2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

compression test results

Old Dec 20, 2002 | 08:59 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: stranded in a dump
Question compression test results

The Mazda dealership did a compression test on my '90 non-turbo today and they said the readings varied from 7.8 to 8.1. Am I right in assuming they did this in kg/cm2? Also, if my conversions to lbs/in2 are correct, that would put it at ~ 110-115 lbs/in2....is this good?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 09:08 PM
  #2  
racermike's Avatar
aheadau
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, Mo.
Good nuf.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 09:14 PM
  #3  
1FastT2's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Sinking Spring Pa.
Those readings sohnd pretty healthy to me.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 10:13 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: stranded in a dump
Thank guys! I appreciate the help.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 11:38 PM
  #5  
Project84's Avatar
Open up! Search Warrant!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 3
From: Kicking down doors in a neighborhood near you
115+ is like new, 100-115 is healthy, 90-100 is getting weak(1 year or less in most cases) below 90 could blow at any moment.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 06:34 AM
  #6  
dr0x's Avatar
pei > caek
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 0
From: Mars
Heh a friends car was showing 70, scary huh

115 is perfect
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 09:36 AM
  #7  
Roy James's Avatar
My cars louder than yours
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, GA
accually, i thought 120 was perfect.... **** if 115 is perfect, then i guess my old motor that had 120/120 was a freak motor.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 09:54 AM
  #8  
Erik's Avatar
Best of both worlds
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally posted by Roy James
accually, i thought 120 was perfect.... **** if 115 is perfect, then i guess my old motor that had 120/120 was a freak motor.
i'm a freak too, lol...when i got mine tested BOTH rotors were over 125psi! hehe

dual90s: looks like you've got a strong car
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 10:33 AM
  #9  
Spraintz's Avatar
Edmond Dantes
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
hehe, i got even 75's on both rotors and it still runs pretty good. just takes a while to get to redline.

175k miles
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 10:33 AM
  #10  
dr0x's Avatar
pei > caek
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 0
From: Mars
well, I meant 115 is perfect for an old motor.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 07:43 PM
  #11  
Mr. Eccentric's Avatar
Who owns the Chiefs?
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Dept 5, Ontario. Canada
Originally posted by Erik


i'm a freak too, lol...when i got mine tested BOTH rotors were over 125psi! hehe

dual90s: looks like you've got a strong car
Maybe you're engine is really just so close to carbon lock that your reading is great!
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 08:37 PM
  #12  
Erik's Avatar
Best of both worlds
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally posted by Mr. Eccentric


Maybe you're engine is really just so close to carbon lock that your reading is great!
lol...wrong

it was tested 2 years ago...still daily driven today and strong as ever...
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #13  
kjtar's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: near Tulsa, OK
Just had a car checked today. Following figures are front rotor (3 specs) and then rear rotor. Help deciphering them appreciated!

Front rotor: 7.7 8.0 7.7
Rear rotor: 9.4 8.6 8.8
(when multiplied by 14 equals
Front rotor:107.8 112 107.8
Rear rotor: 131.6 120.4 123.2

on an engine with about 20k miles on it. Whaddya think, especially in the discrepancy between the front and rear rotor? Make any difference?

Thanks,
Tom Reynolds
Hereford, AZ
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 11:34 PM
  #14  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 27
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Anything over 100 is decent...over 110 is pretty damn good, over 120 is like new. Most rebuilds are *lucky* to exceed 115psi. Only a new housing, new seal motor will exceed 115psi. 125psi is basically brand new with less than 10k miles. After 50k miles compression starts dropping rapidly, and by 100k compression can be down near 90.

BTW< a 10-15psi differential between front and rear is normal, though not desireable. More than that and you start to worry...too much of a discrepancy will cause uneven idling and poor mileage.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
BLK 93
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
Sep 9, 2015 10:56 AM
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Sep 8, 2015 05:36 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 5, 2015 08:57 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.