2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Which intake manifold is best?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2008 | 11:11 PM
  #1  
katkaroto's Avatar
Thread Starter
dewey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 580
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Which intake manifold is best?

i know if you convert the na s4 intake manifold to the na s5 intake mainfold, you could gain 20hp.. so what about the na s4 intake manifold to the turbo s4 or s5 manifold without the turbo.. which gain would be more rewarding?
Reply
Old May 24, 2008 | 12:16 AM
  #2  
Rx7TyreBurna's Avatar
Becoming pure track...
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, WA
The reason you would "gain" with the s5 system is because of the VDI system in the S5 intake.

google mazda vdi. There are a couple sites that explain it.

Turbo manifold..... I haven't heard of any gains. If you aren't going to turbo, S5 N/A would give you the best gains. But you need to find a way of actuating the VDI solenoid.

Reply
Old May 24, 2008 | 03:54 AM
  #3  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
Just to add, the hp gain with the S5 NA UIM is about 10hp on the top end, not 20hp. Here is the dyno chart showing the difference on Silver88GXL's car.

Last edited by RotaryRocket88; May 24, 2008 at 04:00 AM.
Reply
Old May 27, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #4  
katkaroto's Avatar
Thread Starter
dewey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 580
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
i am wondering if i close the six ports, and just use the VDI... will that work out or have them open all the time and let the vdi kick in too
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #5  
Rx7TyreBurna's Avatar
Becoming pure track...
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, WA
It would be best to have the Aux open at 3800 and then have the VDI open around 5.8k? i think. I don't remember what mine is set at. all factory though.

If you wire you aux closed, you will lose a ton of power. And, if you open your VDI w/ your aux closed.... i don't know. weird power / no power.

Keep it close to factory. The engineers get paid a lot for a reason.
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 11:52 AM
  #6  
87 t-66's Avatar
not a drifter
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (133)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 6
From: Columbus, Ohio
how do you plan on putting a 4 port turbo manifold onto a 6 port block?
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 11:58 AM
  #7  
katkaroto's Avatar
Thread Starter
dewey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 580
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
how does that work anyways guys? so NAs are 6 port and turbos are 4 port? wouldnt the 6 port be better? more air equal more power, isnt that how supposedly the rotaries get more power?
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #8  
87 t-66's Avatar
not a drifter
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (133)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 6
From: Columbus, Ohio
Originally Posted by katkaroto
how does that work anyways guys? so NAs are 6 port and turbos are 4 port? wouldnt the 6 port be better? more air equal more power, isnt that how supposedly the rotaries get more power?
yes, na=6port, turbo=4port. you can have the t2 lim modified to fit but i dont see the point unless you are going to put a turbo on.
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #9  
katkaroto's Avatar
Thread Starter
dewey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 580
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
yea, i would understand that... but do ou gain more with the 6 port or its better to stick with the 4 port?
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
From: California & Florida
You would gain power with the S5 NA VDI upper manifold only if all of your ports open properly. Making this happen reliably is the inherent problem of swapping the S5 manifold to the S4 engine. The S5 computer operates the ports & VDI with the airpump and computer controlled air solenoids. The S4 has no such provision. The S4 used exhaust back-pressure from the cat/exhaust system to activate the aux. actuators that turn the 5th & 6th port valves.

When you upgrade the exhaust on an S4 you now have a problem with aux. valve actuation. When you add the S5 VDI you have another air actuator valve to contend with that needs a different RPM # activation - 5200rpm - to work properly.
2 RPM switches can activate 2 air solenoids to accomplish this, but the problem is supplying the required air pressure. Some use electric air pumps, I use a mini air compressor and a pressure holding tank with a mini-pressure regulator so that I can pump up my pressure tank and have an ample reserve of pressure regulated air available for the solenoids to work the valves triggered by the 2 rpm switches.

I have a 0-15 psi boost gauge attatched to the output of the mini-pressure regulator and small LED's that give me the status of all the component parts. It was expensive to build - around $500 total. I had to have a pressure tank fabricated - $150 - rpm swithes & regulator & gauge with pod & line & fittings $300. $50 bucks for misc. stuff.

It works great & looks great & I can monitor all functions. My car runs like a rapped ape for an NA.

There are cheaper ways of doing it I suppose, but I'm happy with it.

Ramses666
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 08:41 PM
  #11  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
^ You spent $500 to get your VDI to work??? It was long and no cliffnotes.
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
From: California & Florida
Yeah...basically I spent alot of money - $500 - to make all of my ports work exactly like they should.... not really all that much if you think about it... I spent twice that on just the exhaust... half of that - $250 - for an S6 alternator. Stuff costs money... Hell... how much for 4 decent tires? Or 6 months insurance? At least I know what my ports are doing at all times... I don't have to guess or assume they are working. Why have an NA that doesn't work right? So what if I have to jump through a bunch of hoops & spend some $$$. It feels good to make it all work correctly when you modify or upgrade your 7. Why go half-way? It's not like someone can just buy a kit to make the ports all work exactly right. I could put one together but it would be expensive. I'd like to think that I get enough enjoyment out of watching it all work to make it worth the money.

Ramses666
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 04:15 AM
  #13  
Rx7TyreBurna's Avatar
Becoming pure track...
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, WA
Sounds cool. I went for a lumbar air pump, and summit racing RPM switch to activate.

.

$50 total.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
armans
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Sep 6, 2015 09:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.