2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

exhaust inserts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 11:38 AM
  #1  
onefastrx712a's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: San Leon
exhaust inserts

Im rebuilding my 87 na and doing a mild streetport on the intake and exhaust. I did a search and came up with more questions than answers about removing the exhaust inserts, grinding the baffles out of the insert, or using tII inserts... Is completely removing them a bad idea? Where do I find the tII inserts? I know that it will be loader without the inserts (or with the tII inserts) any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 12:27 PM
  #2  
jjwalker's Avatar
MECP Certified Installer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 3
From: Mesquite, TX-DFW
You can get rid of the baffle with a plasma cutter and then grind it smooth. Easier way, just get some TII inserts. Don't remove them and leave them out!

Inconel is some hard ****, if you try and grind the baffles out....I hope you are patient and have lot's of bits. If you can't get a hold of a plasma cutter, just get some TII inserts.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 02:12 PM
  #3  
onefastrx712a's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: San Leon
would it be bad to put the inserts back in after porting? would that counteract the porting?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 02:32 PM
  #4  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
The N/A inserts minimize exhaust gas reversion. They improve fuel economy, reduce noise, and widen the power band. You shouldn't port the exhaust on a street driven non-turbo engine. I would leave the stock non turbo inserts in the housings and do a mild port job on the intake ports.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 02:55 PM
  #5  
onefastrx712a's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: San Leon
too late for that..so should i put the inserts back in?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 03:07 PM
  #6  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Yes.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 03:23 PM
  #7  
HAILERS2's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 2
From: FORT WORTH TEXAS
The N/A inserts minimize exhaust gas reversion.

Ignorant here. Reversion, does that mean exhaust gas going into the intake stroke charge?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 09:34 PM
  #8  
jjwalker's Avatar
MECP Certified Installer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 3
From: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Ummm, I have always been told, even by the guys a rotary performance, that the keep the engine from being too noisy by delaying full exhaust port opening right off the bat.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 09:44 PM
  #9  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by HAILERS2
The N/A inserts minimize exhaust gas reversion.

Ignorant here. Reversion, does that mean exhaust gas going into the intake stroke charge?
I thought so. Illogical?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 09:49 PM
  #10  
nycgps's Avatar
PedoBear
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 2
From: Bye NYC. you SUCKED!
Originally Posted by PvillKnight7
The N/A inserts minimize exhaust gas reversion. They improve fuel economy, reduce noise, and widen the power band. You shouldn't port the exhaust on a street driven non-turbo engine. I would leave the stock non turbo inserts in the housings and do a mild port job on the intake ports.
Assume you're using Turbo housing for N/A Engine, would street porting it :

- suck *** fuel economy (if its not the worst already, how much less mpg should I expect?)
- loud as f!@# (will it turn the car into a cop magnet ?)
- narrower power band ? (so only mid range rpm usable now ? or higher rpm ?)

Cuz Im thinking should I do a full street porting (intake & exhaust using Turbo housing)
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 10:01 PM
  #11  
onefastrx712a's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: San Leon
Originally Posted by jjwalker
Ummm, I have always been told, even by the guys a rotary performance, that the keep the engine from being too noisy by delaying full exhaust port opening right off the bat.
Thats what I thought, if it just about noise im not too worried about that. is anyone running without them?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 10:29 PM
  #12  
jjwalker's Avatar
MECP Certified Installer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 3
From: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Originally Posted by onefastrx712a
Thats what I thought, if it just about noise im not too worried about that. is anyone running without them?
I have no baffles, but I have the inserts still there. Dont run without them or you'll have fluid dynamic problems with exhaust gas I wont get into. I also have slightly ported exhaust ports (not quite a street port, but not stock either). My intake is left unchanged.

Low rpm suffers a tad but 3k and above is MUCH better.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 01:55 AM
  #13  
HAILERS2's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 2
From: FORT WORTH TEXAS
Originally Posted by PvillKnight7
I thought so. Illogical?
No. Just saying I don't KNOW. Just wondering, that's all. Made sense to me.

That online training manual shows what is shown in the attached jpg. Mentions something about smoother exhaust flow. I still like the reversion idea though.
Attached Thumbnails exhaust inserts-multi.jpg   exhaust inserts-multitwo.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 02:44 AM
  #14  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
http://www.mazdatrix.com/faq/6pexh.htm

For what it's worth, I put turbo exhaust sleeves into my S5 6port block when I rebuilt it. Also polished the exhaust ports and smoothed the intake runners. Port matched the intake manifolds. I can't comment on power gains because the engine was tired before the rebuild. It eventually lost an apex seal due to carbon buildup.

