2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Excessive fuel consumption.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 01:31 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Unhappy Excessive fuel consumption.

Weird. I just got my radiator replaced brand new & now my car gets only 80mi to a half a tank around town which is about 10mi to the gallon. Prior to replacing my radiator I was getting 110 to half a tank. Of course I was having to fill the rad. up a lot. I had people tell me that that replacing the radiator has no effect on fuel consumption so what gives? Any idea why the RX is guzzling the fuel now? BTW it idles fine @ start up, I shift below 3500rpm & drove 60-65 all week to work. The only problem I can see is that the battery meter read 12 on my dash all the time. And since there's no check engine light what do I start replacing? I'd replace the O2 TSP, Pulsation dampner or whatever if I new this would improve it. Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 07:31 AM
  #2  
beefhole's Avatar
Boosted. I got BLOWN!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
Maybe your temperature sensor became unplugged? Quadruple check all your wiring and make sensors. Make sure nothing is busted/missing.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 08:49 AM
  #3  
n/a-luvr's Avatar
certified nutz and boltz
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: myrtle beach, sc
You remember to reconnect the temp sensor that is mounted to the bottom of the radiator? Driver's side. ~rich
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 10:15 AM
  #4  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
That sensor does not effect fuel consumption. It's only for the cold start.

Make sure that all the other sensors are connected though, especially the coolant temp sensor on the back of the water pump.

When the rad was replaced, did someone do something stupid like eliminate the thermostat? If the thermostat was removed and the bypass plugged, the car may never reach operating temperature and suck fuel because of it.

Any other changes made during the replacement?
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
That sensor does not effect fuel consumption. It's only for the cold start.

Make sure that all the other sensors are connected though, especially the coolant temp sensor on the back of the water pump.

When the rad was replaced, did someone do something stupid like eliminate the thermostat? If the thermostat was removed and the bypass plugged, the car may never reach operating temperature and suck fuel because of it.


Any other changes made during the replacement?
All good ideas. I had this changed by a mechanic so I thought nothing of checking. But I guess it's a good idea just to make sure nothing is dangling or missing. As for the thermostat I'll check that too and nothing else was replaced so, it's perplexing to me. Well here I go. Thank you for the quick response.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #6  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Mechanics generally suck. You need to double check their work because they have no clue.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
Sep 12, 2015 12:22 PM
whinin
New Member RX-7 Technical
10
Sep 5, 2015 11:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.