Microtech install on N/A (Completed)
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
Microtech install on N/A (Completed)
Yup,
Well, after two long weeks the system is finally in. I am currently running an LT-8 system on a base map. While the car was under construction i also managed to get S5 lower, middle and Upper intake manifold setup. Portmatched and polished all the manifolds, installed 550cc secondary's , completed the TB mod, removed the 5th & 6th sleeves, die-grinded the rear iron to make room for the S5 intake setup, And wired open the VDI.
Impressions: Definatly a power increase. Idle is rock solid even though all emissions/smooth idle equipment have been removed. Throttle response is now instant! I still have to play around with my intake (filter) setup. It's temporarily bolted directly to my TB elbow , becuase it all we could think of at the time and we had been working for 8 strait hours building the manifolds, porting, completing a wire harness ect..ect..
The Microtech is a dream come true. mostly plug and play, I had to splice a few plugs from my old harness. Once the system was bolted in and everything checked out ok, we turned the ignition and BOOM! cranked and ran very smooth on a base map. Becuase i'm running 550cc's up top i had Scott pull a little fuel out, but she's still alittle rich in the upper Rpms. Next week will be the dyno/tuning day to see if we can pull another 10-12 HP from a good "tune"
The new (er) intake manifolds are also nice, i can feel the car pull much harder from around 4000 rpm all the way up to my LT-8 set redline (8250 rpm)
Overall : Removing the restrictive AFM is one of the best ways to gain HP on an N/A motor. You've got all this air trying to rush into a little box with a flapper door, sure it works great at "factory" CFM levels but cannot adequatly keep up once power starts to increase. Mind you i still have a completly stock motor, 86' N/A no port work with about 65K on the clock. My goal originally was to get 200 Flywheel horsepower out of this motor, and i think i'm pretty damn close. Everything BUT the internals of the engine have been modified.
Later,
-Markus Reschny
Well, after two long weeks the system is finally in. I am currently running an LT-8 system on a base map. While the car was under construction i also managed to get S5 lower, middle and Upper intake manifold setup. Portmatched and polished all the manifolds, installed 550cc secondary's , completed the TB mod, removed the 5th & 6th sleeves, die-grinded the rear iron to make room for the S5 intake setup, And wired open the VDI.
Impressions: Definatly a power increase. Idle is rock solid even though all emissions/smooth idle equipment have been removed. Throttle response is now instant! I still have to play around with my intake (filter) setup. It's temporarily bolted directly to my TB elbow , becuase it all we could think of at the time and we had been working for 8 strait hours building the manifolds, porting, completing a wire harness ect..ect..
The Microtech is a dream come true. mostly plug and play, I had to splice a few plugs from my old harness. Once the system was bolted in and everything checked out ok, we turned the ignition and BOOM! cranked and ran very smooth on a base map. Becuase i'm running 550cc's up top i had Scott pull a little fuel out, but she's still alittle rich in the upper Rpms. Next week will be the dyno/tuning day to see if we can pull another 10-12 HP from a good "tune"
The new (er) intake manifolds are also nice, i can feel the car pull much harder from around 4000 rpm all the way up to my LT-8 set redline (8250 rpm)
Overall : Removing the restrictive AFM is one of the best ways to gain HP on an N/A motor. You've got all this air trying to rush into a little box with a flapper door, sure it works great at "factory" CFM levels but cannot adequatly keep up once power starts to increase. Mind you i still have a completly stock motor, 86' N/A no port work with about 65K on the clock. My goal originally was to get 200 Flywheel horsepower out of this motor, and i think i'm pretty damn close. Everything BUT the internals of the engine have been modified.
Later,
-Markus Reschny
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
The Microtech obviously being the most expensive was $700 Only because i am affiliated with a shop that sell's, installs and tunes Microtech systems.
The entire manifold set-up, and porting was $120
550cc x 2 injectors $50
Misc shop supplies, injector seals/grommets fuel line, new intake gaskets, vaccum caps, custom block off plates ect..ect.. $45
Paying Bart to install the system on a saturday..$100
I still have another $50-$75 of tuning on the dyno before this is all finished. But like i said, 200 Flywheel Hp is very respectable.
