2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

DP & MP questions (I read for hours first)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2002 | 07:42 PM
  #1  
Snrub's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario, Canada
DP & MP questions (I read for hours first)

First off, I know DP & MP questions are a dime a dozen, but I haven't been able to have my questions clarified.

1. If I went with a 2.5" DP & MP with my stock exhaust, should I expect a 2-4 psi boost increase or would the exhaust limit it substantially?

2. Would a wastegate port be prudent?

3. Can I get away with just an FCD?

4. Am I sort of wasting the DP & MP with the stock exhaust?

5. Fuel mods; Would I be safe enough with just a fuel pump rewire? To keep things cheap, I'd like to initially stay away from getting an S-AFC.

6. Would the mufflers get blown out?

Thanks for any and all responses.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2002 | 08:39 PM
  #2  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: DP & MP questions (I read for hours first)

1. The mufflers are very restictive, get rid of them.
2. Probably not until you ditch the stock mufflers
3. Yep
4. Yep
5. Depends on what boost you end up with, but probably
6. They probably already are, see 1.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2002 | 09:19 PM
  #3  
Snrub's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario, Canada
So basically if I went that route I would be wouldn't need anything too fancy , but I would be wasting my time? However if I get a catback, there's no reason not to get the full RB system which is more effective and cheaper (for the performance and sum of parts) but means fuel mods, large expense? This is why I posted.

Can anyone suggest a cost effective alternative to all or nothing? What about a DP alone?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2002 | 09:42 PM
  #4  
Six Rotors's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Pluto
There was a good article in Grassroots Motorsports(Nov88)which quoted data from Cartech.For the exhaust it went like this for exhaust restriction--
mufflers--2psi ie a good flowing muffler
main cat--3.5psi
front cat--5psi
Cartech did offer a turbo back system which reduced exhaust back pressure by over 80%.I don,t know anything about it size wise.
But using an RB 21/2 DP with factory cat and mufflers gains you a noticable improvent--I have this set up and only encounter fuel cut on a very cold day.
I have a similar set up on my other TII with a Dynomax cat back,and while it makes more noise there is no huge improvement over my other car(this could be because the turbo is not as good).
It was necessary to fabricate ~3 inch connectors to connect the DP to the main cat.I also ran with a RB 3inch turbo back system for a while but thought it too risky without fuel mods etc--but a lot more performance than my current set up.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bb6guy
Old School and Other Rotary
10
Oct 1, 2018 08:07 AM
RotaryBobby
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Aug 29, 2015 10:32 AM
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Aug 26, 2015 09:52 PM
bb6guy
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
Aug 12, 2015 03:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 PM.