Intake Adaptor for more low end power
#1
Rotary Power Information
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Hampshire, Greenfield
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Intake Adaptor for more low end power
Below is a link to MAzdaFC.com.
You will see the drawring of the adaptor I thought up. I think it would work. Check it out.
http://mazdafc.com/modules.php?name=...pic&t=183#3634
Justin
You will see the drawring of the adaptor I thought up. I think it would work. Check it out.
http://mazdafc.com/modules.php?name=...pic&t=183#3634
Justin
#6
Rotary Power Information
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Hampshire, Greenfield
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah basically the same as the RENESIS 3(?) stage intake manifold...
Primaries only, then secondaries, then the 5th and 6th ports...
Primaries only, then secondaries, then the 5th and 6th ports...
So pretty much it's just a riser?to lengthen the runners?
Yeah with butterfly valves in the secondary runners to close them off at low RPMS.
Justin
Trending Topics
#8
Rotary Power Information
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Hampshire, Greenfield
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Acutally probably not, but keep us updated with the results.
How Come? im always looking for more ideas
Justin
Last edited by ViperDude152; 02-17-04 at 05:20 PM.
#9
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think on a stock port engine you might not see much, if any, gains. But I think you opened up the motor and changed the porting a bit you might see some better gains.
Anyone have any info on the timming of the rx-8 intake ports?
The stock primary ports on our engines just seem way to small to me to make any power over 1,500rpm! they're tiny! but hey I could be wrong, i usually am
Anyone have any info on the timming of the rx-8 intake ports?
The stock primary ports on our engines just seem way to small to me to make any power over 1,500rpm! they're tiny! but hey I could be wrong, i usually am
#10
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
Mazda spent quite a lot of time and money developing the FC intake manfold, especially on the S5. I doubt there is anything you can do to improve it. Indeed, modifications to the S5 manifold often result in power loss.
Also, the Renesis uses a completely different lower manifold, and the port size and shape isn't even close. For all intents and purposes, it is a completely different engine.
Also, unless you can provide dyno pulls that proves keeping the secondary throttle plates closed generates more torque, I don't believe you.
Also, the Renesis uses a completely different lower manifold, and the port size and shape isn't even close. For all intents and purposes, it is a completely different engine.
Also, unless you can provide dyno pulls that proves keeping the secondary throttle plates closed generates more torque, I don't believe you.
#12
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rxseven
And the renesis doesn't exactly produce a good deal of low end torque anyway.
And the renesis doesn't exactly produce a good deal of low end torque anyway.
#14
Rotary Power Information
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Hampshire, Greenfield
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
think on a stock port engine you might not see much, if any, gains. But I think you opened up the motor and changed the porting a bit you might see some better gains.
Anyone have any info on the timming of the rx-8 intake ports?
The stock primary ports on our engines just seem way to small to me to make any power over 1,500rpm! they're tiny! but hey I could be wrong, i usually am
Anyone have any info on the timming of the rx-8 intake ports?
The stock primary ports on our engines just seem way to small to me to make any power over 1,500rpm! they're tiny! but hey I could be wrong, i usually am
Justin
#15
Rotary Power Information
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Hampshire, Greenfield
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This Post is an Edited Version of the Above post. This stupid Forum runs to damn slow and I wasnt going to wait for 5 minutes for the stupid thing to finish
---
I cant make you belive me but I feel a power difference when only the primary ports are open. Its not anything to jump up and down for. but there was an increase.
Mazda did alot of developing on the FC intake. and you wonder why they are now keeping the secondary ports closed and low rpms on the Rx8. Basically for the same reason I am keeping them closed. Even tho the rx8 has a different intake system. Its based on the same design
But like I said before i have no dyno proof and wont have any till I make it.
Justin
---
I cant make you belive me but I feel a power difference when only the primary ports are open. Its not anything to jump up and down for. but there was an increase.
Mazda did alot of developing on the FC intake. and you wonder why they are now keeping the secondary ports closed and low rpms on the Rx8. Basically for the same reason I am keeping them closed. Even tho the rx8 has a different intake system. Its based on the same design
But like I said before i have no dyno proof and wont have any till I make it.
Justin
#16
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
The Renesis is a completely different engine. You can't even campare the intakes. Take a look at some of the technical drawings of the port size, shape, location and the intake/injection system and you will see what I mean.
#17
13B N/A POWA!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Everywhere, WRLD
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True the ports and all that are completely different, but it's still the same concept. I do agree that porting the motor would yeild better results with a new manifold design since the primaries are small. But I'd love to see some results of this study...I'm sure they're be positive.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
09-05-15 10:23 AM