2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

I think my engine is bust....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 06:16 PM
  #1  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
I think my engine is bust....

Here it is guys I need your opinion. When I compression checked the car it measured 60 psi consistently on every bounce on each rotor.

This engine is pieced together out of FD twin turbo housings with RX8 rotating assemblies (rotors & crankshaft and seals). The engine is NA.

I've removed the exhaust manifold and manually pushed each apex seal and it was springy consistently across all seals.





Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 12:40 AM
  #2  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
bump
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 01:13 AM
  #3  
3vil's Avatar
Mazda Misfit
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 574
Likes: 1
From: Springtuckey
how many miles since you put it all together (has it had time to break in and get a good seal)?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 01:24 AM
  #4  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
its got like 250 miles on the motor
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 01:36 AM
  #5  
bumpstart's Avatar
talking head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 15
From: Perth, WA, OZ
my feelings are you have a very consistant pulse on all faces ( good news )
and it maybe just method, or equipment that is the cause for the low reading


did you test from trailing plug with a strong battery and earth with the throttle wide open?

did you let the shrader go and let it pump to a peak value
( it often goes higher when the valve is released , you should use the shrader in method to count pulses and shrader out method to find the peak pressure )

if you did this on a rotary engine compression tester you may find its up a bit higher than with an unknown potentially dodgy pressure gauge
- this is because the pressure transducer sees the combustion pressure without the pressure drop of hose and shrader valve restriction in the way
( and is also compensated on a chart against RPM if you use a mazda tester )
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 02:41 AM
  #6  
2slow4stock's Avatar
The waiting game......
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 3
From: North Aurora
What did you check your compression with.?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #7  
BomberMan's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Amherst, Massachusetts
I didn't think 60 psi on each rotor face to be low, in fact I think that is quite high. Or are you talking about 60 psi on each rotor as a whole? Make sure you're doing the test right. Or rather don't do it at all. Unless your engine was built with brand new housings, you can expect to have relatively low compression until the break-in is near complete, so I wouldn't even bother compression testing for awhile unless the engine can't be started.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 09:32 PM
  #8  
K-Tune's Avatar
FD Daily
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 14
From: Gulf Breeze, FL
Why do you think your engine is bad?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:07 PM
  #9  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by bumpstart
my feelings are you have a very consistant pulse on all faces ( good news )
and it maybe just method, or equipment that is the cause for the low reading


did you test from trailing plug with a strong battery and earth with the throttle wide open?

did you let the shrader go and let it pump to a peak value
( it often goes higher when the valve is released , you should use the shrader in method to count pulses and shrader out method to find the peak pressure )

if you did this on a rotary engine compression tester you may find its up a bit higher than with an unknown potentially dodgy pressure gauge
- this is because the pressure transducer sees the combustion pressure without the pressure drop of hose and shrader valve restriction in the way
( and is also compensated on a chart against RPM if you use a mazda tester )

I used a SEARS compression tester and removed the little valve at the bottom.
I was reading 3 equal bounces of 60 psi of the trailing spark plug holes on both rotors.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:08 PM
  #10  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by K-Tune
Why do you think your engine is bad?
It got flooded and its hard to start.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:09 PM
  #11  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by BomberMan
I didn't think 60 psi on each rotor face to be low, in fact I think that is quite high. Or are you talking about 60 psi on each rotor as a whole? Make sure you're doing the test right. Or rather don't do it at all. Unless your engine was built with brand new housings, you can expect to have relatively low compression until the break-in is near complete, so I wouldn't even bother compression testing for awhile unless the engine can't be started.
Each bounce, not as a whole.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:17 PM
  #12  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
I'm currently in a middle of taring the intake and vacuum system apart and replacing all hoses and gaskets.
The problem is during starting it is hard to get it to work without the motor just simply shutting off even with the pedal depressed 1/4. When warmed up it runs fine.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #13  
bumpstart's Avatar
talking head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 15
From: Perth, WA, OZ
Originally Posted by JK5S
I'm currently in a middle of taring the intake and vacuum system apart and replacing all hoses and gaskets.
The problem is during starting it is hard to get it to work without the motor just simply shutting off even with the pedal depressed 1/4. When warmed up it runs fine.
sounds like the issue is actually in the tune or in the temp sender or simply crapped plugs
( and a little disclaimer as to potential for a coolant leak issue )

cold compression is usually higher than hot ,,
( argue that all you like , then go and test one ! )

and hot starting OK is a great sign the engine is fine but the cold tune sucks
( again a small disclaimer for coolant seal issues )

i think you need a CO litmus test and a leakdown pressure test of your coolant system to rule out the engine being coolant flooded when cold

