2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Exhaust Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #1  
dorkman52000's Avatar
Thread Starter
I wish I had a turbo....
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Watsonville, CA
Exhaust Question

Would adding a custom header to a high-flow cat system help performance, or just waste time? I have a Pacesetter header at home from my previous car, and I'm looking to get a high-flow cat system like the one I had (Bonez), but the length of the header is too long. Just wondering if it would be beneficial to shorten the header, retain the O2 sensor bung, and attach it to the cat system; or is all that work just not doing anything more than what the OEM manifold attached to the high-flow cat system can do?

I know you're all thinking, "Dude, just go straight-pipe" I did that with my previous car ('87 N/A) and it sounded badass with the header and mufflers, but did not run very well. I want to keep cats for CA smog reasons (regulations actually...I could care less about the pollution created from one RX-7) as well as actually being able to pass the strict standards here. Thoughts? Comments? Thanks!

-Bryan
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #2  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by dorkman52000
Would adding a custom header to a high-flow cat system help performance, or just waste time? I have a Pacesetter header at home from my previous car, and I'm looking to get a high-flow cat system like the one I had (Bonez), but the length of the header is too long. Just wondering if it would be beneficial to shorten the header, retain the O2 sensor bung, and attach it to the cat system; or is all that work just not doing anything more than what the OEM manifold attached to the high-flow cat system can do?

I know you're all thinking, "Dude, just go straight-pipe" I did that with my previous car ('87 N/A) and it sounded badass with the header and mufflers, but did not run very well. I want to keep cats for CA smog reasons (regulations actually...I could care less about the pollution created from one RX-7) as well as actually being able to pass the strict standards here. Thoughts? Comments? Thanks!

-Bryan
There will be a negligible power difference by using the stock manifold over the modified pace setter header.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #3  
bigdongsr94's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Columbus OH
im sure adding your new exhaust and retaining the cat would still increase power, it would also sound better. One thing to remember is the 6 port works with back pressure to open the secondaries. You need some back pressure to open them. Better yet with all those miles read up on a rebuild and while your at it port that thing.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #4  
dorkman52000's Avatar
Thread Starter
I wish I had a turbo....
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Watsonville, CA
Originally Posted by bigdongsr94
im sure adding your new exhaust and retaining the cat would still increase power, it would also sound better. One thing to remember is the 6 port works with back pressure to open the secondaries. You need some back pressure to open them. Better yet with all those miles read up on a rebuild and while your at it port that thing.
Yeah, I am keeping the 5th and 6th port actuators in mind, which is another reason why I don't want to go straight-pipe from header to mufflers like on my previous car. I am also planning on a rebuild for this engine, but not until the thing craps out on me. I have read procedures on how to port it and stuff and will likely do it while I have the chance WHEN I get to that point.

Thanks for replying. I figured there might be a chance that the hp increase would not be significant even after I severely modified that header I have to fit with the exhaust system I have planned, but I wanted to hear it from you experts first
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #5  
YearsOfDecay's Avatar
Locust of the apocalypse
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 2
From: Directly above the center of the earth (York, PA)
Don't bother with the header...... thats my thoughts..... not worth the hassle of you are keeping the cat
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #6  
NorCal90's Avatar
Pistons... Bah!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Redding, CA
Correct me if I'm wrong but I didn't think any porting of the engine would allow your car to pass CA smog laws. You seem to want to stay legal so I might be careful of that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
Apr 14, 2016 12:58 PM
12abridgeport
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Aug 17, 2015 06:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 PM.