i have some questions about porting
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: buffalo grove IL
i have some questions about porting
how much power can i gain from each respecting port (street, semi peripheral and bridge port)? my power goals are about 190 to 200 to the wheels. im goin more towards a streetport because of the reliability and because its goin to be my DD
you won't get that with a street port, a bridge port yes but you'll get crap gas millage and will be loud, but some people do drive their 7's with a bridgeport on a day to day basis. if its just going to be a DD than street port is best.
bridgeport requires a standalone EMS, which run about $1500 on top of your rebuild and porting costs.
bridgeports don't eat engines or cut into their longevity much, that is a myth.
bridgeports don't eat engines or cut into their longevity much, that is a myth.
Last edited by RotaryEvolution; Dec 12, 2010 at 01:59 PM.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: buffalo grove IL
Rtek 2.1 is the cheapest for the n/a, if you learn to tune it yourself. haltech/microtech/PowerFC all have their pros and cons for tuners and can manage similar results for real standalones that omit the antique AFM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: buffalo grove IL
I dont think it has been done before, so cant really say.
Though, I dont see why not, it probably can run it and do well.
Though I would think the MAF restriction will pose a problem since the Rtek requires the MAF to be there, many standalones use Map sensors instead of the MAF, which is better since it doesnt restrict airflow.
Though, I dont see why not, it probably can run it and do well.
Though I would think the MAF restriction will pose a problem since the Rtek requires the MAF to be there, many standalones use Map sensors instead of the MAF, which is better since it doesnt restrict airflow.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: buffalo grove IL
I dont think it has been done before, so cant really say.
Though, I dont see why not, it probably can run it and do well.
Though I would think the MAF restriction will pose a problem since the Rtek requires the MAF to be there, many standalones use Map sensors instead of the MAF, which is better since it doesnt restrict airflow.
Though, I dont see why not, it probably can run it and do well.
Though I would think the MAF restriction will pose a problem since the Rtek requires the MAF to be there, many standalones use Map sensors instead of the MAF, which is better since it doesnt restrict airflow.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: buffalo grove IL
everything, even standalones have a tough time with the overlap where low vacuum crosses over into load at low RPMs. basically the ECU thinks the engine isunder a load when it is simply idling, when it does actually go into load it is then too lean. the faster the electricals react, the better.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: buffalo grove IL
everything, even standalones have a tough time with the overlap where low vacuum crosses over into load at low RPMs. basically the ECU thinks the engine isunder a load when it is simply idling, when it does actually go into load it is then too lean. the faster the electricals react, the better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






