2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
View Poll Results: Mechanical Vs. Electrical?
Mechanical.......
1
33.33%
Electrical Gauges.......
2
66.67%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

Electrical Vs. Mechanical

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #1  
MazdaRx7Racer4Life's Avatar
Thread Starter
I AM A THIEF!! READ THE FEEDBACK SECTION!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Electrical Vs. Mechanical

Ok, I currently have greddy electrical boost gauge and egt gauge and have been getting mixed opinions from people. Which is better? An autometer mechanical boost gauge with the vacuum straight to the gauge, or the greddy with a sensor and a signal to the gauge?
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 03:17 PM
  #2  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
You are introducing 2 variables, Elec. vs Mech. and Greddy vs AutoMeter...

...I prefer the AutoMeter Mech over the AutoMeter electrical. My mech boost gauge works perfectly, same reading as my EMS and they are not tapped from the same line.

A lot of electrical gauges from AutoMeter, like my FP gauge, do not zero themselves correctly when off...I hate that

I consider the mech gauges to be more reliable than elect.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #3  
MazdaRx7Racer4Life's Avatar
Thread Starter
I AM A THIEF!! READ THE FEEDBACK SECTION!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
I meant elec vs. mech i general, I just put those as two examples.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #4  
cezonetheillest's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: spokane wa
i would have to agree with eViL rotor and say that mechanical is going to be more reliable.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 03:30 PM
  #5  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Electrical is generally easier to connect as you don't have to worry about actually bringing what you want to measure into the cabin (which in the case of fuel or oil, may have very specific regulations at the track). Mechanical gauges are generally cheaper. Both are equally accurate (usually).
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #6  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Another comparison between mech and electrical is that almost all mech gauges are full sweep, and many electrical gauges are not. Full sweep is easier to read accurately.
The higher-grade electrical gauges are full sweep.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 05:44 PM
  #7  
Scott 89t2's Avatar
SOLD THE RX-7!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally posted by eViLRotor

A lot of electrical gauges from AutoMeter, like my FP gauge, do not zero themselves correctly when off...I hate that
neither do the mech ones... the autometer has a big "box" where the o is and it never sits in the same spot. if they need a big box for 0 (2 or 3 psi wide) it tells you how good the gauge is
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SRTx781
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Dec 19, 2015 07:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 AM.