2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Fluid Dynamics/ Portmatching

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-03, 12:48 AM
  #1  
We come with the Hardcore

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fluid Dynamics/ Portmatching

Simple Q, simple A. Which of these 3 runners (just 2 lengths of pipe joined at the flange... think of them like manifolds, or exhaust pipe) would flow the best (note, air flows to the right)?



Feel free to be as discriptive as you want, but multiple simple answers will do.
Old 07-29-03, 01:01 AM
  #2  
Where's My Fuel???

 
vectorminds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
id say the last one, as there is no change at all in the pipe, assuming there is no lip there, and it is nice and smooth between the two pipes
Old 07-29-03, 01:06 AM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Rx-7Blazin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
id say 2 because i dont think any exhaust is going to exacly match up (#3)there will be overlap. 2 would have like no overlap and its angled not sharp. And #1 has a sharp drop off which would mess with the airflow.

Last edited by Rx-7Blazin; 07-29-03 at 01:09 AM.
Old 07-29-03, 01:37 AM
  #4  
putting it down daily

 
introVert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All things being equal (which they rarely are) I would say # 3, no turbulence created by opening up or closing down.
Old 07-29-03, 01:49 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
AJatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Far right is the best. The runner is smooth and uninterrupted assuming all else around it is ideal (smooth flat level flange surface and perfect alignment).

If you want to use materials, you could also use mild steel mandrel bent j-bends and u-bends. These bends have one end that is the smaller to serve as sleeves for connecting bends and welding it. It's great for DIY projects.

J
Old 07-29-03, 06:29 AM
  #6  
trying to build a racecar

 
Travis R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austin, Tx.
Posts: 580
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is this a trick question?
I've actually read a book that says #1 is more desireable. But it was mainly dealing with piston engines. Intake and exhaust ports with mismatched openings, like in #1, are for anti-reversion, keeping the airflow from changing direction. The shape was a little different though. Cut a radius into that flat face and it would do a better job.
I would think that flow reversion is less of a problem with a rotary since the time that the intake/exhaust runner is completely closed to air coming in/out of the engine is very small compared to a 4 stroke piston engine with valves.
Did I get it right? What do I win? :p
Old 07-29-03, 09:38 AM
  #7  
top row 2nd from left..me

 
Rotary?Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
#1 is not better than #3, but #3 looks impossible. #2 will cause a lot of turbulance.
Old 07-29-03, 10:28 AM
  #8  
88 AE

 
BDoty311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
number 2
Old 07-29-03, 02:16 PM
  #9  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Too vague of a question...

Is this intake or exhaust?&nbsp Cooler intake charges behave slightly differently than hot, expanding exhaust gases...

Is this for NA or forced induction?&nbsp Turbulence affects NA applications more than forced induction applications...

In general, you want less turbulence.


-Ted
Old 07-29-03, 03:16 PM
  #10  
We come with the Hardcore

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More N/A intake than anything else.
Old 07-29-03, 06:12 PM
  #11  
Displacement > Boost

 
88IntegraLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since intake charges go both directions after the surge tank in NA engines, # 3 would probably perform best as it gives no possibility to create any drag, other than parasite drag of the air past the inside walls of the runner. Even with exhaust there are reversing pressure waves that can be tuned so I would not see any advantage to # 1 or 2 unless a restrictive exhaust was used, where gas reversion would be very bad for exhaust port temps.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
10-07-15 08:12 PM
James Knox
New Member RX-7 Technical
9
10-05-15 07:56 AM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-04-15 06:17 PM



Quick Reply: Fluid Dynamics/ Portmatching



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 PM.