys190
Next week will be the dyno/tuning day to see if we can pull another 10-12 HP from a good "tune"
That's entirely possible.

Originally posted by Relisys190
Your talking MILD street port? With all this and some sort of Aftermarket standalone ECU system you should see right around 190rwhp, maybe alittle more.

BridgePort with a properly tuned system would get you to just under what the N/A transmission can handle, 215-220whp

And don't even bring up PP :-)
I would like to see what happens when you port the engine. IMO the LT8 is going to have a more difficult time as the porting increases because the vacuum is going to become less and less, and the LT8 currently has a fixed load band allocation which means less available load bands. However, sometimes theory doesn't always work out with reality, especially if you install a full-range TPS and the MT can make up for the load deficiency with accurate Alpha-N input for acceleration enrichment. Please keep us posted.

Originally posted by snub disphenoid
How does not having an AFM work? I thought you had to have one?

Also, what kind of power gain difference would there be between a piggyback fuel computer and a full standalone EMS?
A standalone EMS uses its own sensors, so the AFM is not needed.

The peak horsepower difference of a standalone EMS vs. a fully-programmable piggyback fuel computer plus ignition computer is going to be marginal. The main advantage of the EMS is that it gets rid of the slow 80's technology stock ECU, and throttle response is greatly improved. Also, getting rid of the AFM does help free up some of the intake restriction, but more so at higher horsepower levels.

Last edited by Evil Aviator; Mar 15, 2004 at 01:09 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 05:23 AM
  #17  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
I'd like to hear if it's still running in 6 months...in a year...?


-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 07:53 AM
  #18  
wozzoom's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 903
Likes: 1
From: Conyngham, PA
I'd like to know if you can pass an emissions test with a Microtech?

Can you still get the ACV to function properly?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 09:22 AM
  #19  
jon88se's Avatar
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Ted,

why would the motor not last? in theory, he should be able to get the car running more efficiently with the microtech (depending on how well he can tune).
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 11:56 AM
  #20  
SDrotary-FC's Avatar
@ pipnorcali
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 1
From: Grass valley, ca
nice good work i am doing a simular project with my 86 n/a, keep us posted when you get some dyno #'s
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 06:25 PM
  #21  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally posted by jon88se
Ted,

why would the motor not last? in theory, he should be able to get the car running more efficiently with the microtech (depending on how well he can tune).
I question if this was an embellishment or an exageration[sp?] of the install and initial tune.

This is the easiest story I have heard of installing and tuning any EMS.  I have not heard of another write-up that made it sound this easy.

I am not questioning the quality of the motor; I'm questioning how well the engine can be tuned.  If you think you cannot damage an NA engine with an EMS...oh boy.


-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #22  
SDrotary-FC's Avatar
@ pipnorcali
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 1
From: Grass valley, ca
Originally posted by RETed
I question if this was an embellishment or an exageration[sp?] of the install and initial tune.

This is the easiest story I have heard of installing and tuning any EMS.  I have not heard of another write-up that made it sound this easy.

I am not questioning the quality of the motor; I'm questioning how well the engine can be tuned.  If you think you cannot damage an NA engine with an EMS...oh boy.


-Ted
instal on a microtech is easier because you use your stock sensors and i comes with a base map already
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 06:54 PM
  #23  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
If it were all this easy, then why haven't more people done it?


-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 07:55 PM
  #24  
SwooshMan's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
I wired mine in about 3 hours, alone. It started right up and i've never installed a stand alone ems. Its very easy. A little wiring knowledge and common sense and it becomes a walk in the park. The reason more people havent done it is $$$.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 08:04 PM
  #25  
jon88se's Avatar
Eat, sleep, work, mod.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
i don't think he's talking about the install itself, but rather the installation and tuning. poor tuning is likely the #1 engine killer here as the 13B is pretty stout, again, tuned correctly. too much boost from creeping and not enough fuel or improper break in prematurely kills rotaries quickly from what I can tell on the forums. combine this with the fact that a rotary can only take a couple of good pings before it's toast.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.