2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Horsepower 125.8????????? wtf??!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-09, 03:03 PM
  #26  
Junior Member

 
fc3s690's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Barnhart
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
when I had my 90gxl I dynoed 180hp to the wheels. that was with a fresh rebuild, full rb exhaust and a drop in K&N filter. Oh yea I polished the intake runners too. It was still slow lol
Old 12-22-09, 03:15 PM
  #27  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Without a standalone you won't be able to take advantage of that intake. Also those runners are insanely short and will probably start making power at 11K or so.

From the video it looks like you have the stock exhaust manifold? You'll never make any power with that thing.

An S-AFC won't be able to tune this very well. You need a standalone.
Old 12-22-09, 03:43 PM
  #28  
I

iTrader: (6)
 
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Spanaway, WA
Posts: 3,755
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
well i dont want to flame.. but my goodness im speachless that intake is terrible! out of curiousity who designed that thing? did the person have any knowledge of intake manifold design?
Old 12-22-09, 04:09 PM
  #29  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by kompressorlogic
well i dont want to flame.. but my goodness im speachless that intake is terrible! out of curiousity who designed that thing? did the person have any knowledge of intake manifold design?
Obviously designed by somebody who is totally clueless, which is fairly common. However, it appears the person at least tried to somewhat copy what was seen in performance magazines, and it certainly shows motivation, so at least that is good.

Originally Posted by blackrotary23
it is exactly 100 hp less than from what i predicted. let me know what you think the problem might be.
Oh, I know what the problem is, but it would be too difficult for me to describe it without getting a warning from the moderators.
Old 12-22-09, 04:15 PM
  #30  
snap crackle brap

Thread Starter
 
blackrotary23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: indianapolis, indiana
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that was one of the first things that i tried to do. the manifold does not match up to the s4 block. on the s5 side manifold, they eliminate the center port at the bottom thus putting these two pieces together makes for fuel leakage resulting in numerous problems.
Old 12-22-09, 04:35 PM
  #31  
'89 GTUs

iTrader: (1)
 
Omixeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ditch the manifold on there now and get a functional S5 VDI intake on there. It will definitely make a difference.
Old 12-22-09, 04:47 PM
  #32  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
stevensimon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: salt lake ut
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by fc3s690
when I had my 90gxl I dynoed 180hp to the wheels. that was with a fresh rebuild, full rb exhaust and a drop in K&N filter. Oh yea I polished the intake runners too. It was still slow lol
dyno sheet?
Old 12-22-09, 06:45 PM
  #33  
Captain OCD

iTrader: (13)
 
SoloII///M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by blackrotary23
that was one of the first things that i tried to do. the manifold does not match up to the s4 block. on the s5 side manifold, they eliminate the center port at the bottom thus putting these two pieces together makes for fuel leakage resulting in numerous problems.
What on earth are you talking about?
Old 12-22-09, 06:48 PM
  #34  
Racer
iTrader: (4)
 
NI_Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fl
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to throw salt in any wounds or anything. I picked up an S4 NA that wouldnt idle. Fixed the vaccume issue, and took it to the dyno. The car was stock, gutted cats (no 5th/6th port) and a cone filter. Exhaust leaks and all the car dyno'd at 138 at the wheels with 123 torque. The graph clearly showed a drop of 6hp when the ports were posed to open. I am working on getting them back online and will let you know where its at with working ports and a cat delete pipe (minimal/no exhaust leaks). Hoping for close to 150.... but i doubt ill get it
Old 12-22-09, 08:17 PM
  #35  
Driving RX7's since 1979

iTrader: (43)
 
HOZZMANRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: So Cal where the OC/LA/SB counties meet
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Thumbs up Dyno Sheet for my S5 AutoVert with the following mods.

Stock engine
Apexi SAFCII
K&N Drop in Air Filter<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
RacingBeat manifold back exhaust<o:p></o:p>
RacingBeat Ultra Ignition Wires<o:p></o:p>


Graph indicates readings after initial SAFC adjustments and thebn final readings when the SAFC tuning was complete. The after - 138 horses and 110 torque made it past the TorquConverter and the rest of the drivetrane to the rear wheels.
Attached Thumbnails Horsepower 125.8????????? wtf??!!!-autovert-dynosheet.jpg  
Old 12-22-09, 08:23 PM
  #36  
'89 GTUs

iTrader: (1)
 
Omixeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hozzmans post contradicts the guy above him. I call BS on NI_Racing.
Old 12-22-09, 08:33 PM
  #37  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (5)
 
84stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: calgary
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
hmmm, dreaming on the hp thing..it would take a bridgeport and a big weber sidedraft to get to 225+. My compliments to the effort and paint though..
Old 12-22-09, 08:53 PM
  #38  
Driving RX7's since 1979

iTrader: (43)
 
HOZZMANRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: So Cal where the OC/LA/SB counties meet
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Thumbs up Further HP expectation reference

Careful comparing N1's numbers with my Autoverts as I would expect that the Automatic Tranny soaks up a lot more HP and Torque before it can get to the wheels than I would expect a manual tranny would.

