i have some questions about porting
12-10-10, 03:47 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: buffalo grove IL
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have some questions about porting
how much power can i gain from each respecting port (street, semi peripheral and bridge port)? my power goals are about 190 to 200 to the wheels. im goin more towards a streetport because of the reliability and because its goin to be my DD
12-10-10, 03:51 PM
#2
rx7 almost a religon
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2010
Location: aurora colorado
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you won't get that with a street port, a bridge port yes but you'll get crap gas millage and will be loud, but some people do drive their 7's with a bridgeport on a day to day basis. if its just going to be a DD than street port is best.
12-12-10, 01:40 PM
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: buffalo grove IL
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i saw i site a long time ago describing the kind of ports does anyone have a similar site? and how much to the wheel would i get wit a bridge port?
Trending Topics
12-18-10, 12:24 PM
#12
I dont think it has been done before, so cant really say.
Though, I dont see why not, it probably can run it and do well.
Though I would think the MAF restriction will pose a problem since the Rtek requires the MAF to be there, many standalones use Map sensors instead of the MAF, which is better since it doesnt restrict airflow.
Though, I dont see why not, it probably can run it and do well.
Though I would think the MAF restriction will pose a problem since the Rtek requires the MAF to be there, many standalones use Map sensors instead of the MAF, which is better since it doesnt restrict airflow.
12-18-10, 12:30 PM
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: buffalo grove IL
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont think it has been done before, so cant really say.
Though, I dont see why not, it probably can run it and do well.
Though I would think the MAF restriction will pose a problem since the Rtek requires the MAF to be there, many standalones use Map sensors instead of the MAF, which is better since it doesnt restrict airflow.
Though, I dont see why not, it probably can run it and do well.
Though I would think the MAF restriction will pose a problem since the Rtek requires the MAF to be there, many standalones use Map sensors instead of the MAF, which is better since it doesnt restrict airflow.
12-18-10, 03:16 PM
#17
everything, even standalones have a tough time with the overlap where low vacuum crosses over into load at low RPMs. basically the ECU thinks the engine isunder a load when it is simply idling, when it does actually go into load it is then too lean. the faster the electricals react, the better.
12-18-10, 03:23 PM
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: buffalo grove IL
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
everything, even standalones have a tough time with the overlap where low vacuum crosses over into load at low RPMs. basically the ECU thinks the engine isunder a load when it is simply idling, when it does actually go into load it is then too lean. the faster the electricals react, the better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post