2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

which is the lightest Gen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 02:41 AM
  #1  
Elijah18's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Great Falls,MT
which is the lightest Gen?

Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 02:44 AM
  #2  
texFCturboII's Avatar
version 2.0
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,596
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
first
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 03:20 AM
  #3  
Killert2's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Grand prairie,Tx
86 is lightest 2nd gen
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 07:20 AM
  #4  
coxxoc's Avatar
Shooting for 500
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 833
Likes: 53
From: Redmond, WA
SA is the lightest as far as I know.

In terms of 2nd generation cars, the 86 sport model would be your best bet.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 07:34 AM
  #5  
Spectator's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
From: Canada
3rd gen fully equip is the Lightest.

Spec.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #6  
Apathy's Avatar
dAracIngPhaRmaCist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lauderdale
first gen is the lightest...
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #7  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
Originally Posted by coxxoc
SA is the lightest as far as I know.

In terms of 2nd generation cars, the 86 sport model would be your best bet.
86 base is actually lighter.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #8  
Jared FC's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
1st 2300-2500
2nd 2700-2800
3rd 2800
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #9  
89_Rx-7_GTUs's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Raytown, MO
aren't GTUs light?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #10  
BurlesonRX7's Avatar
back from the land of v8s
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
From: Burleson Tx
since your posting this in the 2nd gen forum.....

the 86/87 sport model with out the sun roof (if the sport even came with one)is the lightest 2nd gen. The TII wheels of that gen are the same weight as the 15" sport and lighter than the 15" BBS wheels (could be wrong about the BBS but I think I read that in the suspension section) The aluminum hood is tons lighter than the steel one (you can really tell when opening the hood). Unfortunately no one makes a replacement Lexan hatch for the 2nd gen.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #11  
daviddeep's Avatar
Rotary Powered Since 1995
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 2
From: Potomac, MD
Originally Posted by BurlesonRX7
The TII wheels of that gen are the same weight as the 15" sport and lighter than the 15" BBS wheels...
Not quite accurate. The S4 TII wheels (21 lb.) weigh almost twice what the 15" BBS 'Vert wheels (11 lb.) weigh. Although the FAQ doesn't have the weights on the S4 15" GXL/GTU wheels, I'm pretty sure they're somewhere between these two but not close to the S4 TII wheels. Now the S5 TII wheels (17 lb.) are a good bit lighter than those of the S4. All this info came from the FAQ:

https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/frequently-asked-questions-2nd-generation-rx-7-faq-fc-494667/

The GTUs is probably the lightest S5 car, but S5s are generally about 100-150 pounds heavier than their S4 counterparts.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #12  
TehMonkay's Avatar
Back in the game
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 2
From: Louisville KY
FB is lighter than SA.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 01:03 AM
  #13  
rxdash7's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: San Bruno, California
From Sports Car Color History by John Matras:

(curb weights in lbs.)

1979 2,420
1981 2,345
1984 (GSL-SE) 2,590
1986 2,625
1987 TII 2,845
1988 vert 3,003
1989 2,800
1991 TII 3,003
1993 (base) 2,789
(touring) 2,923

These numbers vary with options like air conditioning, of course. Generally however, the lightest car from the factory was the first gen car because it was the simplest by far. Surprisingly, the FB is lighter than the older SA because Mazda ditched the heavy-*** thermal reactor and heat exchanger for modern catalytic converters in 1981.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 01:07 AM
  #14  
MmSadda's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2
From: Columbus, OH
First gen.

Read the FAQs.

And it's ironic that you decided to post this in the 2nd gen thread, which were effectively the heaviest RX7s (n/as were heavier than the FBs which were n/a, TurboIIs were heavier than FD turbos.)
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 07:19 AM
  #15  
Roen's Avatar
The Silent but Deadly Mod
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 3
From: NYC/T.O.
Originally Posted by BurlesonRX7
since your posting this in the 2nd gen forum.....

the 86/87 sport model with out the sun roof (if the sport even came with one)is the lightest 2nd gen. The TII wheels of that gen are the same weight as the 15" sport and lighter than the 15" BBS wheels (could be wrong about the BBS but I think I read that in the suspension section) The aluminum hood is tons lighter than the steel one (you can really tell when opening the hood). Unfortunately no one makes a replacement Lexan hatch for the 2nd gen.
86 base is lighter than 86 sport. 86 sport is lighter than 87 sport.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 01:43 PM
  #16  
Healing's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
What makes the 86 base lighter than the 87 base, and 88 SE? I thought they were all the same (assuming similar options).
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 01:50 PM
  #17  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
The base model is technically the lightest, but that because it is 4-lug with lesser brake components, and maybe some other stuff I'm not aware of. The lightest of the 5-lugs is the 86 (and maybe 87) sport models, it is the most desirable in terms of weight.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #18  
Sammy Built's Avatar
501 WHP Club
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 521
Likes: 8
From: South Tampa
79 is the lightest 1st gen
86 base model is the lightest 2nd gen
on the third gens not really sure !!!!
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 06:56 PM
  #19  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Well the 3rd gens are the lightest of the turbo cars that we got in North America, but they're not the lightest overall. That might be what others meant by that.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 07:19 PM
  #20  
Hypertek's Avatar
Slowpoke
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 6
From: Socal
any reason for this question? i wouldnt let that be a deciding factor in purchasing an FC.. S4 base would be lacking what you might desire in a turbo S5 or gxl etc, single piston brakes, 5lug and lsd etc.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #21  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
The ideal way to go about it is to get an 86 sport and swap on the s5 intake, then you get the best of both worlds.

Or you could be difficult and get an base and do a full 5-lug swap like the previous owner of my car did....
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #22  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Almost, you're still missing all the good S5 internal engine bits.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
demetlaw
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Oct 2, 2015 06:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.