I'll also mention that my S4 TurboVert with:

Full S4 TII drivetrane with stock engine block
S5 Turbo
Walbro Fuel Pump with dedicated power circuit
Racing Beat REV II Turbo back exhaust
Racing Beat Lighten Steel Flywheel and Street Strip Clutch
Racing Beat Ultra Ignition Wires
Racing Beat Oil Cap
K&N drop in Air Filter
Apexi Boost Controller

Tuned puts 199 hp and 196 Torque to the wheel. So I would agree your 225 hp expectation might have been a bit ambitious.
Attached Thumbnails Horsepower 125.8????????? wtf??!!!-mazdrat-dyno.jpg  
Old 12-22-09, 09:01 PM
  #39  
Listen to King Diamond.

iTrader: (4)
 
need RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 2,832
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 84stock
hmmm, dreaming on the hp thing..it would take a bridgeport and a big weber sidedraft to get to 225+. My compliments to the effort and paint though..
More like a street port and mad tuning skillz: https://www.rx7club.com/naturally-aspirated-performance-forum-220/make-230rwhp-streetport-13bre-n-818133/
Old 12-22-09, 09:49 PM
  #40  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
rosey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blackrotary23
PLEASE PUT DOWN THE DRUGS!

There is nothing wrong with the dyno, your car is incredibly slow.
Old 12-22-09, 09:54 PM
  #41  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
this is kahrens car ( old version )

he makes about 200 wheel hp with this setup. made some pretty good HP.
Old 12-23-09, 12:00 AM
  #42  
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
10yearrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: in my car
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my 10 AE I got 192hp to the wheels with only full racing beat exhaust and K&N drop in. I would love to push 250-300 though
Old 12-23-09, 12:13 AM
  #43  
dewey

 
katkaroto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 580
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you should have someone go dyno a stock FC vs your FC setup. i had a NA a while back. it probably had about 120 hp on it since emissions were all removed, the aux port were removed, and a custom fab single exhaust was put on. Also how are the gas on that car since you have the aux ports open. i remember my gas tank was sapped so fast when i had them open. about 1/4 gas gone in 30 miles... which wasnt suppose to happen.

well, either you shoot NOS, custom fab some ITBs and go stand alone, or go turbo fab. your numbers are right for your car.
Old 12-23-09, 03:10 AM
  #44  
I

iTrader: (6)
 
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Spanaway, WA
Posts: 3,755
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
this is kahrens car ( old version )

he makes about 200 wheel hp with this setup. made some pretty good HP.
stock port?
Old 12-23-09, 07:36 AM
  #45  
Old Rotary Dog

 
wrankin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by kompressorlogic
stock port?
Heh - good catch. From the kahren's other posts, that engine is most likely heavily street ported. That picture also looks a little odd - almost like a P-P setup. I can't see where the fuel goes in.
Old 12-23-09, 08:57 AM
  #46  
'89 GTUs

iTrader: (1)
 
Omixeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by need RX7
More like a street port and mad tuning skillz: https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=818133
Doesn't count. They're using a 13b-RE with custom porting. Whose ports are already infinity times bigger than the s4 stock ports to begin with.
Old 12-23-09, 09:04 AM
  #47  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by wrankin
Heh - good catch. From the kahren's other posts, that engine is most likely heavily street ported. That picture also looks a little odd - almost like a P-P setup. I can't see where the fuel goes in.
you can see the fuel rail.
Old 12-23-09, 09:10 AM
  #48  
Old Rotary Dog

 
wrankin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
you can see the fuel rail.
Well I see the bottoms of what look to be the primary injectors and looking closer I think I see the back end of the secondary rail. But it certainly isn't clear.

-b
Old 12-23-09, 09:59 AM
  #49  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by blackrotary23
that was one of the first things that i tried to do. the manifold does not match up to the s4 block. on the s5 side manifold, they eliminate the center port at the bottom thus putting these two pieces together makes for fuel leakage resulting in numerous problems.
I think I get what you are saying. The S5 irons don't have the EGR passages. But I don't know what it has to do with the issues you are having with your car...
Old 12-23-09, 10:25 AM
  #50  
Top Down, Boost Up

iTrader: (7)
 
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by blackrotary23
that was one of the first things that i tried to do. the manifold does not match up to the s4 block. on the s5 side manifold, they eliminate the center port at the bottom thus putting these two pieces together makes for fuel leakage resulting in numerous problems.
Searching helps: http://homepage.mac.com/carldavis/intake.html

S5 manifolds on S4 engines is nothing new, and it is certainly a lot easier than making a fabbed manifold work.


Quick Reply: Horsepower 125.8????????? wtf??!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.