2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

FC not a true sports car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2002 | 04:02 PM
  #1  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
FC not a true sports car?

What do you guys think about this? IMO the FC handles awesome, great power, and looks pretty good. What is it lacking?? Rotaryknight keeps preaching this to everyone at zilvia.net and I think its BS.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 04:45 PM
  #2  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
I have no idea what you are trying to say. Try again, please.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:00 PM
  #3  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
This is a pointless discussion really. What is a true sports car? Everyone has their own definition, nobody ever agrees and it all comes down to opinion. RX-7 owners are an excitable bunch and will leap to the defence of their car, so you can hardly expect to get an unbiased opinion here! Who cares what some mug on another board thinks of the RX-7? If you enjoy yours, that’s all that matters!
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:10 PM
  #4  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
Yea thats true, but this guys so f***ing arrogant its amazing. Sorry I didnt explain too well. I meant that he mentioned it wasn't really a true sports car which I disagree with.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:15 PM
  #5  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,880
Likes: 577
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
The FC is a GT, not a sports car.

Look at it this way - what is it more comparable to, a 928, or an MGB?
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:41 PM
  #6  
PraxRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
hmmm...

From a magazine point of view, the RX-7 was an affordable sports car, a cheap porchse when it first came out.

But it evolved to the FC which was still a great car performance and handling but for less price than another car that handles the same...

However, the TRUE sports car was the 3rd Gen RX-7 which cost a heck of a lot and was worked on insanely for lightening and to make it look new and awesome.

From a magazine point of view the 3rd gen is a true sports car.

However, I believe my FC is just as nice as any 3rd gen and just as TRUE! (Although some day I will have a 3rd gen and I will be able to get many womens with it).

19 yrs old, driving an '89 Turbo II...LOVING it.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:58 PM
  #7  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by peejay
The FC is a GT, not a sports car.
Dunno about that. The idea of a Grand Touring car is being able to travel long distances at high speed in comfort and quiet. Think Jag XK8, Ferrari 550, BMW 850 and like you said, the Porsche 928. I think the RX-7 is much closer to sports car than GT car.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:58 PM
  #8  
MtnRacer's Avatar
infini guru
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
We've done this topic before. Recently too. If you call a 944 a sports car, then an FC shouldn't be a problem. Search the for poll on this subject, TONS of opinions.

Steve
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 06:17 PM
  #9  
RX-7 GT's Avatar
HyperREV.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
i think its time to head over to zilvia.net and start ****
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 06:17 PM
  #10  
fastrotaries's Avatar
W. TX chirpin Monkey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
An old man once said to me that a TRUE sports car, has only two seats, well balanced chasis, and doesn't come with a roof. I said wow, whoever paid a million for a Mclaren got ripped off, because that sucker has a roof.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 06:21 PM
  #11  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
Originally posted by RX-7 GT
i think its time to head over to zilvia.net and start ****
haha have fun dealing with rotaryknight
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 06:53 PM
  #12  
rxseven's Avatar
Special Dark
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Well, since it is a 2 seater capable of 130+mph I say it is. The problem people in the US seem to have with it is the lack of acceleration from a standstill. Everything to do with performance here hinges on the 1/4 mile. Why else would the fascination for a mustang persist? Unfortunately, even the renesis falls short on the torque rating.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 07:02 PM
  #13  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,880
Likes: 577
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Dunno about that. The idea of a Grand Touring car is being able to travel long distances at high speed in comfort and quiet. Think Jag XK8, Ferrari 550, BMW 850 and like you said, the Porsche 928. I think the RX-7 is much closer to sports car than GT car.
I'm just looking at what I see. The FC is not very light, it has pretty much automatic/power everything, and it's rather big and can hold two people (and their luggage) in pretty good comfort.

That adds up to GT in my book The FC is about 400kg too heavy to really be a sports car, and it's just too big externally.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 07:04 PM
  #14  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,880
Likes: 577
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally posted by fastrotaries
An old man once said to me that a TRUE sports car, has only two seats, well balanced chasis, and doesn't come with a roof. I said wow, whoever paid a million for a Mclaren got ripped off, because that sucker has a roof.
The McLaren is nowhere NEAR a sports car. You'd have to cut the price by 99% and power by about 90%. And get rid of the top too
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 07:07 PM
  #15  
telus.net's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: B.C.
you can say an ae86 isn't a sports car, but an FC is a true Sports car! It's an RX-7, period.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 10:18 PM
  #16  
Scott 89t2's Avatar
SOLD THE RX-7!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
well acording to my insurance prices I think it's a super sports car LOL
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 10:24 PM
  #17  
Xentrix's Avatar
Kill Bear
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC
True, so true
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 10:45 PM
  #18  
jspecracer7's Avatar
1JZ powered
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
From: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Originally posted by Scott 89t2
well acording to my insurance prices I think it's a super sports car LOL
Truer words have never been said.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 11:01 PM
  #19  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally posted by fastrotaries
An old man once said to me that a TRUE sports car, has only two seats, well balanced chasis, and doesn't come with a roof. I said wow, whoever paid a million for a Mclaren got ripped off, because that sucker has a roof.
Don't Mclaren's also have 3 seats? One in the middle with 2 passenger seats beside and behind the drivers seat. Man, that means it really isn't a sports car.

I think a sports car seats 2, drives the rear wheels, and is fairly lightweight. I believe all RX-7's meet those requirements.

On a different note (and I know this doesn't belong here, but I will say it anyway), has anyone seen the Dodge Razor concept car. Yeah, yeah, I know it's a Dodge, but it's supposed to have 240 hp, rwd, and weigh about 2200 pounds. Oh yeah, it's also supposed to cost $14,000. If they make that car, everyone and their dog will buy one, or maybe two at that price.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 11:14 PM
  #20  
Anderson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Winter Springs, FL
I think its kinda Stupid how some people with newwer "Sports" cars, talk down about "sports cars from the 80's and prior.

And then gain to some, a Sports car only has ONE SEAT.

And NO removing the pass. seat does not count.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 11:56 PM
  #21  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by peejay
The McLaren is nowhere NEAR a sports car.
The McLaren F1 isn't a sports car, it's a supercar!
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 12:18 AM
  #22  
photoresistor's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 199
Likes: 11
From: PDX
why does it matter how its classified...? its not like it changes how well it performs or how much you like it... its not that important.

(says the man who doesnt even own a 7)
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 12:42 AM
  #23  
Anderson's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Winter Springs, FL
Originally posted by photoresistor
why does it matter how its classified...? its not like it changes how well it performs or how much you like it... its not that important.

(says the man who doesnt even own a 7)

SO True.
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 12:50 AM
  #24  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
If you drive it for the sport (fun) of driving it, then by god call it a sports car, if you drive it just to get from point a to point b, call it a regular car, screw the rest
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 01:35 AM
  #25  
fastrotaries's Avatar
W. TX chirpin Monkey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
Who the hell cares..???? It doesn't have any pistons!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 PM.