2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Make a Franken-engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 04:45 PM
  #1  
idsigloo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Displacement.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, Ky
Make a Franken-engine?

Ok, I'm rebuilding a s5 t2 engine. The rear housing is scarred all to hell so hurray. I'm going to get fd housings to replace both housings but I want to know if I should keep the same rotors (9.0:1) or throw in my set of s4 na rotors (9.5:1) in. I'll be streetporting this engine and I want to run about 10-12lbs of boost off the stock turbo and tmic. Does this sound good, or should I just stick with the s5 t2 rotors?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 05:05 PM
  #2  
Tournapart's Avatar
RIP Icemark
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 2
From: Mesa, AZ
uhhh, i thought the S5 rotors had higher compression, and the number diff was more like 8.5:1 for s4 and 9.4:1 on S5, atleast thats what ive read around here
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #3  
sar's Avatar
sar
Doin a rebuild.
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Roswell (atl ) Georgia
Na rotors will generate more power with less boost while turbo rotors will allow you to run more boost with less power/fuel.

The s5 nas do have 9.7:1 ratio while s4 nas are 9.4:1. Higher compression rotors should save you some off boost mileage too.

Do you have both sets of counterweights?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #4  
NOPR's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
if you never plan to run more than 10, i say go for it, but the stock turbo sucks so bad i think you'll get sick of it and want a bigger turbo and more boost eventually and if you want to run higher boost its a better idea to run 9:1 in the long run (this is EXTREMELY disputable). on the other hand, you can sell those 9:1 rotors for a lot more than the s4 n/a ones are worth....
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 06:24 PM
  #5  
idsigloo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Displacement.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, Ky
Ya, I have both sets of counterweights and both sets of rotors in good condition. I'm just looking for more power. What is keeping me from running the same amount of boost that I would on 9.0:1 rotors, on 9.5:1 rotors? Is it the octane of fuel or the housings just can't handle that much compression, the ratio and the boost together? If the problem is the fuel detonating early because of all the compression + boost, I have a haltech and can easily retard the timing.

I have s5 t2 rotors 9.0:1 and s4 na rotors 9.5:1
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 08:13 PM
  #6  
Driftlanta's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
I have friend running 9.4 84-85 se rotors in his T2 block. Its tuned on the conservative side for longevity. He also had his rotating assembly balanced with the heavier rotors. question being would you need to have everything rebalanced if you used the 9.7 s5 na rotors, being that they are same weight. or is every rotating assembly balanced separately from the factory .
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 08:24 PM
  #7  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
9.7 rotors are lighter than the 9.4 rotors

maybe you should consider water injection with this setup
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #8  
tinvestor's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: bartlett IL
+ 1 on the water injection. I want to try methanol then maybe nitromethane injection. Just not sure how many engines it will take to get it right if my math is off.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MazdaspeedR1
The Bad & Fugly Businesses
27
May 22, 2018 05:58 PM
jsesq
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
27
Sep 25, 2015 11:10 AM
ray green
1st Gen General Discussion
2
Sep 2, 2015 06:35 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 AM.