2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

How much power are you guys puttin' down?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2002 | 03:34 PM
  #26  
Erik's Avatar
Best of both worlds
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally posted by Stevo970
no there not i went looking for cars awhile back and the Si's Crx's had DOHC and where vtec's look it up
lol...whatever man...even the other honda guy agrees with me
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2002 | 04:38 PM
  #27  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally posted by Stevo970
no there not i went looking for cars awhile back and the Si's Crx's had DOHC and where vtec's look it up
Dude, thats an Si-R, a CRX THAT WASN'T SOLD IN AMERICA! We got the CRX Si, they have a gimp little 1.6 SOHC NON VTEC with about 130 hp.

I hope my car ends up with about 230 at the wheels, but I dunno how strong my engine is yet. I need to do a compression check
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2002 | 05:10 PM
  #28  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
ummmm no the early crx si's where weak as hell with the stock engine I don't even know what they put in it stock. The zc was in japan I think the crx in america got a d series. Now the b16a2 swap is very common into the crx's because they are so light.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2002 | 02:58 PM
  #29  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo, MI
Eric

stock a '89 is 160 hp and 140torque. So It was running better then Mazdas claimed

by the way '89 turbo was 200hp and 196torque
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2002 | 03:09 PM
  #30  
Erik's Avatar
Best of both worlds
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Re: Eric

Originally posted by thomasmeisch
stock a '89 is 160 hp and 140torque. So It was running better then Mazdas claimed

by the way '89 turbo was 200hp and 196torque
yeah, but are these actual RWHP figures from a dyno? or just flywheel numbers from say a gtech?

i know what the factory specs are...but to get 168 RWHP stock outta ANY n/a rex is a little far fetched. if you had a dyno chart then i'd believe it

i hope i'm not annoying...i'm just trying to figure how thats possible when a normal n/a usually puts down 130 RWHP stock
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2002 | 03:46 PM
  #31  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo, MI
vert hp

note the '89 tii is 200hp alot higher then my 176!!!!!
This is a fly wheel rating

I wonder what rwhp is on a TII and N/A

Last edited by thomasmeisch; Jan 25, 2002 at 03:49 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tylerx7fb
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
39
May 27, 2019 12:45 PM
Clacor
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
Aug 14, 2015 09:17 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.