how acurate is it to call a 13B engine an inline 2, 6 litre, 1 stoke... lol

 

ummmmmm?>

 

definately NOT 6 liter.

 

Where in the hell do you get 6 liter?
Even if we went with the "other" people that add both housings, it's still only be 2.6liters.

 

wow that is a dumb question

 

lol....

 

Guys calm down, that was really bad reaction.

He's canadian, If he were american he would've written inline 2.6 liter. Same thing as 2,6 litre. Or did you really mean inline 2, 6 litre?


Edit: and it's not quite accurate. It breathes about the same as a 2.6 litre but it would be 2 stroke. And it does still use the full 4 stroke sequence but since no cylinders no strokes.

Edit 2: " people who add the other rotor" ---WTF?! 1.3 is from 1 face of each rotor. 650 or so cc each face, 2 faces (1 on each rotor) turn for each eccentric shaft rotation. IT IS BOTH ROTORS!!

 

if u measure it by the amount of air it displaces... it falls under the 6 litre catagory... thats where i got the 6 litre from...

 

well it is an inline 2... right? lol

 

It's a fairly common debate about whether a 13b is 1.3l or 2.6l. I'm not saying either one or the other. So, it's not my fault.

 

just call it what it is... a 2 rotor engine.

 

Amen Brotha Man

 

ya ..your correct ..it is a dumb question

 

my bad... *hangs head in shame*