2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

HKS Blow-Off Valve vs HKS Bypass Valve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 08:07 AM
  #1  
Unreal PR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Kureiji Gaijin
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: 日本
HKS Blow-Off Valve vs HKS Bypass Valve

I got one of each sitting in front of me waiting to be put in my FC. I've searched a lot of atmospheric vs recirculating threads. Most of it is preference. However, I notice some people say a recirculating bypass valve has more benefits as far as "precharging" the turbo.

My question is: Hypothetically, if you had a fairly stock FC with a bad stock bypass valve. And you already had both of these sitting in front of you. Which would you put in, and why? Also, are there proven benefits for either?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 09:43 PM
  #2  
walken's Avatar
Registered Loser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
From: Whiterock
the aftermarket for the sound. recirculate it to not run rich between shifts.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 10:34 PM
  #3  
Unreal PR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Kureiji Gaijin
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: 日本
They're both aftermarket. I know you meant the atmos bov, though. Everywhere I read people say recirc is better, but everyone wants the sound.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotafuzz
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Sep 30, 2015 09:55 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 PM.