2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Horsepower 125.8????????? wtf??!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 03:03 PM
  #26  
fc3s690's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Barnhart
when I had my 90gxl I dynoed 180hp to the wheels. that was with a fresh rebuild, full rb exhaust and a drop in K&N filter. Oh yea I polished the intake runners too. It was still slow lol
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 03:15 PM
  #27  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Without a standalone you won't be able to take advantage of that intake. Also those runners are insanely short and will probably start making power at 11K or so.

From the video it looks like you have the stock exhaust manifold? You'll never make any power with that thing.

An S-AFC won't be able to tune this very well. You need a standalone.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 03:43 PM
  #28  
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
I
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 12
From: Spanaway, WA
well i dont want to flame.. but my goodness im speachless that intake is terrible! out of curiousity who designed that thing? did the person have any knowledge of intake manifold design?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #29  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by kompressorlogic
well i dont want to flame.. but my goodness im speachless that intake is terrible! out of curiousity who designed that thing? did the person have any knowledge of intake manifold design?
Obviously designed by somebody who is totally clueless, which is fairly common. However, it appears the person at least tried to somewhat copy what was seen in performance magazines, and it certainly shows motivation, so at least that is good.

Originally Posted by blackrotary23
it is exactly 100 hp less than from what i predicted. let me know what you think the problem might be.
Oh, I know what the problem is, but it would be too difficult for me to describe it without getting a warning from the moderators.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 04:15 PM
  #30  
blackrotary23's Avatar
Thread Starter
snap crackle brap
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: indianapolis, indiana
that was one of the first things that i tried to do. the manifold does not match up to the s4 block. on the s5 side manifold, they eliminate the center port at the bottom thus putting these two pieces together makes for fuel leakage resulting in numerous problems.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #31  
Omixeo's Avatar
'89 GTUs
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Arizona
Ditch the manifold on there now and get a functional S5 VDI intake on there. It will definitely make a difference.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 04:47 PM
  #32  
stevensimon's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
Originally Posted by fc3s690
when I had my 90gxl I dynoed 180hp to the wheels. that was with a fresh rebuild, full rb exhaust and a drop in K&N filter. Oh yea I polished the intake runners too. It was still slow lol
dyno sheet?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 06:45 PM
  #33  
SoloII///M's Avatar
Captain OCD
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 863
Likes: 2
From: Glenwood, MD
Originally Posted by blackrotary23
that was one of the first things that i tried to do. the manifold does not match up to the s4 block. on the s5 side manifold, they eliminate the center port at the bottom thus putting these two pieces together makes for fuel leakage resulting in numerous problems.
What on earth are you talking about?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 06:48 PM
  #34  
NI_Racing's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Fl
Not to throw salt in any wounds or anything. I picked up an S4 NA that wouldnt idle. Fixed the vaccume issue, and took it to the dyno. The car was stock, gutted cats (no 5th/6th port) and a cone filter. Exhaust leaks and all the car dyno'd at 138 at the wheels with 123 torque. The graph clearly showed a drop of 6hp when the ports were posed to open. I am working on getting them back online and will let you know where its at with working ports and a cat delete pipe (minimal/no exhaust leaks). Hoping for close to 150.... but i doubt ill get it
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #35  
HOZZMANRX7's Avatar
Driving RX7's since 1979
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 9
From: So Cal where the OC/LA/SB counties meet
Thumbs up Dyno Sheet for my S5 AutoVert with the following mods.

Stock engine
Apexi SAFCII
K&N Drop in Air Filter<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
RacingBeat manifold back exhaust<o:p></o:p>
RacingBeat Ultra Ignition Wires<o:p></o:p>


Graph indicates readings after initial SAFC adjustments and thebn final readings when the SAFC tuning was complete. The after - 138 horses and 110 torque made it past the TorquConverter and the rest of the drivetrane to the rear wheels.
Attached Thumbnails Horsepower 125.8????????? wtf??!!!-autovert-dynosheet.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #36  
Omixeo's Avatar
'89 GTUs
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Arizona
Hozzmans post contradicts the guy above him. I call BS on NI_Racing.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 08:33 PM
  #37  
84stock's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
hmmm, dreaming on the hp thing..it would take a bridgeport and a big weber sidedraft to get to 225+. My compliments to the effort and paint though..
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 08:53 PM
  #38  
HOZZMANRX7's Avatar
Driving RX7's since 1979
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 9
From: So Cal where the OC/LA/SB counties meet
Thumbs up Further HP expectation reference

Careful comparing N1's numbers with my Autoverts as I would expect that the Automatic Tranny soaks up a lot more HP and Torque before it can get to the wheels than I would expect a manual tranny would.

