2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Exhaust Question: True Dual Better Then Y-Pipe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-07, 12:57 PM
  #26  
Manual Rack

iTrader: (50)
 
FelixIsGod29X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wanaque NJ
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
With all this talk about true duals, I have a RB true dual without the 5/6 port tube on it. The thing is in very good shape with minimal rust in between the 2 pipes and has never had an exhaust mounted to it, just mounted on the engine. I'll sell mine for 150+ shipping if anyone is interested just PM me.
Old 05-18-07, 01:17 PM
  #27  
Rotaries confuse me

iTrader: (7)
 
My5ABaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by coldfire
no one here has mentioned the advantage of a collected system, which is exhaust pulse scavenging (sorry that may not be the exact term).
a true dual is used for maximum flow and you don't have to worry about the tuned collector length. however to get the most of the engine it seems that a collected system is usually used. the problem is there is usually a lot of experimentation to be done to find the correct collected length, and this also depends on application and power band requirements.

when i say "collected" i mean the point at which the two primary exhaust runners meet. in the stock NA system the collector is pretty much right at the exhaust ports due to the exhaust manifold.
Read my previous post.
Old 05-18-07, 01:38 PM
  #28  
ERTW

iTrader: (1)
 
coldfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by My5ABaby
Read my previous post.
ah i skipped that. good post.
Old 05-18-07, 05:42 PM
  #29  
Junior Member

 
JustJeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to hijak or anything .But I a question. I have been thinking about exhaust for a while and am trying to figure what to get.My fc is 99% stock engine wise. Would I be ok with a collected sytem that racing beat sells or should I just spring for the true dual?
Old 05-18-07, 05:50 PM
  #30  
Full Member

 
tomoaac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JustJeremy
Not to hijak or anything .But I a question. I have been thinking about exhaust for a while and am trying to figure what to get.My fc is 99% stock engine wise. Would I be ok with a collected sytem that racing beat sells or should I just spring for the true dual?
Get The Racing Beat headers (2 pipes one from each rotor), then have a custom built from there, with Mid section compressing 2 seperate silencers fed from the header, Then have them converge together to form one pipe that runs to one back box and single exit.

Last edited by tomoaac; 05-18-07 at 05:57 PM.
Old 05-18-07, 05:54 PM
  #31  
Junior Member

 
JustJeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
would that be the dual header or the other?
Old 05-18-07, 05:56 PM
  #32  
Full Member

 
tomoaac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just edited above, the dual header, keeping both rotors seperate up until the converge point after the mid silencers.
Old 05-18-07, 05:57 PM
  #33  
strictly business

iTrader: (8)
 
KeloidJonesJr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: chamber of farts
Posts: 6,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stock mufflers are heavy, so any aftermarket parts for it should be an improvement.
Old 05-18-07, 06:45 PM
  #34  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaMan99
...isn't there a certain point where velocity can overcome pressure?
The velocity is directly related to the pressure. Pressure increases to the square of velocity, so if you double the velocity, the pressure is quadrupled. The word "overcome" doesn't make any sense in this context.

Originally Posted by lax-rotor
Not to say that what you have stated is inaccurate...
Sorry, but everything you stated is completely wrong...
Old 05-18-07, 07:16 PM
  #35  
Full Member

 
tomoaac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=NZConvertible;6955043]The velocity is directly related to the pressure. Pressure increases to the square of velocity, so if you double the velocity, the pressure is quadrupled. The word "overcome" doesn't make any sense in this context.
QUOTE]

I've been thinking about the problem, Not sure everything i said as been right so far.

It all comes done to The fricton factor of the piping taken from the Moody chart, and Minor losses within the exhaust system, Both of which have a velocity squared term within them.

Minor losses deal with changes in velocity and direction of the gases, ie bends and areas were the pipes narrow or open up.

Using the bernoulli's equation,That deal totaly with flow I think the outcome would be that if you increase velocity back pressure will increase squared
to keep minor losses down to min, Pipes need to be as stright as possible.

To get least back pressure need large diameter pipe to keep velocity low

Last edited by tomoaac; 05-18-07 at 07:22 PM.
Old 05-18-07, 07:24 PM
  #36  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by tomoaac
Using the bernoulli's equation,That deal totaly with flow I think the outcome would be that if you increase velocity back pressure will increase squared
That's what I just said...
Old 05-18-07, 07:38 PM
  #37  
I really Schruted it

 
RX7Tuner.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eatmyclutch
Stock mufflers are heavy, so any aftermarket parts for it should be an improvement.

MY RB mufflers are heavier than my stock ones. But I still think you are correct in saying they are an improvement.
Old 05-18-07, 07:48 PM
  #38  
Rotary Freak

 
RotaMan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hm, interesting.

To get least back pressure need large diameter pipe to keep velocity low
To get the scavenging effect, you don't want the piping to big since you want just enough velocity.

Now there was a debate over on TeamFC3S about this and between that and reading up online about velocity, the bigger the pipe on a N/A, the worse it is since the exhaust pulse now has to push against stalled air instead of having the possitive pressure side of the exhaust pulse pulled into the negitive exhaust pulse before it. This correct?
Old 05-19-07, 08:34 AM
  #39  
Dork

 
sniperstevedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget resonance and exhaust scavenging.

For a S5 (S4?) NA rotary, the intake has a VDI (variable dynamic intake), also known as a resonant intake, where the intake ports are interconnected. The way it works is that the intake manifold is designed so that at a chosen RPM the high pressure wave from one intake port arrives at the other intake port just before it closes, pushing a little bit more air into the combustion chamber. This gives you better volumetric efficiency and thus more power, and is what Mazda is talking about when they say 'natural supercharging effect'.

The same principle applies to a collected exhaust, but in reverse. With an exhaust, at the proper RPM the low pressure wave from one port arrives at the other exhaust port just before it closes, sucking or 'scavenging' a little more exhaust gas out.

All the above is factual, below is what I conclude from it.

A true dual probably isn't such a great idea for rotaries since you won't get a scavenging effect, since the ports wouldn't be interconnected. I think true duals were probably developed for V6 and V8 applications, where the exhaust ports are on opposite sides of the engine and you have multiple ports on each side.

I don't know if aftermarket collected exhaust headers are designed for scavenging or not, if they are I would really like to get a look at their calculations, since I plan to design and build my own this year.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Monsterbox
Single Turbo RX-7's
22
07-29-22 10:48 PM
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
02-26-21 10:12 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
04-14-16 12:58 PM



Quick Reply: Exhaust Question: True Dual Better Then Y-Pipe?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 PM.