Fuel cut decel will premixing
#1
Fuel cut decel will premixing
So I totally forgot about the not getting premix will fuel is cut for some reason. I have a half-bridged tii motor with n/a rotors for alittle while and always found it easier to drive city wise with the fuel cut on real low like 1700 rpms and just let it coast without fuel instead of it bucking with the amount of gas it uses. It might just be the tune though. Has there been any kind of proof of oil starvation this way or since its not combusting, does the oil stay coated ok?
#3
well if you decel it'll be fine the injectors are still on spray, now unless you have a fcd then your going to start having compression prob after a while on the rear housing i believe
#4
I'm running a haltech e6k. But the fuel cut decel feature is on real low so it doesn't buck so much, but then I realized that premix doesn't get sprayed since there is 0 duty cycle though. I've seen a bunch of threads but they basically have no answer, just a bunch of people arguing and then it gets closed. Some say since no combustion happens its okay, while others say the oil gets scraped off easily. This is basically the only thing I found on the topic and seems pretty good.
SyonykYou'll be fine. Premix does leave a protective film behind, and the engine under fuel cut deceleration is experiencing basically no significant loads - there's no combustion forcing the apex seals out, so it's spring & centripital forces.
The whole point of premix is to leave a lubricating film behind - that's how it works. I have a S4 NA, 20k miles on a rebuilt engine with fuel cut intact & running premix the entire life of the engine. I engine brake quite a bit, and I've never worried about it at all.
Don't worry about it. The early rotary engines didn't have anything for seal lubrication, and they were able to run fine.
-=Russ=-
SyonykYou'll be fine. Premix does leave a protective film behind, and the engine under fuel cut deceleration is experiencing basically no significant loads - there's no combustion forcing the apex seals out, so it's spring & centripital forces.
The whole point of premix is to leave a lubricating film behind - that's how it works. I have a S4 NA, 20k miles on a rebuilt engine with fuel cut intact & running premix the entire life of the engine. I engine brake quite a bit, and I've never worried about it at all.
Don't worry about it. The early rotary engines didn't have anything for seal lubrication, and they were able to run fine.
-=Russ=-
#5
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
iTrader: (3)
First, having the fuel cut really low should be making cruising speeds difficult since it will cut fuel during any decrease in RPM that is ABOVE the inputted number. With 1700 in that field, when you are driving at any RPM above 1700 and the haltech sees a decrease in RPM - it cuts fuel.
Your description and experience are bass-ackwards.
As far as the question goes, I can't see it hurting that much. I ran my car like that with no troubles. There's many ways to think about it but really, whats going to happen when there's no (or very minimal) lube at the seal/housing surface? Wear, yes?
How many engines get rebuilt because the seal simply wore out? Not many. There's usually 1700 other causes by the time it reaches that point. Sure, the majority may be "wear" in essence since that what causes low compression but I dunno - thats my story and I'm stickin' to it
For me, the 2 fold increase in fuel mileage means I can afford to rebuild that much sooner
Your description and experience are bass-ackwards.
As far as the question goes, I can't see it hurting that much. I ran my car like that with no troubles. There's many ways to think about it but really, whats going to happen when there's no (or very minimal) lube at the seal/housing surface? Wear, yes?
How many engines get rebuilt because the seal simply wore out? Not many. There's usually 1700 other causes by the time it reaches that point. Sure, the majority may be "wear" in essence since that what causes low compression but I dunno - thats my story and I'm stickin' to it
For me, the 2 fold increase in fuel mileage means I can afford to rebuild that much sooner
#6
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
always found it easier to drive city wise with the fuel cut on real low like 1700 rpms and just let it coast without fuel instead of it bucking with the amount of gas it uses
The fuel gets turned back on at around 1100-1200 rpm which is where it may get a little jumpy.
well if you decel it'll be fine the injectors are still on spray, now unless you have a fcd then your going to start having compression prob after a while on the rear housing i believe
Premix does leave a protective film behind, and the engine under fuel cut deceleration is experiencing basically no significant loads - there's no combustion forcing the apex seals out, so it's spring & centripital forces.
Don't worry about it. The early rotary engines didn't have anything for seal lubrication, and they were able to run fine.
Trending Topics
#8
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
So I totally forgot about the not getting premix will fuel is cut for some reason. I have a half-bridged tii motor with n/a rotors for alittle while and always found it easier to drive city wise with the fuel cut on real low like 1700 rpms and just let it coast without fuel instead of it bucking with the amount of gas it uses. It might just be the tune though. Has there been any kind of proof of oil starvation this way or since its not combusting, does the oil stay coated ok?
Based on the fact that no one has had an engine failure related to oil starvation on decel I doubt it's a big issue. I just brought it up as a point in the last thread because those who always support premix like to nitpick every minor point as well.
For the record I think for lubrication premix does a fine job. Obviously it works. Does it work better then the stock system? In my opinion no because in order for something to work better it must be superior in all aspects. It's a royal pain to premix, while the stock system requires virtually no attention.
EFI systems cut all fuel during decel when the TPS is at zero. Otherwise you firehose unburned fuel from the exhaust, cause the engine to buck and contaminate the oil. All aftermarket EFI systems have the option to enable or disable decel cut but I can't think of any possible reason you would want to disable it. Maybe in a high overlap port in a racing situation to smooth out the throttle transition.
An FCD is simply a voltage clamp and prevents the ECU from seeing the real boost the pressure sensor is measuring past a certain point (8 PSI or so). This eliminates the ECU's fuel cut.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
21
09-01-15 06:32 PM
armans
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
08-15-15 09:08 PM