2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Fuel system upgrade with bridge port?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 02:36 PM
  #1  
Jonlisle81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Fuel system upgrade with bridge port?

Alright everyone...I blew my motor in my 89 N/A. Now it's time to rebuild and I'm going to have a j bridge porting done. I was just wondering if I am going to require some fuel system modifications to accomodate this new engine mod.
My current mods I have an Apexi filter and true duel exhaust w/racing beat mufflers( http://www.mazdatrix.com/r-ex86nt.htm ). This is my daily driver. Since I blew one of my apex seals and God knows what else, I'm force to rebuild the motor asap so it doesn't rust to death. My funds are limited but I am going to be buying new plugs, wires, and a pulley, in addition to the rebuild.
What I need to know is if I will NEED to upgrade my fuel system due to the bridge porting? I have no type of aftermarket engine management and hope that the port won't require one to run safely. I will be saving up for engine management in the near future, but I was hoping that I wouldn't need some sort of piggyback until then. Will I need an afc? Or could I just temporarily have a shop add more fuel through the new pump and regulator.
Any info you all could give me will be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jon.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #2  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Stock ECU cannot handle a BP.
A piggyback isn't going to help either.
Go carbs or aftermarket EMS.


-Ted
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 10:42 PM
  #3  
drago86's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
Originally Posted by RETed
Stock ECU cannot handle a BP.
A piggyback isn't going to help either.
Go carbs or aftermarket EMS.


-Ted
Ito's done it,.. i'm doing with a aux bridge,.. they only problem ive run into is the stock s4 rev limiter at 7800,.. but he wont have that problem. I agree that a standalone will make more power but he'll be able to drive it untill then fine.

To answer the question,.. the stock stuff is good for around 230-40 flywheel hp, maybe a lil less with the rich stock maps. wether or not you will need fuel upgrades will depend on how much power you make. If you do run out of fuel you will need to get a bigger fuel pump and larger injectors both because the NA fuel pump/ injectors run out at about the same point. Youll then need a s-afc atleast to control it. Stand alone or carb with a non stock manifold is the best way to go, but you can get running fine with the stock stuff.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #4  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by drago86
Ito's done it,.. i'm doing with a aux bridge,.. they only problem ive run into is the stock s4 rev limiter at 7800,.. but he wont have that problem. I agree that a standalone will make more power but he'll be able to drive it untill then fine.

To answer the question,.. the stock stuff is good for around 230-40 flywheel hp, maybe a lil less with the rich stock maps. wether or not you will need fuel upgrades will depend on how much power you make. If you do run out of fuel you will need to get a bigger fuel pump and larger injectors both because the NA fuel pump/ injectors run out at about the same point. Youll then need a s-afc atleast to control it. Stand alone or carb with a non stock manifold is the best way to go, but you can get running fine with the stock stuff.
What was done to it?
Do you have a link to the details?
You read "J bridge" that the original poster was asking for, right?


-Ted
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 11:15 PM
  #5  
razorback's Avatar
You've Been Punk'd
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 1
From: Branson, Missouri
my car was running a half bridge using stock ecu and 800cc secondaries and a hks safr (it really messed up after i put in the safc2) its possible. would i reccomend it? NO
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 11:59 PM
  #6  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by razorback
my car was running a half bridge using stock ecu and 800cc secondaries and a hks safr (it really messed up after i put in the safc2) its possible.
"half bridge" = J bridge?


-Ted
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 12:13 AM
  #7  
razorback's Avatar
You've Been Punk'd
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 1
From: Branson, Missouri
i that a question? or are you being a smartass? (hard to tell sometimes )
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 12:54 AM
  #8  
Corbit's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Fidalgo Island,Wa
Razorback how did you tune your AFR for your half bridge , on a dyno ?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 01:01 AM
  #9  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by razorback
i that a question? or are you being a smartass? (hard to tell sometimes )
Yes, I'm asking you the question if they are equivalent and / or what is the difference between the two?


-Ted
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 01:03 AM
  #10  
razorback's Avatar
You've Been Punk'd
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 1
From: Branson, Missouri
Originally Posted by Corbit
Razorback how did you tune your AFR for your half bridge , on a dyno ?
it was already tuned when i got the car, very rich i might add. and i would definately suggest that you dyno tune it (sorry for not responding to your pm)
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 01:04 AM
  #11  
razorback's Avatar
You've Been Punk'd
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 1
From: Branson, Missouri
Originally Posted by RETed
Yes, I'm asking you the question if they are equivalent and / or what is the difference between the two?


-Ted
half bridge is secondaries ported and i believe the jbridge is ported the end/mid plates and also some of the rotor housings are ported? i just know its a bigger port.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 01:26 AM
  #12  
Crusader_9x's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
from what i knwo and have heard a j port is a hell of alot bigger than your standard half bridge. while i think you could get by on the stock computer with a half bridge i wouldnt want to try on what i know to be a j port/bridge.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 01:31 AM
  #13  
razorback's Avatar
You've Been Punk'd
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,727
Likes: 1
From: Branson, Missouri
the j bridge also extends into the water jacket, thought so wanted to make sure.

http://www.mazdarotary.net/porting.htm
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 02:01 PM
  #14  
Jonlisle81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Well it looks like it's going to have to be either and extended port or just a bridge port. Didn't know the J bridge was synonomous with monstor port. I used this as my guide for porting. http://me.a-spec.ca:6001/Rotary/Porting.html
Thanks for the info guys.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 02:15 PM
  #15  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
ITO did it to an S4; i'm still waiting for results on a stock ecu bridge/half bridge on an S5.
as far as i know, its still pretty much experimental territory (i still dont know if its been done). i searched and asked and didn't find anyone who had done it. both of ITO's bridgeports on stock ecus were S4, though.
if you really want the bridges, i would advise the standalone in the near future. if you do in fact get the bridges done and run it on the stock ecu, post your results. no one else seems to either do this mod or if so, no one seems to talk about it (that i've found).
and i hope you dont have to pass emissions.

my engine/car sat for 7 months dead; no rust. i wouldnt be too hasty on the "asap" decision.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 03:49 PM
  #16  
Kim's Avatar
Kim
OBEY YOUR MAZDA
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,060
Likes: 2
From: Denmark
Im going for a bridged 6 port on stock ecu with 550 injectors, SAFC, MSD, distributor(eurocar).
Most likely custom intake.

www.wankelkim.net/motor.JPG
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 04:16 PM
  #17  
drago86's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
Ito's cars were full bridges, theres a video floating around of one of them racing a t2...
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #18  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Kim, that's beautiful. i think i've read about you doing it before. you may be one of the people i was referring to hearing about it, but never seeing results. good luck with it.
i dont know squat about the euro versions, though i did know you got the distributors. the thing is both the bridged cars Ito ran were S4s. i dont know how well they ran, but i believe he was pleased. i tried finding differences between the S4s and S5s that could give me problems, but all i remember is the AFM. supposedly, and i dont know this for sure, the S4s have a broader range AFM than the S5s. this could be a myth for all i know. moreso, i couldnt pass emissions with the bridges. hell, i havent passed with the streetport (sensor troubles).
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 06:29 PM
  #19  
Kim's Avatar
Kim
OBEY YOUR MAZDA
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,060
Likes: 2
From: Denmark
In DK my 86 GLX will pass without any emissions at all, as long as the CO is below 4,5
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
82streetracer
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Aug 23, 2015 09:28 AM
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Aug 14, 2015 10:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 PM.