you then need check the cold signal from the thermo sender
and then to retune any aftermarket ECU in the cold running and crank maps
and an injector clean and check also wouldnt go as wasted money
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:30 PM
  #14  
K-Tune's Avatar
FD Daily
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 14
From: Gulf Breeze, FL
Sounds like you are grasping at straws... Considering the compression numbers and age of the build it's doubtful that the motor is mechanically flawed. It's more likely a problem with your fuel/timing.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:44 PM
  #15  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by bumpstart
you then need check the cold signal from the thermo sender
and then to retune any aftermarket ECU in the cold running and crank maps
and an injector clean and check also wouldnt go as wasted money
I have the injectors out and will be cleaning the fuel injectors.
What do you mean with retune of the aftermarket ECU, I have none.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 12:49 AM
  #16  
bumpstart's Avatar
talking head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 15
From: Perth, WA, OZ
well, since you didnt state in the OP that you had aftermarket ECU or not , i put that in to cover all bases

if you are stock ECU,, ( s4 or s5??? ) you have some scope to trim the mixtures at the AFM ( s5 ) or at the trim pot beside it ( s4 )
but to me its sounding like perhaps a leaky injector or a suss coolant sender or as hinting, coolant leak
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 11:09 AM
  #17  
BomberMan's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Amherst, Massachusetts
Originally Posted by bumpstart
well, since you didnt state in the OP that you had aftermarket ECU or not , i put that in to cover all bases

if you are stock ECU,, ( s4 or s5??? ) you have some scope to trim the mixtures at the AFM ( s5 ) or at the trim pot beside it ( s4 )
but to me its sounding like perhaps a leaky injector or a suss coolant sender or as hinting, coolant leak
Or... it could just be that this guy has a new engine that will run like **** until it is properly broken in. I mean seriously, he said it only has 250 miles on it.

If it was me, and I was scared, I would get an AFR gauge to make sure I didn't run lean and just DRIVE IT a lot. Trying to diagnose fuel system problems by the effects you see on an engine that hasn't been broken in, is like trying to get surgery instructions on a cell phone with bad reception. You could guess what it is that you need to do, or you could wait and try to get a better signal.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 11:30 AM
  #18  
Hazard15301's Avatar
Rotor Junkie
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 1
From: Washington, PA
Yea doesn't a rebuild need a minimum of 500 miles on it to be considered properly broken in?

I know when I rebuilt my first engine, it was very hard to start, but gradually got better as the seals wore in place.

I recall that it depends on what all you reuse in the build too.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 11:46 AM
  #19  
kgracom's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Moorpark, ca
That sounds a lot like the problem I have. I found the majority of it was coming from a faulty tps. There was also a bad coil but I would check out the tps man.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 02:59 PM
  #20  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Thanks you guys, I will keep you posted on my diagnostics once the intake system has been resembled. Anyone know where I can find a intake manifold gasket set for a good price?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 03:29 PM
  #21  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Do you guys think I would need one of these for making the engine operate properly? Currently I have racing beat headers on the engine so its not like it will benefit me one bit to have it. The intake manifold is plunged in that the area where ACV typically sits.
Attached Thumbnails I think my engine is bust....-air-controll-valve.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 10:19 PM
  #22  
bumpstart's Avatar
talking head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 15
From: Perth, WA, OZ
nope, ACV and EGR if faulty can bring its own problems, leave it off
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 10:48 PM
  #23  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
So I understand a unplugged/faulty termo sensor could cause a majority of hard starting. Causes the ecu to go to its basic fuel map and not account for cold starting.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 11:05 PM
  #24  
MadScience_7's Avatar
Too old for this
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Don't forget altitude correction. I don't know what altitude SLC is at, but for me in Denver, 60PSI fits close to the correction factor in the FSM. I've been having the same problem, but I've just put in a fuel cut switch and accepted that it won't work right until I can get an aftermarket ECU. The RTek doesn't support adjusting the cranking mixture for S4 N/A though, so I'll have to save up for a year or so to get a real standalone.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 11:46 PM
  #25  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by MadScience_7
Don't forget altitude correction. I don't know what altitude SLC is at, but for me in Denver, 60PSI fits close to the correction factor in the FSM. I've been having the same problem, but I've just put in a fuel cut switch and accepted that it won't work right until I can get an aftermarket ECU. The RTek doesn't support adjusting the cranking mixture for S4 N/A though, so I'll have to save up for a year or so to get a real standalone.
You are about 1000 feet higher than SLC , so there is something to be said about altitude differential. So, what does your fuel cutout switch do for you?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.