-Markus Reschny
www.mazsport.net
The entire manifold set-up, and porting was $120
550cc x 2 injectors $50
Misc shop supplies, injector seals/grommets fuel line, new intake gaskets, vaccum caps, custom block off plates ect..ect.. $45
Paying Bart to install the system on a saturday..$100
I still have another $50-$75 of tuning on the dyno before this is all finished. But like i said, 200 Flywheel Hp is very respectable.
-Markus Reschny
www.mazsport.net
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
A piggyback system retains the factory flapper door system. These types of system while being much less expensive than a complete EMS system are limited to what a Haltech or Microtech or Wolf system can do.. With a full standalone system it allows you to ditch the AFM completely.
Also the difference between power gains from piggyback / EMS would prolly be somewhere in the area of 12-20 HP difference when both system are properly tuned.
-Markus Reschny
www.mazsport.net
Also the difference between power gains from piggyback / EMS would prolly be somewhere in the area of 12-20 HP difference when both system are properly tuned.
-Markus Reschny
www.mazsport.net
Last edited by Relisys190; Mar 14, 2004 at 08:40 PM.
I was going to to this awhile running my NA setup. Instead, I did a TII conversion and I did It with the LT-8 aswell.
I like the system.
Did you get the BAC Valve option setup? You do know you have to request this, rather than assume that the BAC Valve will be operational with the LT-8?
I like the system.Did you get the BAC Valve option setup? You do know you have to request this, rather than assume that the BAC Valve will be operational with the LT-8?
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
Silverrotor, i currently do not run with a Bypass air control valve. I guess it helps with you have a working A/C and P/S but i have neither so i got lucky, lol.
Snub Dis... Yes, similar results can be obtained, but it's all a matter of "which offers the easiest tuning"
-Markus Reschny
Snub Dis... Yes, similar results can be obtained, but it's all a matter of "which offers the easiest tuning"
-Markus Reschny
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
One of the main reasons i installed a full blown stand alone system like this:
It gives me the option to upgrade as big and as bad as a want. I am still undecided if i am going to stay N/A or not. Something in me wants to run a Brap-Brap N/A, plain and simple. Than again something in me wants to run a Brap-Brap / T66 , and the Microtech will be there, waiting quietly ready to do it's job. N/A, Turbo, NOS, it's all endless with a Standalone.
-Markus Reschny
It gives me the option to upgrade as big and as bad as a want. I am still undecided if i am going to stay N/A or not. Something in me wants to run a Brap-Brap N/A, plain and simple. Than again something in me wants to run a Brap-Brap / T66 , and the Microtech will be there, waiting quietly ready to do it's job. N/A, Turbo, NOS, it's all endless with a Standalone.
-Markus Reschny
Well then. After seeing your astronomical HP numbers, I think that I'll ditch any ideas of forced induction (too much money at any given time). I guess I'll wait for my motor to start giving out, then have it rebuilt. And while it's being rebuilt, put in new 5th and 6th port sleeves, put on a nicely ported/extrude honed upper/lower intake manifold from an S5 with the VDI wired open, and also have a somewhat mild streetport performed. Sounds good to me, but does anyone know what kind of RWHP that would put out?
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
I am hoping for * as seen in my sig * slightly over 200whp with a new bridgeport motor currently in the works.
Your talking MILD street port? With all this and some sort of Aftermarket standalone ECU system you should see right around 190rwhp, maybe alittle more.
BridgePort with a properly tuned system would get you to just under what the N/A transmission can handle, 215-220whp
And don't even bring up PP :-)
-Markus Reschny
Your talking MILD street port? With all this and some sort of Aftermarket standalone ECU system you should see right around 190rwhp, maybe alittle more.
BridgePort with a properly tuned system would get you to just under what the N/A transmission can handle, 215-220whp
And don't even bring up PP :-)
-Markus Reschny
Originally posted by Relisys190
Definatly a power increase. Idle is rock solid even though all emissions/smooth idle equipment have been removed. Throttle response is now instant!
