2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Hot wire Maf conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-08, 06:23 AM
  #1  
Only RX7 for miles!

Thread Starter
 
tigerboy rei i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Davison, MI
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hot wire Maf conversion

I know it can be done, just wanted some help figuring out how to complete it. I know of one other person attempting this with a Mustang 5.0 MAF, although I haven't heard anything from it since.
Old 12-04-08, 09:11 AM
  #2  
HAILERS

 
HAILERS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
'cause it can't be done
Old 12-04-08, 06:10 PM
  #3  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Despite performing the same function, a flapper-type air flow meter and a hot wire mass air flow meter operate on different electronic principles. It is similar to how a narrowband O2 sensor and wideband O2 sensor are not compatible even though they serve the same function. Therefore, you can't convert to a MAF unless you install a computer that can control the MAF sensor element.
Old 12-08-08, 07:45 AM
  #4  
Only RX7 for miles!

Thread Starter
 
tigerboy rei i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Davison, MI
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about This Page? Is it feasable in any way?

I mean, sounds like a lot of research and computer stuff, but I'm a nerd and have too much time on my hands. I guess if I want to try to replicate this I'd just have log the voltage and resistances, and write a formula to fit, then program it for the chip. I've access to a newish digital scope hooked up to a computer, so logging might be easy, and plotting all the necessary graphs and calculating the formula will be easy. It's just the programming of some sort of micro controller that'll be rough.

Last edited by tigerboy rei i; 12-08-08 at 08:11 AM.
Old 12-08-08, 08:30 AM
  #5  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
just run a stand alone ECu and youll be worlds ahead.

or just remove it with the MAP ecu.
Old 12-08-08, 09:35 AM
  #6  
dewey

 
katkaroto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 580
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
this kinda sounds like what the next rtek ecu is going to be like...
Old 12-08-08, 09:50 AM
  #7  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Anything can be done with enough time and money wasted. The reason it is not done is because it is of dubious benefit.

If you really want a DIY project that will allow you unlimited choices in engine peripherals and complete tunability, get a Megasquirt.
Old 12-08-08, 10:35 AM
  #8  
Wire monkey

 
prof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Camberley, Surrey, UK
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe someone on the forum was selling a device to do just that.

From what I've researched - both MAF and AFM provide a non linear signal - but the MAF has a rising voltage with airflow (rising most at the start of the graph) and the AFM has a falling voltage (when referenced at the ECU measuring pin - and again falling most at the start of the graph). The subtle problems are the fact that the MAF values will change with air temp, since that's how the hot wire sensor works. If you could 'normalize' the curve with temperature and use an IAT sensor then it should be possible for a microcontroller (such as PIC or AVR) to take the input from a MAF and mimick the expected input to the ECU.

From my observations with the Emanage logging the AFM signal on a series 5 (that's the cone shaped AFM), the reading hits 0 volts at around 12 psi, but the stock ECU is using the MAP sensor by then to control fuelling, it seems the AFM has more use in the vacuum and lower boost parts of the map - where it gives the largest change in voltage against airflow. I suspect you'd be able to get a better tune in the lower parts of the map with an AFM, rather than doing speed density with just a MAP sensor - but that's just my thoughts.

If you're making a daily driver then I'd keep the AFM or look to do a conversion, if you're making a race / drag car just ditch it and use a standalone or piggyback to get rid of it.
Old 12-08-08, 04:32 PM
  #9  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Anything can be done with enough time and money wasted. The reason it is not done is because it is of dubious benefit.
Dubious benefit? So you see no benefit in being able to brag that you spent countless hours and $50 in junk yard and Radio Shack parts in order run your engine off of the SAME non-tunable, nasty, POS, 8-bit, 1984-vintage stock computer? You could even 'upgrade' by spending $400 on an Rtek and run the engine off of the SAME tunable, nasty, POS, 8-bit, 1984-vintage stock computer! Just think, as they blow past you in their faster cars, you could laugh at all of the suckers who spent $1,000 on a real EMS.

Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
If you really want a DIY project that will allow you unlimited choices in engine peripherals and complete tunability, get a Megasquirt.
Shhhh, don't tell the noobs that the Megasquirt II can work with a MAF sensor.
Old 12-09-08, 12:27 AM
  #10  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
MAF sensors effectively have an integrated IAT function in them. They don't need a separate IAT like the older flapper-style meters. The factory ECU will still apply separate IAT correction however unless you remove the IAT and install a resistor in its place. The final result is still just not very useful. Scaling MAF sensors is a bitch when you start modding a car. The MAF sensor used on the STi's and Rx-8 can be a huge pain to deal with once you start doing custom intakes. They have to be carefully calibrated and carefully positioned in the intakes stream or they make the car run like ****.

Search Bosch L-Jetronic online. It is the forefather of modern MAF-based systems, and is essentially the engine management system that 80s japanese cars run (there are several variants). Also search Bosch D-Jetronic. That is the forefather of speed-density systems most common on standalones, one of earliest of which was in the Porsche 914.
Old 12-09-08, 09:48 AM
  #11  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Dubious benefit? So you see no benefit in being able to brag that you spent countless hours and $50 in junk yard and Radio Shack parts in order run your engine off of the SAME non-tunable, nasty, POS, 8-bit, 1984-vintage stock computer? You could even 'upgrade' by spending $400 on an Rtek and run the engine off of the SAME tunable, nasty, POS, 8-bit, 1984-vintage stock computer! Just think, as they blow past you in their faster cars, you could laugh at all of the suckers who spent $1,000 on a real EMS.
It's teal, the colour of sarcasm.

Shhhh, don't tell the noobs that the Megasquirt II can work with a MAF sensor.
I believe the MSI supports an AFM as well, though the feature has been listed as "beta" for several years.

Originally Posted by arghx
MAF sensors effectively have an integrated IAT function in them. They don't need a separate IAT like the older flapper-style meters.
Just to nitpick, but the flapper style AFM also has a temperature sensor.

Search Bosch L-Jetronic online. It is the forefather of modern MAF-based systems, and is essentially the engine management system that 80s japanese cars run (there are several variants).
And is the system used in the 1st and 2nd gen RX-7.

Also search Bosch D-Jetronic. That is the forefather of speed-density systems most common on standalones, one of earliest of which was in the Porsche 914.
D-Jetronic is the bastard child of EFI systems designed by Lucifer himself. No human in their right mind would ever design an inductive MAP sensor...ever. Therefore it was designed by the Devil.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
10-14-15 12:31 PM
blackball7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
34
09-16-15 10:10 AM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
09-09-15 05:24 PM
Enzo1944
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
09-06-15 08:57 AM



Quick Reply: Hot wire Maf conversion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.