2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Excessive fuel consumption.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-06, 01:31 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Excessive fuel consumption.

Weird. I just got my radiator replaced brand new & now my car gets only 80mi to a half a tank around town which is about 10mi to the gallon. Prior to replacing my radiator I was getting 110 to half a tank. Of course I was having to fill the rad. up a lot. I had people tell me that that replacing the radiator has no effect on fuel consumption so what gives? Any idea why the RX is guzzling the fuel now? BTW it idles fine @ start up, I shift below 3500rpm & drove 60-65 all week to work. The only problem I can see is that the battery meter read 12 on my dash all the time. And since there's no check engine light what do I start replacing? I'd replace the O2 TSP, Pulsation dampner or whatever if I new this would improve it. Thanks in advance.
Old 02-04-06, 07:31 AM
  #2  
Boosted. I got BLOWN!!!

iTrader: (29)
 
beefhole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Maybe your temperature sensor became unplugged? Quadruple check all your wiring and make sensors. Make sure nothing is busted/missing.
Old 02-04-06, 08:49 AM
  #3  
certified nutz and boltz

 
n/a-luvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: myrtle beach, sc
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You remember to reconnect the temp sensor that is mounted to the bottom of the radiator? Driver's side. ~rich
Old 02-04-06, 10:15 AM
  #4  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
That sensor does not effect fuel consumption. It's only for the cold start.

Make sure that all the other sensors are connected though, especially the coolant temp sensor on the back of the water pump.

When the rad was replaced, did someone do something stupid like eliminate the thermostat? If the thermostat was removed and the bypass plugged, the car may never reach operating temperature and suck fuel because of it.

Any other changes made during the replacement?
Old 02-04-06, 12:15 PM
  #5  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
That sensor does not effect fuel consumption. It's only for the cold start.

Make sure that all the other sensors are connected though, especially the coolant temp sensor on the back of the water pump.

When the rad was replaced, did someone do something stupid like eliminate the thermostat? If the thermostat was removed and the bypass plugged, the car may never reach operating temperature and suck fuel because of it.


Any other changes made during the replacement?
All good ideas. I had this changed by a mechanic so I thought nothing of checking. But I guess it's a good idea just to make sure nothing is dangling or missing. As for the thermostat I'll check that too and nothing else was replaced so, it's perplexing to me. Well here I go. Thank you for the quick response.
Old 02-04-06, 03:25 PM
  #6  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Mechanics generally suck. You need to double check their work because they have no clue.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
09-12-15 12:22 PM
whinin
New Member RX-7 Technical
10
09-05-15 11:52 PM



Quick Reply: Excessive fuel consumption.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.