2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Which intake manifold is best?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-08, 11:11 PM
  #1  
dewey

Thread Starter
 
katkaroto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 580
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Which intake manifold is best?

i know if you convert the na s4 intake manifold to the na s5 intake mainfold, you could gain 20hp.. so what about the na s4 intake manifold to the turbo s4 or s5 manifold without the turbo.. which gain would be more rewarding?
Old 05-24-08, 12:16 AM
  #2  
Becoming pure track...

iTrader: (1)
 
Rx7TyreBurna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason you would "gain" with the s5 system is because of the VDI system in the S5 intake.

google mazda vdi. There are a couple sites that explain it.

Turbo manifold..... I haven't heard of any gains. If you aren't going to turbo, S5 N/A would give you the best gains. But you need to find a way of actuating the VDI solenoid.

Old 05-24-08, 03:54 AM
  #3  
Top Down, Boost Up

iTrader: (7)
 
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Just to add, the hp gain with the S5 NA UIM is about 10hp on the top end, not 20hp. Here is the dyno chart showing the difference on Silver88GXL's car.

Last edited by RotaryRocket88; 05-24-08 at 04:00 AM.
Old 05-27-08, 12:28 PM
  #4  
dewey

Thread Starter
 
katkaroto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 580
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i am wondering if i close the six ports, and just use the VDI... will that work out or have them open all the time and let the vdi kick in too
Old 05-30-08, 11:44 AM
  #5  
Becoming pure track...

iTrader: (1)
 
Rx7TyreBurna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would be best to have the Aux open at 3800 and then have the VDI open around 5.8k? i think. I don't remember what mine is set at. all factory though.

If you wire you aux closed, you will lose a ton of power. And, if you open your VDI w/ your aux closed.... i don't know. weird power / no power.

Keep it close to factory. The engineers get paid a lot for a reason.
Old 05-30-08, 11:52 AM
  #6  
not a drifter

iTrader: (133)
 
87 t-66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 9,337
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
how do you plan on putting a 4 port turbo manifold onto a 6 port block?
Old 05-30-08, 11:58 AM
  #7  
dewey

Thread Starter
 
katkaroto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 580
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
how does that work anyways guys? so NAs are 6 port and turbos are 4 port? wouldnt the 6 port be better? more air equal more power, isnt that how supposedly the rotaries get more power?
Old 05-30-08, 12:28 PM
  #8  
not a drifter

iTrader: (133)
 
87 t-66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 9,337
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by katkaroto
how does that work anyways guys? so NAs are 6 port and turbos are 4 port? wouldnt the 6 port be better? more air equal more power, isnt that how supposedly the rotaries get more power?
yes, na=6port, turbo=4port. you can have the t2 lim modified to fit but i dont see the point unless you are going to put a turbo on.
Old 05-30-08, 01:04 PM
  #9  
dewey

Thread Starter
 
katkaroto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 580
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yea, i would understand that... but do ou gain more with the 6 port or its better to stick with the 4 port?
Old 05-30-08, 07:34 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California & Florida
Posts: 674
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You would gain power with the S5 NA VDI upper manifold only if all of your ports open properly. Making this happen reliably is the inherent problem of swapping the S5 manifold to the S4 engine. The S5 computer operates the ports & VDI with the airpump and computer controlled air solenoids. The S4 has no such provision. The S4 used exhaust back-pressure from the cat/exhaust system to activate the aux. actuators that turn the 5th & 6th port valves.

When you upgrade the exhaust on an S4 you now have a problem with aux. valve actuation. When you add the S5 VDI you have another air actuator valve to contend with that needs a different RPM # activation - 5200rpm - to work properly.
2 RPM switches can activate 2 air solenoids to accomplish this, but the problem is supplying the required air pressure. Some use electric air pumps, I use a mini air compressor and a pressure holding tank with a mini-pressure regulator so that I can pump up my pressure tank and have an ample reserve of pressure regulated air available for the solenoids to work the valves triggered by the 2 rpm switches.

I have a 0-15 psi boost gauge attatched to the output of the mini-pressure regulator and small LED's that give me the status of all the component parts. It was expensive to build - around $500 total. I had to have a pressure tank fabricated - $150 - rpm swithes & regulator & gauge with pod & line & fittings $300. $50 bucks for misc. stuff.

It works great & looks great & I can monitor all functions. My car runs like a rapped ape for an NA.

There are cheaper ways of doing it I suppose, but I'm happy with it.

Ramses666
Old 05-30-08, 08:41 PM
  #11  
NASA-MW ST4

iTrader: (7)
 
farberio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norcal, Bay Area
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
^ You spent $500 to get your VDI to work??? It was long and no cliffnotes.
Old 05-30-08, 09:45 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California & Florida
Posts: 674
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah...basically I spent alot of money - $500 - to make all of my ports work exactly like they should.... not really all that much if you think about it... I spent twice that on just the exhaust... half of that - $250 - for an S6 alternator. Stuff costs money... Hell... how much for 4 decent tires? Or 6 months insurance? At least I know what my ports are doing at all times... I don't have to guess or assume they are working. Why have an NA that doesn't work right? So what if I have to jump through a bunch of hoops & spend some $$$. It feels good to make it all work correctly when you modify or upgrade your 7. Why go half-way? It's not like someone can just buy a kit to make the ports all work exactly right. I could put one together but it would be expensive. I'd like to think that I get enough enjoyment out of watching it all work to make it worth the money.

Ramses666
Old 05-31-08, 04:15 AM
  #13  
Becoming pure track...

iTrader: (1)
 
Rx7TyreBurna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds cool. I went for a lumbar air pump, and summit racing RPM switch to activate.

.

$50 total.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
armans
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
09-06-15 09:02 PM



Quick Reply: Which intake manifold is best?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.