I have a main cat only on stock exhaust. I don't think it's loud but again, I don't have a benchmark.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 05:45 PM
  #15  
onefastrx712a's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: San Leon
well i got the plasma cutter out and got to cutting and grinding, sanding. about 4 hours later, they look pretty good. (good enough for the ****** I go out with) I can post pictures tomorrow.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2011 | 09:49 PM
  #16  
jjwalker's Avatar
MECP Certified Installer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 3
From: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Originally Posted by onefastrx712a
well i got the plasma cutter out and got to cutting and grinding, sanding. about 4 hours later, they look pretty good. (good enough for the ****** I go out with) I can post pictures tomorrow.
Cool. I want to see.

Did you actually port them or just remove the diffuser?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 02:57 AM
  #17  
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
rotors excite me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 9
From: Central Iowa
Originally Posted by onefastrx712a
Thats what I thought, if it just about noise im not too worried about that. is anyone running without them?
To answer your question, yes, there are people who run without them. I don't know much else about the subject though. I do know personally I'm going to keep my turbo inserts (on my turbo motor). If I ever do anything else with them I would port/polish them. I also plan on keeping a turbo on the motor, so this really doesn't apply to me...
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 10:22 AM
  #18  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Don't run without them. It tends to kill velocity at the port and leads to higher coolant temps.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 10:22 AM
  #19  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
I've removed the diffuser with an endmill but decided not to use them because of the large square hole in the insert. It looked like it would hurt performance wise more than help it...
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 10:43 AM
  #20  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Sorry, let me clarify. I meant not to remove the sleeve. The diffuser I can't say for sure if there is any effect on power, but it certainly makes the car a crapload louder. Mazda's primary reason for including them seemed to be to cause a more gradual opening of the exhaust port to reduce noise.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 09:27 PM
  #21  
onefastrx712a's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: San Leon
here are the inserts after a lot of grinding
Attached Thumbnails exhaust inserts-018-1.jpg   exhaust inserts-011-2.jpg   exhaust inserts-009-4.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 10:22 PM
  #22  
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
rotors excite me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 9
From: Central Iowa
since someone mentioned Inconel, here's a neat, brief read on the stuff
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inconel
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 10:46 PM
  #23  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by nycgps
Assume you're using Turbo housing for N/A Engine, would street porting it :

- suck *** fuel economy (if its not the worst already, how much less mpg should I expect?)
- loud as f!@# (will it turn the car into a cop magnet ?)
- narrower power band ? (so only mid range rpm usable now ? or higher rpm ?)

Cuz Im thinking should I do a full street porting (intake & exhaust using Turbo housing)
every ported motor i've ever dealt with has been built from mostly NEW parts, and was also using some kind of tunable ecu/fuel control.

-fuel economy. this is more dependent on pumping losses, free up the exhaust and MPG improves, and it doesn't seem to matter what port you have. my friend had a bridgeport 13B with a holley, and it got 26mpg, which is just as good as my old gsl-se with RB exhaust.

-on a turbo car it will make more noise from the intake. the other thing is a ported engine needs to have a freer flow exhaust, which is usually louder.

- again, using new parts, they usually make more power everywhere. mazda's papers show that you do trade off low end for top end, so maybe new rotors, irons, and rotor housings make up for it? my friends old mild port S5 t2 motor was great, with a 60-1 turbo it made more power @2000 than my stock port stock turbo car, we both ran the RB turbo back. he made 392@12psi
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 08:43 AM
  #24  
onefastrx712a's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: San Leon
so how did I do on the inserts? they should work out huh?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 10:32 AM
  #25  
nycgps's Avatar
PedoBear
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 2
From: Bye NYC. you SUCKED!
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
every ported motor i've ever dealt with has been built from mostly NEW parts, and was also using some kind of tunable ecu/fuel control.

-fuel economy. this is more dependent on pumping losses, free up the exhaust and MPG improves, and it doesn't seem to matter what port you have. my friend had a bridgeport 13B with a holley, and it got 26mpg, which is just as good as my old gsl-se with RB exhaust.

-on a turbo car it will make more noise from the intake. the other thing is a ported engine needs to have a freer flow exhaust, which is usually louder.

- again, using new parts, they usually make more power everywhere. mazda's papers show that you do trade off low end for top end, so maybe new rotors, irons, and rotor housings make up for it? my friends old mild port S5 t2 motor was great, with a 60-1 turbo it made more power @2000 than my stock port stock turbo car, we both ran the RB turbo back. he made 392@12psi
Thx for clearing that up

One more question tho, I wonder if Stock ECU/tune would be able to run Street ported engine, at least for a while.

Cuz some family issue came up and I don't think I will be "Free" to get it tune or change the ECU to some stage1/2 setup for a while. but I can still push it/drive it without blowing it up? probably worst mpg ?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.