Definatly a power increase. Idle is rock solid even though all emissions/smooth idle equipment have been removed. Throttle response is now instant!
Originally posted by Relisys190
Removing the restrictive AFM is one of the best ways to gain HP on an N/A motor. You've got all this air trying to rush into a little box with a flapper door, sure it works great at "factory" CFM levels but cannot adequatly keep up once power starts to increase.
Removing the restrictive AFM is one of the best ways to gain HP on an N/A motor. You've got all this air trying to rush into a little box with a flapper door, sure it works great at "factory" CFM levels but cannot adequatly keep up once power starts to increase.
Originally posted by Relisys190
Next week will be the dyno/tuning day to see if we can pull another 10-12 HP from a good "tune"
Next week will be the dyno/tuning day to see if we can pull another 10-12 HP from a good "tune"
Originally posted by Relisys190
Your talking MILD street port? With all this and some sort of Aftermarket standalone ECU system you should see right around 190rwhp, maybe alittle more.
BridgePort with a properly tuned system would get you to just under what the N/A transmission can handle, 215-220whp
And don't even bring up PP :-)
Your talking MILD street port? With all this and some sort of Aftermarket standalone ECU system you should see right around 190rwhp, maybe alittle more.
BridgePort with a properly tuned system would get you to just under what the N/A transmission can handle, 215-220whp
And don't even bring up PP :-)
Originally posted by snub disphenoid
How does not having an AFM work? I thought you had to have one?
Also, what kind of power gain difference would there be between a piggyback fuel computer and a full standalone EMS?
How does not having an AFM work? I thought you had to have one?
Also, what kind of power gain difference would there be between a piggyback fuel computer and a full standalone EMS?
The peak horsepower difference of a standalone EMS vs. a fully-programmable piggyback fuel computer plus ignition computer is going to be marginal. The main advantage of the EMS is that it gets rid of the slow 80's technology stock ECU, and throttle response is greatly improved. Also, getting rid of the AFM does help free up some of the intake restriction, but more so at higher horsepower levels.
Last edited by Evil Aviator; Mar 15, 2004 at 01:09 AM.
Originally posted by jon88se
Ted,
why would the motor not last? in theory, he should be able to get the car running more efficiently with the microtech (depending on how well he can tune).
Ted,
why would the motor not last? in theory, he should be able to get the car running more efficiently with the microtech (depending on how well he can tune).
This is the easiest story I have heard of installing and tuning any EMS. I have not heard of another write-up that made it sound this easy.
I am not questioning the quality of the motor; I'm questioning how well the engine can be tuned. If you think you cannot damage an NA engine with an EMS...oh boy.
-Ted
Originally posted by RETed
I question if this was an embellishment or an exageration[sp?] of the install and initial tune.
This is the easiest story I have heard of installing and tuning any EMS. I have not heard of another write-up that made it sound this easy.
I am not questioning the quality of the motor; I'm questioning how well the engine can be tuned. If you think you cannot damage an NA engine with an EMS...oh boy.
-Ted
I question if this was an embellishment or an exageration[sp?] of the install and initial tune.
This is the easiest story I have heard of installing and tuning any EMS. I have not heard of another write-up that made it sound this easy.
I am not questioning the quality of the motor; I'm questioning how well the engine can be tuned. If you think you cannot damage an NA engine with an EMS...oh boy.
-Ted
I wired mine in about 3 hours, alone. It started right up and i've never installed a stand alone ems. Its very easy. A little wiring knowledge and common sense and it becomes a walk in the park. The reason more people havent done it is $$$.
i don't think he's talking about the install itself, but rather the installation and tuning. poor tuning is likely the #1 engine killer here as the 13B is pretty stout, again, tuned correctly. too much boost from creeping and not enough fuel or improper break in prematurely kills rotaries quickly from what I can tell on the forums. combine this with the fact that a rotary can only take a couple of good pings before it's toast.





