making an FC behave like an FD
making an FC behave like an FD
The FD is considerably faster than the FC but somehow manages to maintain a similar fuel economy. My question is: are there certain modifications that can be done to an FC that would improve its performance to the point of being comparable to an FD while still keeping a reasonable fuel economy or does the FD engine just possess inherent improved technologies that cannot be easily replicated through modifications?
the fd weighs more my FC is 2650 and my FD is 2775
Trending Topics
They're most definitely not, having driven T2, s4 n/a, s5 n/a, and FD transmissions plenty. The FD has taller gears and higher top speed, not to mention a higher redline than the FC. The s4 T2 has the shortest gear ratios of series 4 - 6.
Short ratio ftw. Screw mileage.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 30
From: And the horse he rode in on...
The FC S5 has 200 Hp, the FD has 255 hp factory. The twin turbo setup was designed to spool at very low rpm with a small turbo, then just before the first turbo ran out of air, the second small turbo opens up. Boost pattern stock is something like 10 psi-((first turbo fully spooled)8 psi-(second turbo opening up) 10 psi( second turbo fully spooled). The control system was very complicated and became troublesome with age.
Closest you can get with a single turbo would be something ball bearing like the Garrett Disco potato GT2860R (GT28RS). This statement will start an argument.
The big turbo guys will say this turbo runs out of breath at higher rpms-they would be correct, especially compared to some of the T4 turbos in use in the rotary world. But the T4's that give the high Hp won't spool nearly as quick. Depends on what you want, response or max Hp.
But don't ask me...
Closest you can get with a single turbo would be something ball bearing like the Garrett Disco potato GT2860R (GT28RS). This statement will start an argument.
The big turbo guys will say this turbo runs out of breath at higher rpms-they would be correct, especially compared to some of the T4 turbos in use in the rotary world. But the T4's that give the high Hp won't spool nearly as quick. Depends on what you want, response or max Hp.
But don't ask me...
I was also under the impression that they were the same at least between the S5 Turbo and say, a '95 USDM
Sources:
Gear ratios
-----------
Manual Automatic
1st gear 3.483 3.027
2nd gear 2.015 1.619
3rd gear 1.391 1.000
4th gear 1.000 0.694
5th gear 0.719 ----
Rear end 4.100 3.909
I don't know how valid that 2nd source is, but if you can shed some more light as to what the ratios for the 3rd Gen are, that would be much appreciated.
Sources:
Originally Posted by From 2nd GEN FAQ

Originally Posted by http://www.k-rad.com/3genfaq
Gear ratios
-----------
Manual Automatic
1st gear 3.483 3.027
2nd gear 2.015 1.619
3rd gear 1.391 1.000
4th gear 1.000 0.694
5th gear 0.719 ----
Rear end 4.100 3.909
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ray green
1st Gen General Discussion
2
Sep 2, 2015 06:35 AM
rx8volks
Canadian Forum
0
Sep 1, 2015 11:02 PM
rx8volks
Canadian Forum
0
Sep 1, 2015 10:46 PM







