2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

exhaust inserts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-11, 11:38 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
onefastrx712a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Leon
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
exhaust inserts

Im rebuilding my 87 na and doing a mild streetport on the intake and exhaust. I did a search and came up with more questions than answers about removing the exhaust inserts, grinding the baffles out of the insert, or using tII inserts... Is completely removing them a bad idea? Where do I find the tII inserts? I know that it will be loader without the inserts (or with the tII inserts) any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.
Old 04-15-11, 12:27 PM
  #2  
MECP Certified Installer

 
jjwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
You can get rid of the baffle with a plasma cutter and then grind it smooth. Easier way, just get some TII inserts. Don't remove them and leave them out!

Inconel is some hard ****, if you try and grind the baffles out....I hope you are patient and have lot's of bits. If you can't get a hold of a plasma cutter, just get some TII inserts.
Old 04-15-11, 02:12 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
onefastrx712a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Leon
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
would it be bad to put the inserts back in after porting? would that counteract the porting?
Old 04-15-11, 02:32 PM
  #4  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (16)
 
PvillKnight7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The N/A inserts minimize exhaust gas reversion. They improve fuel economy, reduce noise, and widen the power band. You shouldn't port the exhaust on a street driven non-turbo engine. I would leave the stock non turbo inserts in the housings and do a mild port job on the intake ports.
Old 04-15-11, 02:55 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
onefastrx712a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Leon
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
too late for that..so should i put the inserts back in?
Old 04-15-11, 03:07 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (16)
 
PvillKnight7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yes.
Old 04-15-11, 03:23 PM
  #7  
Rotary Freak
 
HAILERS2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: FORT WORTH TEXAS
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The N/A inserts minimize exhaust gas reversion.

Ignorant here. Reversion, does that mean exhaust gas going into the intake stroke charge?
Old 04-15-11, 09:34 PM
  #8  
MECP Certified Installer

 
jjwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ummm, I have always been told, even by the guys a rotary performance, that the keep the engine from being too noisy by delaying full exhaust port opening right off the bat.
Old 04-15-11, 09:44 PM
  #9  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (16)
 
PvillKnight7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by HAILERS2
The N/A inserts minimize exhaust gas reversion.

Ignorant here. Reversion, does that mean exhaust gas going into the intake stroke charge?
I thought so. Illogical?
Old 04-15-11, 09:49 PM
  #10  
PedoBear

iTrader: (4)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bye NYC. you SUCKED!
Posts: 1,429
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by PvillKnight7
The N/A inserts minimize exhaust gas reversion. They improve fuel economy, reduce noise, and widen the power band. You shouldn't port the exhaust on a street driven non-turbo engine. I would leave the stock non turbo inserts in the housings and do a mild port job on the intake ports.
Assume you're using Turbo housing for N/A Engine, would street porting it :

- suck *** fuel economy (if its not the worst already, how much less mpg should I expect?)
- loud as f!@# (will it turn the car into a cop magnet ?)
- narrower power band ? (so only mid range rpm usable now ? or higher rpm ?)

Cuz Im thinking should I do a full street porting (intake & exhaust using Turbo housing)
Old 04-15-11, 10:01 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
onefastrx712a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Leon
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jjwalker
Ummm, I have always been told, even by the guys a rotary performance, that the keep the engine from being too noisy by delaying full exhaust port opening right off the bat.
Thats what I thought, if it just about noise im not too worried about that. is anyone running without them?
Old 04-15-11, 10:29 PM
  #12  
MECP Certified Installer

 
jjwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by onefastrx712a
Thats what I thought, if it just about noise im not too worried about that. is anyone running without them?
I have no baffles, but I have the inserts still there. Dont run without them or you'll have fluid dynamic problems with exhaust gas I wont get into. I also have slightly ported exhaust ports (not quite a street port, but not stock either). My intake is left unchanged.

Low rpm suffers a tad but 3k and above is MUCH better.
Old 04-16-11, 01:55 AM
  #13  
Rotary Freak
 
HAILERS2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: FORT WORTH TEXAS
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by PvillKnight7
I thought so. Illogical?
No. Just saying I don't KNOW. Just wondering, that's all. Made sense to me.

That online training manual shows what is shown in the attached jpg. Mentions something about smoother exhaust flow. I still like the reversion idea though.
Attached Thumbnails exhaust inserts-multi.jpg   exhaust inserts-multitwo.jpg  
Old 04-16-11, 02:44 AM
  #14  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (16)
 
PvillKnight7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
http://www.mazdatrix.com/faq/6pexh.htm

For what it's worth, I put turbo exhaust sleeves into my S5 6port block when I rebuilt it. Also polished the exhaust ports and smoothed the intake runners. Port matched the intake manifolds. I can't comment on power gains because the engine was tired before the rebuild. It eventually lost an apex seal due to carbon buildup.

