2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Engine porting with Stock ECU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-08, 02:34 PM
  #1  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
Chaotic_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise Florida
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Engine porting with Stock ECU

ok
i am almost complete with rebuilding my engine, just waiting for some high compression rotors.

refer this thread for build-up:

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...turbo+rebuild\

what i want to know, is what is the very largest possible porting job that i can manage with having the stock ECU? right now i have given myself a nice sized streetport on my primarys, and left my 6 port end irons stock.

please dont just send me replies saying why i should get standalone.. it is not an option, my funds are insufficient for the time being. I am already aware that i have to run low boost to keep my engine from popping

all help and critique is welcome. and please post porting PICTURES

thanks in advance
Old 01-09-08, 03:01 PM
  #2  
707

 
RX7 allnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Santa Rosa Ca
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what turbo will you be running? anything other than a big street port will need a stand alone
Old 01-09-08, 03:24 PM
  #3  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
Chaotic_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise Florida
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i am running the same turbo as i have in the engine rebuild thread
it is out of a diesel truck i belive

and by big streetport, is it literally as big as i can get it, or are there limits (besides the water jacket)
Old 01-09-08, 03:46 PM
  #4  
707

 
RX7 allnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Santa Rosa Ca
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
changing the size and shape of the ports changes the tourqe curve either lower or higher or if done wrong just ruins it. i forget what company but they make a big street port template. h-bridge or full will reguire a stand alone
Old 01-09-08, 03:52 PM
  #5  
Turn up the boost
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 7,067
Received 91 Likes on 77 Posts
Stock ecu and a turbo other than factory doesn't work. Different turbos flow differently, stock ecu has no way to adjust.
Old 01-09-08, 03:52 PM
  #6  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
Chaotic_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise Florida
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
does anybody have any pics of what shaped ports create certain torque/hp curves?
i am not an idiot, i know what is completely wrong.. (i.e. mishapen, to far in or out)
but if i see a nice pic, i can base my job off of it.
Old 01-09-08, 04:02 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: rohnert park , ca
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1Revvin7
Stock ecu and a turbo other than factory doesn't work. Different turbos flow differently, stock ecu has no way to adjust.
this statement is incorrect, my friend is running a large To4 built by turbonectics and hes running 1 bar all on the stock ecu, by stock ecu i mean nothing done to it not even a chip. -mike
Old 01-09-08, 04:02 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: rohnert park , ca
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh and he also has a streetport on his motor.
Old 01-09-08, 04:06 PM
  #9  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
Chaotic_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise Florida
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by b18crx
this statement is incorrect, my friend is running a large To4 built by turbonectics and hes running 1 bar all on the stock ecu, by stock ecu i mean nothing done to it not even a chip. -mike
really?

so does that mean that with a turbo smaller than his i could run as high as a bar of boost???
Old 01-09-08, 04:43 PM
  #10  
W. TX chirpin Monkey

 
fastrotaries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mesquite, TX
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by b18crx
this statement is incorrect, my friend is running a large To4 built by turbonectics and hes running 1 bar all on the stock ecu, by stock ecu i mean nothing done to it not even a chip. -mike
NO piggy back either? stock injectors? Not being able to add more fuel will certainly cause a lean condition. In my experience you can make it work, but really it's a ticking time bomb. higher boost levels will also require timing adjustment.


If you can't afford a standalone, keep the boost low, until you find a way to control things better.
Old 01-09-08, 06:18 PM
  #11  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
The stock EFI system has an AFM, so it can compensate for more airflow to a degree. At some point you will max out the AFM and thus the ECU won't be able to read the increased airflow as it will be wide open.

Still, what you don't have with the stock ECU is good control over fuel, or any control over timing. Even if you keep the boost low on that turbo it's still going to flow way more then the stocker. If you want to do this crudely, then big secondary injectors and a piggyback will certainly give you enough fuel but you will need to really hose it in there since you can't pull back timing. And that makes the 4000 RPM area very dangerous as the injector switchover takes place. This has been done plenty of times in the past and certainly works, but only to a point. There's a reason why big turbo RX-7s are all running standalones.

Keep in mind that the 6 port end plates have way more port area then the TII engine, so you are already well past the port of even a ported 4 port engine as far as port size goes. I suggest simply leaving the port alone. No matter what you do to them, you will have a loss of low end when using a larger turbo and the low compression rotors. You can mitigate this loss of low end by building a new intake manifold, or using high compression rotors.
Old 01-09-08, 06:23 PM
  #12  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
Chaotic_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise Florida
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
The stock EFI system has an AFM, so it can compensate for more airflow to a degree. At some point you will max out the AFM and thus the ECU won't be able to read the increased airflow as it will be wide open.

Still, what you don't have with the stock ECU is good control over fuel, or any control over timing. Even if you keep the boost low on that turbo it's still going to flow way more then the stocker. If you want to do this crudely, then big secondary injectors and a piggyback will certainly give you enough fuel but you will need to really hose it in there since you can't pull back timing. And that makes the 4000 RPM area very dangerous as the injector switchover takes place. This has been done plenty of times in the past and certainly works, but only to a point. There's a reason why big turbo RX-7s are all running standalones.

Keep in mind that the 6 port end plates have way more port area then the TII engine, so you are already well past the port of even a ported 4 port engine as far as port size goes. I suggest simply leaving the port alone. No matter what you do to them, you will have a loss of low end when using a larger turbo and the low compression rotors. You can mitigate this loss of low end by building a new intake manifold, or using high compression rotors.

the 9.7 rotors are already on my to-buy list
Old 01-09-08, 06:30 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: rohnert park , ca
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fastrotaries
NO piggy back either? stock injectors? Not being able to add more fuel will certainly cause a lean condition. In my experience you can make it work, but really it's a ticking time bomb. higher boost levels will also require timing adjustment.


If you can't afford a standalone, keep the boost low, until you find a way to control things better.
Yes he has larger injectors and he's running an safc for piggyback but please explain to me how those mods are equal to a full standalone setup. No hard feelings but a piggyback and a standalone are not even comparable.-mike
Old 02-06-08, 11:19 PM
  #14  
Home-Made Turbo Nigga...
 
wafflesincars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by b18crx
Yes he has larger injectors and he's running an safc for piggyback but please explain to me how those mods are equal to a full standalone setup. No hard feelings but a piggyback and a standalone are not even comparable.-mike
Piggy back & standalone are totally and completely comparable, but far from equal.

They do the same thing to different degrees. You are adding more air with the turbocharger, with this you need more fuel to maintain a ratio that will combust at the proper time.

Therein lies the science of tuning an engine, a standalone gives you full control of when and how much fuel is added, as well as control over when it begins to combust.

Stop saying mods.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clacor
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
08-14-15 09:17 AM



Quick Reply: Engine porting with Stock ECU



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.