2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

FD twins on a FC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-03, 01:05 PM
  #1  
John Deere Drifter

Thread Starter
 
driftaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: "Drifting has a rice filter, its called Skill."
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb FD twins on a FC

I've seen aftermarket FD setups made to work on the FC with a spacer, what would I need to put some FD twins on my FC?
Old 12-06-03, 01:52 PM
  #2  
truespin, not tirespin

 
truespin88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Belpre, Ohio
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is generally understood that you don't want twin turbo if you can run a comparable single. Singles are cheaper... just like single exhaust vs. duals.
Old 12-06-03, 02:10 PM
  #3  
John Deere Drifter

Thread Starter
 
driftaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: "Drifting has a rice filter, its called Skill."
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want a good quick spooling setup with good top end and I know that fd twins are a decent setup for that. beside I can get a set cheap.
Old 12-06-03, 02:15 PM
  #4  
mad scientist

 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
search!!!!!

to make a long story short, no matter how cheap you get the turbos, its not worth it. Theyre not good enough to justify all the work necessary to make them work.
Old 12-06-03, 02:17 PM
  #5  
John Deere Drifter

Thread Starter
 
driftaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: "Drifting has a rice filter, its called Skill."
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did a search to no avail.

Anything has to be better then a stock s4 POS
Old 12-06-03, 02:20 PM
  #6  
Older than Dirt

 
Mr. Gadget's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adam is right on both accounts. I found everything searching, you too can do the same...

Its just not worth the hassle. You have to ask your self why many FD guys to a double to a single mod anyway.......
Old 12-06-03, 05:20 PM
  #7  
mad scientist

 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There needs to be a mandatory course in proper use of the search function prior to being allowed to post here. Use a little common sense when searching, and you have the knowledge of this whole forum only a few keystrokes away.
Old 12-06-03, 05:48 PM
  #8  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by mazdaspeed7
to make a long story short, no matter how cheap you get the turbos, its not worth it. Theyre not good enough to justify all the work necessary to make them work.
I don't agree. The fact that the FD makes ~28% more power than the S5 with only 1.5psi more boost means they obviously have a lot more flow potential. If you can score them cheap and have the skills to do the plumbing yourself (not that big a deal) then you'd have a resonably substantial upgrade over stock.

This is not be a project for an amateur, nor would it be worth sinking a bunch of money into, but under the right circumstances it would be ideal for someone interested in the more useable power a pair of small twins offer compared to a big single. Not everyone here is shooting for 400hp.

Last edited by NZConvertible; 12-06-03 at 05:50 PM.
Old 12-06-03, 06:09 PM
  #9  
mad scientist

 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by NZConvertible
I don't agree. The fact that the FD makes ~28% more power than the S5 with only 1.5psi more boost means they obviously have a lot more flow potential. If you can score them cheap and have the skills to do the plumbing yourself (not that big a deal) then you'd have a resonably substantial upgrade over stock.

This is not be a project for an amateur, nor would it be worth sinking a bunch of money into, but under the right circumstances it would be ideal for someone interested in the more useable power a pair of small twins offer compared to a big single. Not everyone here is shooting for 400hp.
But when you get to that level of fabrication, there are other turbos that can be had used that would make more power for the same, if not less work.
Old 12-06-03, 07:53 PM
  #10  
RIP Icemark

iTrader: (4)
 
j200pruf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aloha OR
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't the FD also have a bunch of improvements like its intake manifold and porting that would add some power as well?
Old 12-06-03, 08:43 PM
  #11  
Older than Dirt

 
Mr. Gadget's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes they did, the project can be done, the return (HP/$) will suck. Many more mods that will yield a higher HP/$ return.
Old 12-06-03, 10:28 PM
  #12  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Name them.
Old 12-06-03, 10:43 PM
  #13  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
IwannaFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Novi Michigan
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lolol hey driftaholic i love your sig banner!! the gaijin part. yea anyways, bigger turbo usually = more lag but higher end power. twin setup=less lag but once you want more power when your running ur turbos at there limit, its gonna cost you to get 2 larger turbo + youll prolly want to go back to the single turbo setup with a bigger turbo and then all the money you put into the twin setup would be lost. you could just do a t4 hybrid?? my .02 cents -alex
Old 12-07-03, 12:12 AM
  #14  
The Dude Abides

 
neevosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You wouldn't be able to run them sequentially without a lot of work, if at all. Non-sequential, my FD was making about 300RWHP at 12psi, with full boost around 4000 RPM. That was with the cat still on there.

