Exhaust Question: True Dual Better Then Y-Pipe?
#26
Manual Rack
iTrader: (50)
With all this talk about true duals, I have a RB true dual without the 5/6 port tube on it. The thing is in very good shape with minimal rust in between the 2 pipes and has never had an exhaust mounted to it, just mounted on the engine. I'll sell mine for 150+ shipping if anyone is interested just PM me.
#27
Rotaries confuse me
iTrader: (7)
no one here has mentioned the advantage of a collected system, which is exhaust pulse scavenging (sorry that may not be the exact term).
a true dual is used for maximum flow and you don't have to worry about the tuned collector length. however to get the most of the engine it seems that a collected system is usually used. the problem is there is usually a lot of experimentation to be done to find the correct collected length, and this also depends on application and power band requirements.
when i say "collected" i mean the point at which the two primary exhaust runners meet. in the stock NA system the collector is pretty much right at the exhaust ports due to the exhaust manifold.
a true dual is used for maximum flow and you don't have to worry about the tuned collector length. however to get the most of the engine it seems that a collected system is usually used. the problem is there is usually a lot of experimentation to be done to find the correct collected length, and this also depends on application and power band requirements.
when i say "collected" i mean the point at which the two primary exhaust runners meet. in the stock NA system the collector is pretty much right at the exhaust ports due to the exhaust manifold.
#29
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not to hijak or anything .But I a question. I have been thinking about exhaust for a while and am trying to figure what to get.My fc is 99% stock engine wise. Would I be ok with a collected sytem that racing beat sells or should I just spring for the true dual?
#30
Get The Racing Beat headers (2 pipes one from each rotor), then have a custom built from there, with Mid section compressing 2 seperate silencers fed from the header, Then have them converge together to form one pipe that runs to one back box and single exit.
Last edited by tomoaac; 05-18-07 at 05:57 PM.
#34
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
The velocity is directly related to the pressure. Pressure increases to the square of velocity, so if you double the velocity, the pressure is quadrupled. The word "overcome" doesn't make any sense in this context.
Sorry, but everything you stated is completely wrong...
Sorry, but everything you stated is completely wrong...
#35
[QUOTE=NZConvertible;6955043]The velocity is directly related to the pressure. Pressure increases to the square of velocity, so if you double the velocity, the pressure is quadrupled. The word "overcome" doesn't make any sense in this context.
QUOTE]
I've been thinking about the problem, Not sure everything i said as been right so far.
It all comes done to The fricton factor of the piping taken from the Moody chart, and Minor losses within the exhaust system, Both of which have a velocity squared term within them.
Minor losses deal with changes in velocity and direction of the gases, ie bends and areas were the pipes narrow or open up.
Using the bernoulli's equation,That deal totaly with flow I think the outcome would be that if you increase velocity back pressure will increase squared
to keep minor losses down to min, Pipes need to be as stright as possible.
To get least back pressure need large diameter pipe to keep velocity low
QUOTE]
I've been thinking about the problem, Not sure everything i said as been right so far.
It all comes done to The fricton factor of the piping taken from the Moody chart, and Minor losses within the exhaust system, Both of which have a velocity squared term within them.
Minor losses deal with changes in velocity and direction of the gases, ie bends and areas were the pipes narrow or open up.
Using the bernoulli's equation,That deal totaly with flow I think the outcome would be that if you increase velocity back pressure will increase squared
to keep minor losses down to min, Pipes need to be as stright as possible.
To get least back pressure need large diameter pipe to keep velocity low
Last edited by tomoaac; 05-18-07 at 07:22 PM.
#37
I really Schruted it
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#38
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hm, interesting.
To get the scavenging effect, you don't want the piping to big since you want just enough velocity.
Now there was a debate over on TeamFC3S about this and between that and reading up online about velocity, the bigger the pipe on a N/A, the worse it is since the exhaust pulse now has to push against stalled air instead of having the possitive pressure side of the exhaust pulse pulled into the negitive exhaust pulse before it. This correct?
To get least back pressure need large diameter pipe to keep velocity low
Now there was a debate over on TeamFC3S about this and between that and reading up online about velocity, the bigger the pipe on a N/A, the worse it is since the exhaust pulse now has to push against stalled air instead of having the possitive pressure side of the exhaust pulse pulled into the negitive exhaust pulse before it. This correct?
#39
Dork
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't forget resonance and exhaust scavenging.
For a S5 (S4?) NA rotary, the intake has a VDI (variable dynamic intake), also known as a resonant intake, where the intake ports are interconnected. The way it works is that the intake manifold is designed so that at a chosen RPM the high pressure wave from one intake port arrives at the other intake port just before it closes, pushing a little bit more air into the combustion chamber. This gives you better volumetric efficiency and thus more power, and is what Mazda is talking about when they say 'natural supercharging effect'.
The same principle applies to a collected exhaust, but in reverse. With an exhaust, at the proper RPM the low pressure wave from one port arrives at the other exhaust port just before it closes, sucking or 'scavenging' a little more exhaust gas out.
All the above is factual, below is what I conclude from it.
A true dual probably isn't such a great idea for rotaries since you won't get a scavenging effect, since the ports wouldn't be interconnected. I think true duals were probably developed for V6 and V8 applications, where the exhaust ports are on opposite sides of the engine and you have multiple ports on each side.
I don't know if aftermarket collected exhaust headers are designed for scavenging or not, if they are I would really like to get a look at their calculations, since I plan to design and build my own this year.
The same principle applies to a collected exhaust, but in reverse. With an exhaust, at the proper RPM the low pressure wave from one port arrives at the other exhaust port just before it closes, sucking or 'scavenging' a little more exhaust gas out.
All the above is factual, below is what I conclude from it.
A true dual probably isn't such a great idea for rotaries since you won't get a scavenging effect, since the ports wouldn't be interconnected. I think true duals were probably developed for V6 and V8 applications, where the exhaust ports are on opposite sides of the engine and you have multiple ports on each side.
I don't know if aftermarket collected exhaust headers are designed for scavenging or not, if they are I would really like to get a look at their calculations, since I plan to design and build my own this year.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
04-14-16 12:58 PM