2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Lightweight Driveshaft/Flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #1  
millertime6009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Black Beast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
Lightweight Driveshaft/Flywheel

Current setup- 88 n/a with full RB exhaust and k&n intake.

The idea of being able to rev higher, accelerate faster, and be more durable while shedding pounds sounds very attractive to me. But is it worth the cash? I can get a carbon fiber driveshaft for $870 which weighs 10 lbs less than stock. Or an aluminum that weighs 5 less for $470. flywheels for around 400 weigh anywhere from 9-12 lbs. Unfortunatley this is the first manual car and rw car ive owned so i really dont know what kind of gains to expect or how it will effect drivability. For that kind of money i want to feel a noticeable increase in throttle response and acceleration(and a half second of my 1/4 time would be nice too). What should i do???
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 03:05 PM
  #2  
Gene's Avatar
10 lb. boost, 5lb. bag
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: New York, NY
Is the aluminum one that much less? I thought it was only like 2 lbs less. Unless this is a track car I don't know if it's worth the effort.

As for flywheels I have a very light one in my Turbo II, and it made a huge difference in revving and shifting, and a minor improvement in acceleration. It hurt ease of driving on the street considerably, but I run the car on the track a lot so overall I think it was worthwhile.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #3  
amhorach's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Do you do a lot of stop and go driving?

I suspect the bang for your buck would be greater if you spent your money in other areas. Spending $1300 on a 4.3 gear and an LSD would make your car accelerate a bit faster and wouldn't impact your driving if you do a lot of stop-go nearly as much as a lightweight flywheel.

If you do want to take the route you mentioned above, I'd advise making the change to your flywheel first. Keep your stock setup, drive it for a while and see how you like it. That way, if you don't like it, you can go back.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 04:33 PM
  #4  
millertime6009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Black Beast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
Yea i called the company to confirm it was 5 lbs less. I do use it for commuting, I would put in 4.3 gears but i dont want to hurt my mileage as it already isnt that great...
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #5  
misterstyx69's Avatar
Retired Moderator, RIP
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (142)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 136
From: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
Honestly the "bang for the Buck" factor for Lightening the Driveshaft Will not be Worth it.
I am Sure for 850 bucks you can get Some Nice coilovers and it will be an Investment that will be well worth it.
Mileage Sucks on a Rotary anyways.I hate to say it,But anything over 30 MPG is not going to Have Triangles IN it.Not from the FC or FB.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 05:03 PM
  #6  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
The flywheel yes, but if you are daily driving then stay steel. (ACT)
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 08:14 PM
  #7  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Due to the small diameter of the driveshaft, the benefits in terms of rotational inertia will be MUCH less than for a flywheel with an equivalent weight reduction. Also keep in mind that the driveshaft accelerates much slower than the engine does, so then again, the benefit will be MUCH less than for an equivalent reduction in the flywheel.

I'd only do it if I was in need of a new driveshaft anyway and the aluminum unit wasn't that much more expensive than a steel replacement. Then the real cost of the upgrade is only the difference between the two, then it MIGHT be worth it.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #8  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
For that kind of money you could buy a standalone, that would make improvements on your setup more then a driveshaft would. Remember, going from a stock flywheel to a lightweight aluminum one sheds more than 10 lbs of rotating inertia, and +1 about what Black91n/a said, flywheel will be way more noticeable.

So start there and see how much that pleases you, if you think it's worth it to add half of that performance again for double the price, you can make that decision afterwards.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #9  
vrracing's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 901
Likes: 1
From: Austin
Just an observation, we put the ACT Street lightened steel f/w on and it's fine but if you're going thru neighborhoods at the posted 25mph speed limit the f/w doesnt have enough inertia to go along smoothly in 2nd. Nothing major but mildly annoying.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 02:01 PM
  #10  
millertime6009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Black Beast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
I think Im gonna go with a flywheel and see how i like that. From what Ive read the stock is 22 lbs and ive seen lightened ones anywhere from 8-17 lbs. Im thinking 11-14 would be good for maintaining some drivability.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #11  
HotRodMex's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Originally Posted by millertime6009
I think Im gonna go with a flywheel and see how i like that. From what Ive read the stock is 22 lbs and ive seen lightened ones anywhere from 8-17 lbs. Im thinking 11-14 would be good for maintaining some drivability.
Don't the aftermarket flywheels not include the weight of the counter weight?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 04:52 PM
  #12  
pistones's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 6
From: nyc
aftermarket flywheel at 17lbs? i haven't seen one that weight. i have only seen 9 or 12lb. i currently have a 12lb and low speed driveability does take some time to get used to, it's not horrible but annoying sometimes. i want lighter than stock but not that light, maybe i am over exaggerating.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 05:00 PM
  #13  
rx-7 obsessed's Avatar
WTF is a Piston?..Anyone?
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
From: regina
Originally Posted by misterstyx69
Honestly the "bang for the Buck" factor for Lightening the Driveshaft Will not be Worth it.
I am Sure for 850 bucks you can get Some Nice coilovers and it will be an Investment that will be well worth it.
Mileage Sucks on a Rotary anyways.I hate to say it,But anything over 30 MPG is not going to Have Triangles IN it.Not from the FC or FB.
my s4 t2 gets 31 on the highway ciity is around 20
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 06:26 PM
  #14  
TitaniumTT's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
Due to the small diameter of the driveshaft, the benefits in terms of rotational inertia will be MUCH less than for a flywheel with an equivalent weight reduction. Also keep in mind that the driveshaft accelerates much slower than the engine does, so then again, the benefit will be MUCH less than for an equivalent reduction in the flywheel.

I'd only do it if I was in need of a new driveshaft anyway and the aluminum unit wasn't that much more expensive than a steel replacement. Then the real cost of the upgrade is only the difference between the two, then it MIGHT be worth it.
This man speaks the truth. I wouldn't waste my money on one

Originally Posted by pistones
aftermarket flywheel at 17lbs? i haven't seen one that weight. i have only seen 9 or 12lb. i currently have a 12lb and low speed driveability does take some time to get used to, it's not horrible but annoying sometimes. i want lighter than stock but not that light, maybe i am over exaggerating.
RB Steel = 17 lbs
RB AL = 12 lbs

Then there are a few co's out there that offer aluminum flywheels that are 8-9 lbs. Be smart about it though. A 9 lb solid flywheel is going to have less of an impact than a 9 lbs ACT flywheel with much of the outside material removed.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 06:36 PM
  #15  
RotaryWeaponSE7EN's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 3
From: Mission,KS
http://www.aascomotorsports.com/ makes a 8lb flywheel for the n/a rx7's. Had it on my 86 GXL made a big difference on acceleration.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
George84
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
8
Sep 28, 2015 11:58 PM
sinclair7seven
General Rotary Tech Support
11
Sep 11, 2015 10:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.