I'll also mention that my S4 TurboVert with:

Full S4 TII drivetrane with stock engine block
S5 Turbo
Walbro Fuel Pump with dedicated power circuit
Racing Beat REV II Turbo back exhaust
Racing Beat Lighten Steel Flywheel and Street Strip Clutch
Racing Beat Ultra Ignition Wires
Racing Beat Oil Cap
K&N drop in Air Filter
Apexi Boost Controller

Tuned puts 199 hp and 196 Torque to the wheel. So I would agree your 225 hp expectation might have been a bit ambitious.
Attached Thumbnails Horsepower 125.8????????? wtf??!!!-mazdrat-dyno.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 09:01 PM
  #39  
need RX7's Avatar
Listen to King Diamond.
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 13
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by 84stock
hmmm, dreaming on the hp thing..it would take a bridgeport and a big weber sidedraft to get to 225+. My compliments to the effort and paint though..
More like a street port and mad tuning skillz: https://www.rx7club.com/naturally-aspirated-performance-forum-220/make-230rwhp-streetport-13bre-n-818133/
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 09:49 PM
  #40  
rosey's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by blackrotary23
PLEASE PUT DOWN THE DRUGS!

There is nothing wrong with the dyno, your car is incredibly slow.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 09:54 PM
  #41  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
this is kahrens car ( old version )

he makes about 200 wheel hp with this setup. made some pretty good HP.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 12:00 AM
  #42  
10yearrx7's Avatar
313 whp 247 wtq 8D
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: in my car
In my 10 AE I got 192hp to the wheels with only full racing beat exhaust and K&N drop in. I would love to push 250-300 though
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 12:13 AM
  #43  
katkaroto's Avatar
dewey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 580
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
you should have someone go dyno a stock FC vs your FC setup. i had a NA a while back. it probably had about 120 hp on it since emissions were all removed, the aux port were removed, and a custom fab single exhaust was put on. Also how are the gas on that car since you have the aux ports open. i remember my gas tank was sapped so fast when i had them open. about 1/4 gas gone in 30 miles... which wasnt suppose to happen.

well, either you shoot NOS, custom fab some ITBs and go stand alone, or go turbo fab. your numbers are right for your car.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 03:10 AM
  #44  
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
I
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 12
From: Spanaway, WA
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
this is kahrens car ( old version )

he makes about 200 wheel hp with this setup. made some pretty good HP.
stock port?
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 07:36 AM
  #45  
wrankin's Avatar
Old Rotary Dog
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 2
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by kompressorlogic
stock port?
Heh - good catch. From the kahren's other posts, that engine is most likely heavily street ported. That picture also looks a little odd - almost like a P-P setup. I can't see where the fuel goes in.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 08:57 AM
  #46  
Omixeo's Avatar
'89 GTUs
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Arizona
Originally Posted by need RX7
More like a street port and mad tuning skillz: https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=818133
Doesn't count. They're using a 13b-RE with custom porting. Whose ports are already infinity times bigger than the s4 stock ports to begin with.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 09:04 AM
  #47  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
Originally Posted by wrankin
Heh - good catch. From the kahren's other posts, that engine is most likely heavily street ported. That picture also looks a little odd - almost like a P-P setup. I can't see where the fuel goes in.
you can see the fuel rail.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 09:10 AM
  #48  
wrankin's Avatar
Old Rotary Dog
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 2
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
you can see the fuel rail.
Well I see the bottoms of what look to be the primary injectors and looking closer I think I see the back end of the secondary rail. But it certainly isn't clear.

-b
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #49  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by blackrotary23
that was one of the first things that i tried to do. the manifold does not match up to the s4 block. on the s5 side manifold, they eliminate the center port at the bottom thus putting these two pieces together makes for fuel leakage resulting in numerous problems.
I think I get what you are saying. The S5 irons don't have the EGR passages. But I don't know what it has to do with the issues you are having with your car...
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #50  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by blackrotary23
that was one of the first things that i tried to do. the manifold does not match up to the s4 block. on the s5 side manifold, they eliminate the center port at the bottom thus putting these two pieces together makes for fuel leakage resulting in numerous problems.
Searching helps: http://homepage.mac.com/carldavis/intake.html

S5 manifolds on S4 engines is nothing new, and it is certainly a lot easier than making a fabbed manifold work.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.