I don't think it's worth it. You'd have to make an adapter to bolt on the manifold, custom DP, oil lines, coolant lines, IC piping, intake. PLus, they put out a lot of heat.
Old 12-07-03, 12:58 PM
  #15  
Currently Winning

 
$150FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have talked to bryan (BNR) about putting the FD Stage 3 twins on my car. if the setup wasn't $2k+ i may have gone with it. it's doable, imhmfo.
Old 12-08-03, 09:24 AM
  #16  
John Deere Drifter

Thread Starter
 
driftaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: "Drifting has a rice filter, its called Skill."
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard about the 70+ vac lines that operate the seq. I would have to run them as twins instead. I can get a fd setup cheap. I think I am gonna do it just to do it, for the sake of saying it can be done and what the benifits are.
Old 12-08-03, 11:28 AM
  #17  
Junior Member

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stay single
Old 12-08-03, 11:58 AM
  #18  
Registered Loser

iTrader: (6)
 
walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Whiterock
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only reason I could see doing this, is to save money on a waste gate, I've thought about it, just can't get it to work out better than going single, and you can do all that for about 4 grand, if you've pushed the turbo you have as far as you can go.
Old 12-08-03, 12:20 PM
  #19  
Registered Loser

iTrader: (6)
 
walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Whiterock
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is what you need!

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...on%2Fb45798333
Old 12-08-03, 12:34 PM
  #20  
Registered Loser

iTrader: (6)
 
walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Whiterock
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or one with everything

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...on%2Fe33141383
Old 12-08-03, 12:38 PM
  #21  
root

 
zyounker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See, i have been looking at doing this too..


Do you even need a spacer? i would think you could just grind off the bottom of the manifold where it would hit the dowls on the S4-S5 motors?

Then take out the flaper doors and weld the holes shut.


It will act like a single turbo but is cheap.


the stock twins have made 400rwhp at the very limit. So 350RWHP is pretty easy to come by.


The other option you should look at is just an upgraded compressor on the HT18 stock turbo. This could get you ~350rwhp and still be cheap without the need to make the IC piping. (but you are still gonna need to upgrade the IC.
Old 12-08-03, 02:05 PM
  #22  
John Deere Drifter

Thread Starter
 
driftaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: "Drifting has a rice filter, its called Skill."
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but the wastegate is better on the FD
Old 12-08-03, 02:45 PM
  #23  
Senior Member

 
ludeowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Somewhere in California
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by driftaholic
I want a good quick spooling setup with good top end and I know that fd twins are a decent setup for that. beside I can get a set cheap.
Just from reading that I'm guessing that you want to run the FD twins in sequential mode. Like somebody already mentioned you'd have to do a lot of work to get it running in sequential mode.

So to make it easier on yourself you could run it in non-sequential (NS) mode. But you'd probably be doing the swap blind since not to many people (maybe no one at all) have done the swap.

Unfortunately, by going doing the NS conversion, you dont have the quick-spool that you were looking for.
Old 12-08-03, 02:56 PM
  #24  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by ludeowner
Just from reading that I'm guessing that you want to run the FD twins in sequential mode.
He's already said he isn't.
But you'd probably be doing the swap blind since not to many people (maybe no one at all) have done the swap.
Why do you think this would be any more difficult than any other turbo swap? Once you have them mounted, everything else connects up the same, just twice over.
Unfortunately, by going doing the NS conversion, you dont have the quick-spool that you were looking for.
Yes you do. Two small turbos will always spool faster than a single turbo with equivalent flow. Sequential is better again, but everyone here seems well aware that this isn't possible without the factory ECU.
Old 12-08-03, 03:02 PM
  #25  
Tenseiga

iTrader: (1)
 
Sesshoumaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how do you control the turbo pre-spoo and the turbo transitionl?

What i'm saying is there are things that are computer controlled (rpm based).

I'm interested how they got the twins to work in sequential mode on a 13b.

Running non-sequential is a LOT easier.


Quick Reply: FD twins on a FC



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.