2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Difference in Suspension from series IV to V

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-02, 09:42 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Spool Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tokyo/Texas
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Difference in Suspension from series IV to V

Just wondering what the difference in the Suspension is from the 86-88 Sereies IV's and the 89-91 Series V's is.
Old 04-15-02, 10:11 PM
  #2  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!

 
hypntyz7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: usa
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There are 3 suspension from 86-91(or, 4 if the 'vert has a different one but doubtful).

base(86-8 4 lug, 89-91 GTU)
GXL(86-90 and 91 coupe)
T2(87-91 t2 and 86-7 sport, 88 gtu, 89-90 GTUs)

The t2 suspensionm appears to sit lower, then the GXL almost as low, then the base sits pretty high.

Since I keep all these parts on hand, me and a friend experimented one day.

We used a 86-8 base suspension(stock on his car for comparison). IT was an 88 SE 5sp. We installed an AAS GXL suspension, a 89-91 GTU suspension(before we realized they were the same) and a t2 suspension.

None of the suspensions altered ride height at all. THe gxl suspension seemed mushier(surprise, shitty AAS struts) the t2 suspension was slightly stiffer but not much.

We figured out that the ride height is much more a function of the weight of the car(year and options) than the suspension. There was no more than 1/2" difference between any of them, an amount which could be attributed to differences in wear between struts.
Old 04-15-02, 11:27 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
rx-7fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: oakland Ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what did the GTUs have that made it handle so good
Old 04-15-02, 11:37 PM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Less weight



-Ted
Old 04-16-02, 01:46 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've heard that the T2 (GTU) suspension was made a lil bit stiffer for the S5 T2 and GTUs.
Old 05-28-10, 05:20 AM
  #6  
Warheads on foreheads!

iTrader: (8)
 
MIDNFauciUSN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Back in Jax!
Posts: 1,730
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
holy-way-to-bring-a-thread-back-from-the-dead-batman!


now that I'm facing this problem firsthand, is there a difference between coupe/vert (which i have) setups? trying to by a suspension setup today....
Old 05-28-10, 07:05 AM
  #7  
NASA-MW ST4

iTrader: (7)
 
farberio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norcal, Bay Area
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by MIDNFauciUSN
holy-way-to-bring-a-thread-back-from-the-dead-batman!


now that I'm facing this problem firsthand, is there a difference between coupe/vert (which i have) setups? trying to by a suspension setup today....
Wait, you have a coupe/vert? I have never heard of those....

Take a peek in a factory parts fiche and see if there are different numbers for coupe vs vert suspension.


http://foxed.ca/foxed/index.php?page=rx7manual
Old 05-28-10, 10:56 AM
  #8  
RIP Mark

iTrader: (2)
 
YaNi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
All S5's are 5 lug. The base model GTU still had single piston front/solid rear brakes but the front rotors were larger than the base S4.

The S4's had steel endlinks and you can get poly bushings for them. The S5's are cheap plastic.
Old 05-28-10, 11:42 AM
  #9  
FD Daily

iTrader: (26)
 
K-Tune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
also the front lower control arms are different...S4 has bolt-on ball joints, S5 are press in.
Old 05-28-10, 12:13 PM
  #10  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,217
Received 765 Likes on 507 Posts
Did they mellow out the DTSS in the S5 cars?

The rear of the S5 cars I have raced behaved much better than the S4 cars I have raced- but then age/mileage is another factor with the DTSS bushings...
Old 05-28-10, 12:33 PM
  #11  
NASA-MW ST4

iTrader: (7)
 
farberio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norcal, Bay Area
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The DTSS is the same from S4 to S5.
Old 05-28-10, 01:08 PM
  #12  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (1)
 
rx7racerca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Country, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,725
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by YaNi
The S4's had steel endlinks and you can get poly bushings for them. The S5's are cheap plastic.
Those "cheap plastic" anti-roll bar end links are also ball-jointed, making them more direct and effective.
I've never had plastic endlinks fail on my S5 7, despite 11 years of regular autocross and track use, but I've had a number of metal end links fail (including ones from a rear bar of an S4)- usually due to rust, or the link rubbing on the bar or control arm attachment point when stock rubber bushings deteriorated, necking down the link till it failed.
Lighter, more effective, and more durable = win.
Old 05-28-10, 01:41 PM
  #13  
Warheads on foreheads!

iTrader: (8)
 
MIDNFauciUSN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Back in Jax!
Posts: 1,730
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by farberio
Wait, you have a coupe/vert? I have never heard of those....

Take a peek in a factory parts fiche and see if there are different numbers for coupe vs vert suspension.


http://foxed.ca/foxed/index.php?page=rx7manual

i have a vert (turbo!)... and i needed to see if springs/shocks/struts matched what came on the coupe - which i havent had in 4 years...

if it was a joke, good on you!

and thanks for the link.
Old 05-28-10, 09:04 PM
  #14  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,832
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,846 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7racerca
Those "cheap plastic" anti-roll bar end links are also ball-jointed, making them more direct and effective.
I've never had plastic endlinks fail on my S5 7, despite 11 years of regular autocross and track use, but I've had a number of metal end links fail (including ones from a rear bar of an S4)- usually due to rust, or the link rubbing on the bar or control arm attachment point when stock rubber bushings deteriorated, necking down the link till it failed.
Lighter, more effective, and more durable = win.
true! the S4 links are usually bad
Old 05-29-10, 08:28 PM
  #15  
I have a rotary addiction

iTrader: (18)
 
NCross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Columbia, Tennessee
Posts: 4,815
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
s4 Sport had different suspension if I'm not mistaken.
Old 05-29-10, 09:58 PM
  #16  
Barrel Roll
iTrader: (1)
 
fstbckgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: HI
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NCross
s4 Sport had different suspension if I'm not mistaken.
well yeah...the beginning of this thread covers that fact quite well if im not mistaken. and by sport do you mean TII?
Old 05-30-10, 09:52 PM
  #17  
I have a rotary addiction

iTrader: (18)
 
NCross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Columbia, Tennessee
Posts: 4,815
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by fstbckgt
well yeah...the beginning of this thread covers that fact quite well if im not mistaken. and by sport do you mean TII?
By Sport I mean... Sport. It's a series 4 trim package.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
5
08-09-18 05:54 PM
Steven_McKinley
General Rotary Tech Support
12
09-05-15 10:48 AM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-03-15 07:10 PM



Quick Reply: Difference in Suspension from series IV to V



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.