2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

intercooler thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 11:50 PM
  #1  
initial D is REAL!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena
intercooler thoughts

I have a greddy fmic. I used to have an aftermarket fiberglass bumper, but I destroyed it. :p Now I got a stock s5 bumper. I was thinking why I even need such a big intercooler if air isn't even passing by it. right? Maybe I need to make a shroud or something
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 11:59 PM
  #2  
R.O.D's Avatar
Forward, Always
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 4
From: [REDACTED]
pm'ed
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 08:57 PM
  #3  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by initial D is REAL!
I was thinking why I even need such a big intercooler if air isn't even passing by it. right?
Air is not supposed to pass by the intercooler, air is supposed to pass through it.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 09:40 PM
  #4  
K-Tune's Avatar
FD Daily
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 14
From: Gulf Breeze, FL
you really don't need a core the size of the newer greddy kit unless you are at or past the 350whp mark.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 12:04 PM
  #5  
initial D is REAL!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena
Sorry Aviator.

Just thinking the intercooler is so big, only half of the intercooler is exposed so air can pass through it.

So i'm trying ot think of ways to increase the efficiency of my setup.
Water sprayers on the outside
water meth injection at the turbo intake.

My old bumper used to have more of the intercooler exposed for air to pass through it
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 07:39 PM
  #6  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by initial D is REAL!
Sorry Aviator.

Just thinking the intercooler is so big, only half of the intercooler is exposed so air can pass through it.
In most cases the inlet is only supposed to be about 1/4 to 1/3 the area of the intercooler core. If the inlet is larger than 2/3 the area of the intercooler core, then flow efficiency is usually reduced because the air starts to back out of the inlet. The same applies to other heat exchangers, such as radiators and oil coolers. A large inlet will also increase drag, slowing the car.

See this race car duct as an example:
http://www.fivestarbodies.com/index....id=3&chapter=0
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 09:54 PM
  #7  
initial D is REAL!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena
Cool, good point, thanks man!
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 10:48 AM
  #8  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Also keep in mind that an intercooler is a thermal mass. The more metal you can cool down when driving under vacuum, the more effective it will be at pulling heat out of air when you are under boost as there is more cool surface area for that air to flow through. Street driving generally involves short periods of boost, so if the cooler is "pre-cooled" through it's entire mass, even though some areas don't receive as strong an airflow as others, the cooler is still more effective then a smaller one that is totally exposed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carpe_Diem_7
Build Threads
32
Mar 29, 2016 03:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.