2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

E-Fan vs. Visko Fan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-05, 09:54 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
SpAm@FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E-Fan vs. Visko Fan

Hi guys!

I know the pros and cons of a E-Fan...

i only want to know how much m³ the visko fan per hour...

and with an e-fan, what is better?

blowing or sucking?

thank you!
Old 01-11-05, 11:27 AM
  #2  
Old Rotary Dog

 
wrankin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
do a search - it's been discussed ad nauseum. fan behind the radiator pulling air is better.
Old 01-11-05, 11:30 AM
  #3  
King of the Loop

 
BklynRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: brooklyn, New York
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arrow

Wouldnt an e-fan suck just like the clutch fan? either way look here:

http://www.aaroncake.net/rx-7/efanmyth.htm
Old 01-11-05, 12:06 PM
  #4  
Send me your BMX parts

 
raising arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Quartz Hill CA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have the E-fan mounted on the "engine compartment" side, then blowing onto to engine. This topic has been an issue for some. If the fan is blowing away from the engine and the fan is mounted like "above", the car will overheat.

Does this answer your question? The clutch fan works better (moves more air) but the E-fan looks nicer and is easier to work around.
Old 01-11-05, 01:39 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
SpAm@FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ok, thx 4 the blowing info...

but what i really want to know are the m³/hour of the Visco Fan! :/

no ideas?

--edit--

http://www.aaroncake.net/rx-7/efaninstall.htm

so i've seen that 2500 cfm/h are the minimum 4 a rotary...

so, i can get a efan with 4000m³/h, thats 13,333.33333 cfm/h!?!?!?!

1 cfm ~ 0,3 m³ or not?

I think that should be enough to cool the rotary like the visco fan or not?

Last edited by SpAm@FC; 01-11-05 at 01:51 PM.
Old 01-11-05, 05:50 PM
  #6  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
[QUOTE=SpAm@FC]so i've seen that 2500 cfm/h are the minimum 4 a rotary...

so, i can get a efan with 4000m³/h, thats 13,333.33333 cfm/h!?!?!?!

1 cfm ~ 0,3 m³ or not?
[QUOTE]

No.

1 CFM = 1.699m³/h


4000m³/h = 2354 CFM

No one knows the flow volume of the stock FC fan, partly because it varies according to engine temperature and engine speed... if it were as simply as revving it to 3000 rpm and throwing it on a flow bench, hell, I'd fund the $30 to test it.

Also, there is no such thing as CFM/hour. You measure flow, in your case, as cubic meters per hour, or more typically for Americans, in cubic feet per minute (CFM)>
You cannot have cubic feet per minute per hour.
The stock fan flows as much air as the engine need to maintain a given temperature, and only that amount.
Old 01-11-05, 06:06 PM
  #7  
Like Ghandi with a gun

 
Kenteth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpAm@FC

so, i can get a efan with 4000m³/h, thats 13,333.33333 cfm/h!?!?!?!
What the hell... learn sigfigs.

---


and this thread should just die, theres too many just like it had anyone take the thought to search.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
atticus_jay
Interior / Exterior / Audio
6
10-23-15 11:16 AM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
09-28-15 04:34 PM



Quick Reply: E-Fan vs. Visko Fan



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.