2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
View Poll Results: intake manifold
89-91 intake manifold
9
69.23%
86-88 intake manifold
4
30.77%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

intake manifold 89-91 or 86-88

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2002 | 07:37 PM
  #1  
rx-7fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: oakland Ca
intake manifold 89-91 or 86-88

i just put a 89-91 intake manifold and i an thinking about putting my old intake manifold back on my 86 because people say if you don't get the vdi working you will lose hp and right now i don't have it working i just have it wired open and are there any things that i should know about the 89-91 manifold or put the old one back one
Reply
Old May 11, 2002 | 11:33 PM
  #2  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Any engine mods? specifically, porting? I can't decide until then.
Reply
Old May 11, 2002 | 11:46 PM
  #3  
rx-7fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: oakland Ca
mods:racing beat headers road race,K&N air filter,tbmod,
one high flow cat but thinking of taking it out,msd spark plug wires 8.5,no a/c,no acv.
Reply
Old May 11, 2002 | 11:49 PM
  #4  
rx-7fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: oakland Ca
and how do you put in a RPM switch from summitracing to get the vdi to work
Reply
Old May 11, 2002 | 11:57 PM
  #5  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by rx-7fc
mods:racing beat headers road race,K&N air filter,tbmod,
one high flow cat but thinking of taking it out,msd spark plug wires 8.5,no a/c,no acv.
no catback, intake manifold porting, or engine porting? 89-91 intake would be better.
I'll get back to you on the VDI actuation. I am not as good with S5 NA cars as I am with Turbo cars, but I was under the impression the VDI opened from pressure. Well, what you could do is plumb the vacuum line into your air pump (and also use the air pump to actuate the auxilary ports), and then use an emission solenoid of a parts car and the rpm switch to activate it.

The RPM switch simply wires into your ignition system to read spark, and then sends out a 12V signal whenever the rpm determined by the "pill" is reached. This 12V signal would open the soleoind and allow the pressure to open the VDI.

I'll read my FSM and get back to your with any more info I can come up with.
Sean Cathcart
Reply
Old May 12, 2002 | 12:02 AM
  #6  
rx-7fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: oakland Ca
i can do porting on the intake manifold because i have to take it off because of a vacuum leak and i don't know if it has a catback
Reply
Old May 12, 2002 | 11:40 AM
  #7  
rx-7fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: oakland Ca
bump
Reply
Old May 12, 2002 | 02:13 PM
  #8  
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Antioch,CA
why did you put the newer intake on anyways? Did someone tell you that they were better? I know the 90-92 engines are better because of higher compression and lighter rotors/flywheel(more power & performance) but just putting the intake from a 90 onto an older 13b is not guarantee to get the same performance. The intake does look different but I have no idea if it really is better or not.

dav
Reply
Old May 13, 2002 | 10:57 PM
  #9  
rx-7fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: oakland Ca
bump
Reply
Old May 14, 2002 | 03:15 PM
  #10  
blu_gxl's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: rock me amadeus...
yes it will give better performance some people have done the swap and all say they have gotten a gain. i believe though you won't realize the ful gain unless you have the vdi working or wired open like he has, some people wire the vdi open i don't know why for sure but i'm guessing it's because the stop functioning properly.
also there is a write up some where on how to do the swap and rpm activation via the switch i'll see if i can find it
here it is http://homepage.mac.com/carldavis/intake/intro.html
enjoy

james
Reply
Old May 14, 2002 | 03:18 PM
  #11  
dre_2ooo's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
If you feel a kick at 5.5k, it's working.

Get a ported 89-91 intake with free flowing exhaust. Will probably gain you 25-30+ hp from the stock 146.
Reply
Old May 14, 2002 | 03:32 PM
  #12  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
Originally posted by avrfan
why did you put the newer intake on anyways? Did someone tell you that they were better? I know the 90-92 engines are better because of higher compression and lighter rotors/flywheel(more power & performance) but just putting the intake from a 90 onto an older 13b is not guarantee to get the same performance. The intake does look different but I have no idea if it really is better or not.

dav
Where did you hear that? I have seen a few dynos of S4's before and after putting on an S5 manifold. The results? 10-11 RWHP every time, no porting or anything. Just wsapping out the manifolds. Not to mention the extended powerband from the variable runners. Compression only accounts for 4% increase in hp for every point the compression is raised. Mazda raised the compression from 9.4 to 9.7 in the n/a's. That accounts for 2.3 hp of the 14 hp increase from 88 to 89. The lighter rotors might make another hp or two. But the biggest factor int he power bump was the intake manifold.

Putting an S5 manifold on an S4 is definately worth it. Not only does it add a dyno proven 10 rwhp, it also extends the powerband. And thats without porting. Porting the S5 manifolds makes a HUGE difference. Just ask PP13bnos or dre 2000.
Reply
Old May 14, 2002 | 04:33 PM
  #13  
silverrotor's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
A fellow RX-7 owner had done the same conversion on his 86'. He claimed that-yes you do gain 8-10 hp, but thats only at 7000rpm. Also, even before 4000rpm, he had actually lost 10hp. His dyno sheet speaks for Itself. He had the VDI hooked up to an RPM Switch and also mods to his Intake and exhaust were done. But that Is besides the point.

Quite simply, power gains are their, but after 7000rpm and a lose of power below 4000 rpm are lost. He had the exact same write up as what blue gxl has. Many RX-7 owners have bee disappointed of the Series V Intake swap, so they re-converted.

I hope this helps!
Reply
Old May 14, 2002 | 10:08 PM
  #14  
rx-7fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: oakland Ca
i might think about porting the manifold sice it is out the car right now
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
armans
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Sep 6, 2015 09:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.