2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

driveshafts...auto same as manual?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2002 | 12:42 AM
  #1  
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
Thread Starter
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
driveshafts...auto same as manual?

Alright my friend needs a driveshaft for his NA manual and I found this parts car GXL but its an auto. Will the driveshaft work in his car or no? Also there are alot of parts that can be used except the drivers door a rear quarter. How much would be too much and how much could I sell the engine for if it ran good? Thanks alot.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 12:52 AM
  #2  
Sniper_X's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 7
From: Lawrenceville, ga
no.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 11:09 AM
  #3  
vaughnc's Avatar
knowledge junkie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,595
Likes: 6
From: Atlanta, GA
sorry, the auto drivetrain doesn't work well with the manual.

Check mazdatrix.com for a cheap replacement though
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 01:27 PM
  #4  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
It works just fine. I have an auto driveshaft in my 5 speed GTU.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 05:14 PM
  #5  
Sniper_X's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 7
From: Lawrenceville, ga
reeeeeealy.
hmmmm......

ain't SUPPOSED to be that way.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 05:55 PM
  #6  
Eric Henry's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: KC KS
When I did my auto-5-speed conversion I did notice the driveshaft for the 5-speed was quite a bit longer. I would've rather kept the auto one because it was in exceptonally good condition. But how would the auto work with the 5-speed?
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 06:03 PM
  #7  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by Eric Henry
When I did my auto-5-speed conversion I did notice the driveshaft for the 5-speed was quite a bit longer. I would've rather kept the auto one because it was in exceptonally good condition. But how would the auto work with the 5-speed?
Yes, it is a little over 2" longer because the AT is longer than the MT. I would also like to know how he got it to fit. Um, on second thought, I don't think I want to know.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 07:07 PM
  #8  
Sniper_X's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 7
From: Lawrenceville, ga
"it is a little over 2" longer because the AT is longer than the MT"

Uhh that would make one or the other SHORTER... not longer.

Is this a typo?
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 08:47 PM
  #9  
Ranzo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 666
Likes: 2
From: Memphis, Japan
it is a little over 2" longer because the AT is longer than the MT"

Uhh that would make one or the other SHORTER... not longer.

Is this a typo?

It is all relative. The AT driveshaft is SHORTER than the MT. The MT driveshaft is LONGER than the AT.


or vice versa...........
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 08:48 PM
  #10  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
The final answer is no. Auto driveshafts cannot be swapped into any other RX-7 beisdes an auto. This also means that they will NOT match up a TII transmission to an NA diff.

If you need a driveshaft, I have one from my GX parts car...$30 plus shipping...has 145,000KM on it (90K miles?) and is smooooth...PM me if you care.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 10:42 PM
  #11  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by Sniper_X
"it is a little over 2" longer because the AT is longer than the MT"

Uhh that would make one or the other SHORTER... not longer.

Is this a typo?
Eric Henry "...I did notice the driveshaft for the 5-speed was quite a bit longer."

Evil Aviator "Yes, it is a little over 2" longer because the AT is longer than the MT."

I don't see why this is hard to follow. Hmm, you guys understand that the differential is the same size in both the AT and MT NA models, right? Therefore, the longer AT has a shorter driveshaft, and the shorter MT has a longer driveshaft, since the distance between the engine and differential is the same in both models.

For those students still confused... class please turn to page 8-2 in your textbook. Sniper X please read aloud for the class, and Mazdaspeed7 please come up to the chalkboard and solve for the difference of L1 (correctly this time). Hehehe.
http://www.iluvmyrx7.com/Technical_I...ller_shaft.pdf
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 10:56 PM
  #12  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
Evil, lets play "name that driveshaft" The one on the bottom is the original one off my 90 GTU.

The bottom one is the same diameter as the TII driveshaft, but has the n/a ends. Either someone at the mazda factory was smoking some shot at work, or this is from an an AUTO FC. And before you say its not OEM, the u-joints are staked in, just like all other OEM FC driveshafts.

Now where is this magic 2" you were talking about?
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 10:58 PM
  #13  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
I have had a thick and a narrow NA driveshaft. Auto ones are in fact a different length.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 11:25 PM
  #14  
rx7_ragtop's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, Texas, USA, Earth, Solar System...
Originally posted by mazdaspeed7
Evil, lets play "name that driveshaft" The one on the bottom is the original one off my 90 GTU.

The bottom one is the same diameter as the TII driveshaft, but has the n/a ends. Either someone at the mazda factory was smoking some shot at work, or this is from an an AUTO FC. And before you say its not OEM, the u-joints are staked in, just like all other OEM FC driveshafts.

Now where is this magic 2" you were talking about?
Different years would be my assumption. It's not an AUTO driveshaft, as the front yoke is different (like a TII yoke) on the auto driveshaft. The auto driveshaft is shorter.

Brad
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 11:40 PM
  #15  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Overall lengths and diameters from the FSM:

NA manual: 967mm, Ø57mm
NA auto: 913mm, Ø57mm
Turbo: 966mm, Ø75mm

So Mazda thinks the auto driveshaft is just over 2" shorter.
Reply
Old May 22, 2002 | 12:07 AM
  #16  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
I replaced my old GXL's thick one (I'm assuming it was 75mm) with a 57mm one out of an 86 Sport.
Reply
Old May 22, 2002 | 09:57 PM
  #17  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by mazdaspeed7
Now where is this magic 2" you were talking about?
A better question would be "where is the AT driveshaft that you were talking about?"

An AT driveshaft is labled with "M051".

RTFM, here is your "magic" 2 inches:

Last edited by Evil Aviator; May 22, 2002 at 10:02 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2002 | 10:01 PM
  #18  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
nm

Last edited by Felix Wankel; May 22, 2002 at 10:12 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2002 | 10:06 PM
  #19  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by Felix Wankel
*ahem*
Man, give me a break, the jpg had an extra directory in the link.
Reply
Old May 22, 2002 | 10:12 PM
  #20  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
At least we didn't use the _big.jpg one
Reply
Old May 22, 2002 | 10:27 PM
  #21  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
Alright, I was misinformed. When I got that driveshaft, i was told is was "most likely" from an auto, b/c the person had never seen one that before.

Was there any models the larger n/a ones came on, or was it just seemingly random?
Reply
Old May 23, 2002 | 08:24 PM
  #22  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by mazdaspeed7
Alright, I was misinformed. When I got that driveshaft, i was told is was "most likely" from an auto, b/c the person had never seen one that before.

Was there any models the larger n/a ones came on, or was it just seemingly random?
Yeah, that driveshaft "most likely" came from a piston-head. I've heard worse from the junkyard folks, though, such as the transmission that "most likely" came from an AT TII (in the US), LOL. Anyway, the important thing is that it fits on your car.

I don't know which NA models had the thicker driveshaft, but my friend's Sport has one, and it looks original.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joel(PA)
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
8
Oct 4, 2015 06:07 PM
Postman09
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
0
Sep 29, 2015 11:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.