2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Less restrictive S4 MAF??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #1  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
Less restrictive S4 MAF??

is there a less restrictive MAF on the market or is there a way to make the existing MAF more efficient? The whole door/paddle thinger seems dumb to me IMO.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 01:25 AM
  #2  
StarScreaM2k1's Avatar
Rotax?! WTF is a Rotax!?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
apparently tho its better then the S5 ones. I think S5's can use the Mazda 929 ones. Not sure if we can. I suggest going with a Aftermarket ECU and getting rid of the AFM.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 02:00 AM
  #3  
walken's Avatar
Registered Loser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
From: Whiterock
No, unless you want to try porting it. Just move it closer to the TB.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 03:41 AM
  #4  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by walken
Just move it closer to the TB.
That won't make it any less restrictive. It will make it hotter though...
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #5  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
what kind of standalone aftermarket ECU would work well and be resonably priced?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #6  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Ouch, my brain...

First off, there isn't really anything wrong with the S4 AFM. I personally know several people with almost 400HP on the stock AFM, so it can't be all bad. And your NA GXL will never come close to maxing it out for flow. The S5 AFM is supposed to be worse then the S4 due to it's smaller diameter.

If you really, really want to get rid of the AFM, then something like the MAP-ECU is your only choice if you don't want to go full standalone. It's a small piggyback that repalces your AFM with a MAP sensor. For about $500. Does work reasonably well though...

Going further, there is a full standalone which completely replaces the stock EFI system. The price ranges from $140 to infinity with around $1000 being the norm. Keep in mind that it's a significant wiring job and then a good amount of time will be needed to make the car run properly (likely including dyno time).
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #7  
crazyasu's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Victoria
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Ouch, my brain...

First off, there isn't really anything wrong with the S4 AFM. I personally know several people with almost 400HP on the stock AFM, so it can't be all bad. And your NA GXL will never come close to maxing it out for flow. The S5 AFM is supposed to be worse then the S4 due to it's smaller diameter.

If you really, really want to get rid of the AFM, then something like the MAP-ECU is your only choice if you don't want to go full standalone. It's a small piggyback that repalces your AFM with a MAP sensor. For about $500. Does work reasonably well though...

Going further, there is a full standalone which completely replaces the stock EFI system. The price ranges from $140 to infinity with around $1000 being the norm. Keep in mind that it's a significant wiring job and then a good amount of time will be needed to make the car run properly (likely including dyno time).
if I remove my stock air intake and replace it with a CAI set-up...does the stock ECU automatically adjust the air/fuel ratio
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 02:32 AM
  #8  
staticguitar313's Avatar
R.I.P. Icemark
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1
From: gilbert, arizona
MegaSquirt Plug n' Play?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 08:36 AM
  #9  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
Originally Posted by crazyasu
if I remove my stock air intake and replace it with a CAI set-up...does the stock ECU automatically adjust the air/fuel ratio
no
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 09:06 AM
  #10  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
First off, there isn't really anything wrong with the S4 AFM.

This is true and I will have some dyno results to prove it in a few days when I get my dyno sheet emailed to me. There is this myth out there that the stock MAF is this super restrictive thing just waiting to be thrown away in order to give you gobs of horsepower, even on an N/A. Just tossing the AFM and going standalone (as compared to SAFC with CAS advanced) probably netted me 5hp with everything dialed in properly under WOT. The AFM does have its limits, but from personal experience it's not what everyone makes it out to be.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
R|©haźd
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Sep 24, 2015 11:39 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.