Compression Test Question
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Compression Test Question
Hi all,
been lurking around for a while. I did a few searches and couldn't find the answer so i'll ask and hope i don't get flamed This is for an 87 Turbo II motor.
I noticed in the factory service manual that the compression should be ~85psi give or take with the differential between the 2 rotors being less than 21psi. Yet, as I'm reading around, I notice alot of people saying that 90psi is borderline OK and that compression should be around 100-120psi or so. Could someone clarify this?
Mello
been lurking around for a while. I did a few searches and couldn't find the answer so i'll ask and hope i don't get flamed This is for an 87 Turbo II motor.
I noticed in the factory service manual that the compression should be ~85psi give or take with the differential between the 2 rotors being less than 21psi. Yet, as I'm reading around, I notice alot of people saying that 90psi is borderline OK and that compression should be around 100-120psi or so. Could someone clarify this?
Mello
#2
New factory compression- 120-125
Good rebuild- 110-120
still healthy- 90 and above
In trouble- below 90
those numbers are not set in stone. others might think a little differently.
Good rebuild- 110-120
still healthy- 90 and above
In trouble- below 90
those numbers are not set in stone. others might think a little differently.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
13bpower,
I understand ppl saying that 110-120psi is a good rebuild, but when you look at the Factory Service Manual (P.10-11 in the engine section for an 87) it says the compression should be approximately 85psi with a differential between the 2 chambers being no greater than 21psi, which is what is throwing me off.
Factory manual saying 85psi is 25-35psi lower than what people say on here with 110psi being a healthy engine which is a significant difference imho.
Mello
I understand ppl saying that 110-120psi is a good rebuild, but when you look at the Factory Service Manual (P.10-11 in the engine section for an 87) it says the compression should be approximately 85psi with a differential between the 2 chambers being no greater than 21psi, which is what is throwing me off.
Factory manual saying 85psi is 25-35psi lower than what people say on here with 110psi being a healthy engine which is a significant difference imho.
Mello
#4
Yeah, they are on crack. Mazda also tries to sell little pieces of plastic for $150.
My 120k mile original T2 engine has 100/98 compression for what it is worth. 85 is not good.
I think they mean that it should be at LEAST 85, even though they don't make it clear what they are saying.
My 120k mile original T2 engine has 100/98 compression for what it is worth. 85 is not good.
I think they mean that it should be at LEAST 85, even though they don't make it clear what they are saying.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok that's what i needed to know
so what do you think....
87 Turbo II
120k miles
Claimed rebuilt at 108k
slightly beat up interior
85psi front rotor, 89psi rear rotor (is that the term?)
No dents whatsoever on the body
$1200
thanks
Mello
so what do you think....
87 Turbo II
120k miles
Claimed rebuilt at 108k
slightly beat up interior
85psi front rotor, 89psi rear rotor (is that the term?)
No dents whatsoever on the body
$1200
thanks
Mello
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
13Bpower is right, honestly I don't know what Mazda means by that. Also you need to take into account the differences between each rotor, like his is 100/98. Since its only 2PSi difference, his engine is in good shape (not to mention high numbers). Good luck with the test!
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MelloBoy
ok that's what i needed to know
so what do you think....
87 Turbo II
120k miles
Claimed rebuilt at 108k
slightly beat up interior
85psi front rotor, 89psi rear rotor (is that the term?)
No dents whatsoever on the body
$1200
thanks
Mello
ok that's what i needed to know
so what do you think....
87 Turbo II
120k miles
Claimed rebuilt at 108k
slightly beat up interior
85psi front rotor, 89psi rear rotor (is that the term?)
No dents whatsoever on the body
$1200
thanks
Mello
#9
Originally posted by MelloBoy
ok that's what i needed to know
so what do you think....
87 Turbo II
120k miles
Claimed rebuilt at 108k
slightly beat up interior
85psi front rotor, 89psi rear rotor (is that the term?)
No dents whatsoever on the body
$1200
thanks
Mello
ok that's what i needed to know
so what do you think....
87 Turbo II
120k miles
Claimed rebuilt at 108k
slightly beat up interior
85psi front rotor, 89psi rear rotor (is that the term?)
No dents whatsoever on the body
$1200
thanks
Mello
There are 2 ways of doing a comp check. The mazda way with thier fancy checker that gives you #s like 6.7,6.9,6.7 front 6.5, 6.3,6.7 rear ..... and there is the way all us home mechanics do it. A regular comp gauge with the check valve removed.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i forgot to mention,
he says it was pinged a few times....
blown apex seals maybe? but the compression is pretty similar between both rotors. i was thinking of getting it while my 1jz swap on my supra was being done, then working on the FC as soon as my 1jz was done. (approx. 1-2 months before completion of my 1jz)
mello
he says it was pinged a few times....
blown apex seals maybe? but the compression is pretty similar between both rotors. i was thinking of getting it while my 1jz swap on my supra was being done, then working on the FC as soon as my 1jz was done. (approx. 1-2 months before completion of my 1jz)
mello
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
LunchboxSA22
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
37
10-26-15 10:53 AM