I have a main cat only on stock exhaust. I don't think it's loud but again, I don't have a benchmark.
Old 04-16-11, 05:45 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
onefastrx712a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Leon
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well i got the plasma cutter out and got to cutting and grinding, sanding. about 4 hours later, they look pretty good. (good enough for the ****** I go out with) I can post pictures tomorrow.
Old 04-16-11, 09:49 PM
  #16  
MECP Certified Installer

 
jjwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by onefastrx712a
well i got the plasma cutter out and got to cutting and grinding, sanding. about 4 hours later, they look pretty good. (good enough for the ****** I go out with) I can post pictures tomorrow.
Cool. I want to see.

Did you actually port them or just remove the diffuser?
Old 04-17-11, 02:57 AM
  #17  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by onefastrx712a
Thats what I thought, if it just about noise im not too worried about that. is anyone running without them?
To answer your question, yes, there are people who run without them. I don't know much else about the subject though. I do know personally I'm going to keep my turbo inserts (on my turbo motor). If I ever do anything else with them I would port/polish them. I also plan on keeping a turbo on the motor, so this really doesn't apply to me...
Old 04-17-11, 10:22 AM
  #18  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Don't run without them. It tends to kill velocity at the port and leads to higher coolant temps.
Old 04-17-11, 10:22 AM
  #19  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (16)
 
PvillKnight7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I've removed the diffuser with an endmill but decided not to use them because of the large square hole in the insert. It looked like it would hurt performance wise more than help it...
Old 04-17-11, 10:43 AM
  #20  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Sorry, let me clarify. I meant not to remove the sleeve. The diffuser I can't say for sure if there is any effect on power, but it certainly makes the car a crapload louder. Mazda's primary reason for including them seemed to be to cause a more gradual opening of the exhaust port to reduce noise.
Old 04-17-11, 09:27 PM
  #21  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
onefastrx712a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Leon
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here are the inserts after a lot of grinding
Attached Thumbnails exhaust inserts-018-1.jpg   exhaust inserts-011-2.jpg   exhaust inserts-009-4.jpg  
Old 04-17-11, 10:22 PM
  #22  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
since someone mentioned Inconel, here's a neat, brief read on the stuff
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inconel
Old 04-17-11, 10:46 PM
  #23  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,829
Received 2,597 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
Assume you're using Turbo housing for N/A Engine, would street porting it :

- suck *** fuel economy (if its not the worst already, how much less mpg should I expect?)
- loud as f!@# (will it turn the car into a cop magnet ?)
- narrower power band ? (so only mid range rpm usable now ? or higher rpm ?)

Cuz Im thinking should I do a full street porting (intake & exhaust using Turbo housing)
every ported motor i've ever dealt with has been built from mostly NEW parts, and was also using some kind of tunable ecu/fuel control.

-fuel economy. this is more dependent on pumping losses, free up the exhaust and MPG improves, and it doesn't seem to matter what port you have. my friend had a bridgeport 13B with a holley, and it got 26mpg, which is just as good as my old gsl-se with RB exhaust.

-on a turbo car it will make more noise from the intake. the other thing is a ported engine needs to have a freer flow exhaust, which is usually louder.

- again, using new parts, they usually make more power everywhere. mazda's papers show that you do trade off low end for top end, so maybe new rotors, irons, and rotor housings make up for it? my friends old mild port S5 t2 motor was great, with a 60-1 turbo it made more power @2000 than my stock port stock turbo car, we both ran the RB turbo back. he made 392@12psi
Old 04-18-11, 08:43 AM
  #24  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
onefastrx712a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Leon
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so how did I do on the inserts? they should work out huh?
Old 04-18-11, 10:32 AM
  #25  
PedoBear

iTrader: (4)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bye NYC. you SUCKED!
Posts: 1,429
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
every ported motor i've ever dealt with has been built from mostly NEW parts, and was also using some kind of tunable ecu/fuel control.

-fuel economy. this is more dependent on pumping losses, free up the exhaust and MPG improves, and it doesn't seem to matter what port you have. my friend had a bridgeport 13B with a holley, and it got 26mpg, which is just as good as my old gsl-se with RB exhaust.

-on a turbo car it will make more noise from the intake. the other thing is a ported engine needs to have a freer flow exhaust, which is usually louder.

- again, using new parts, they usually make more power everywhere. mazda's papers show that you do trade off low end for top end, so maybe new rotors, irons, and rotor housings make up for it? my friends old mild port S5 t2 motor was great, with a 60-1 turbo it made more power @2000 than my stock port stock turbo car, we both ran the RB turbo back. he made 392@12psi
Thx for clearing that up

One more question tho, I wonder if Stock ECU/tune would be able to run Street ported engine, at least for a while.

Cuz some family issue came up and I don't think I will be "Free" to get it tune or change the ECU to some stage1/2 setup for a while. but I can still push it/drive it without blowing it up? probably worst mpg ?


Quick Reply: exhaust inserts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM.