Compression Results For New Engine: Good? Bad? Input Please.
#1
Italo Disco
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: in the moment
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Compression Results For New Engine: Good? Bad? Input Please.
Specs .
Rebuild motor , new parts : Hurley apex , mazda sideseals , cornerseals .
Used but good housings , side plates , rotors etc .
Engine has been run 3 x 20 minutes only so far , test was on warm engine .
I know the compression wil improve during brake-in , but the difference between the front and rear housings seems very large ? , se pics . Also the rpm is somewhat low , but its an indication at the least .
Some inputs guys . ?
Front. Rpm 168
Chamber
1= 7.4 kg/cm - 105 Psi
2= 6.3 kg/cm - 89,6 Psi
3= 6.6 kg/cm - 93,87 Psi
Rear . Rpm 202 .
Chamber
1= 3 kg/cm - 42,7 Psi
2= 4.4 kg/cm - 62,6 Psi
3= 3.2 kg/cm - 45,5 Psi
Rebuild motor , new parts : Hurley apex , mazda sideseals , cornerseals .
Used but good housings , side plates , rotors etc .
Engine has been run 3 x 20 minutes only so far , test was on warm engine .
I know the compression wil improve during brake-in , but the difference between the front and rear housings seems very large ? , se pics . Also the rpm is somewhat low , but its an indication at the least .
Some inputs guys . ?
Front. Rpm 168
Chamber
1= 7.4 kg/cm - 105 Psi
2= 6.3 kg/cm - 89,6 Psi
3= 6.6 kg/cm - 93,87 Psi
Rear . Rpm 202 .
Chamber
1= 3 kg/cm - 42,7 Psi
2= 4.4 kg/cm - 62,6 Psi
3= 3.2 kg/cm - 45,5 Psi
#4
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (7)
First of all, you need to normalize those reading to the Mazda spec of 250 engine RPM and sea level. Your engine cranking speed is way too low like you say. Use the charts in the factory service manual to correct the readings so that you can compare them with Mazda recommended minimum acceptable compression. However, even after correcting the readings, I doubt that rotor #2 will be at or above the minimum. Fully break in the engine and test again.
#5
Italo Disco
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: in the moment
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay . The engine has now run aprox 2650 miles .
Broken in one should say.
Front. Rpm 246
Chamber
1= 6.5 kg/cm - 95,55 psi
2= 6.7 kg/cm - 98,49 psi
3= 6.7 kg/cm - 98,49 psi
Rear . Rpm 260
Chamber
1= 4.4 kg/cm - 64,68 psi
2= 4.4 kg/cm - 64,68 psi
3= 5.0 kg/cm - 73,50 psi
Its not the parts from top of the shelf ..that has been used we can say .
Broken in one should say.
Front. Rpm 246
Chamber
1= 6.5 kg/cm - 95,55 psi
2= 6.7 kg/cm - 98,49 psi
3= 6.7 kg/cm - 98,49 psi
Rear . Rpm 260
Chamber
1= 4.4 kg/cm - 64,68 psi
2= 4.4 kg/cm - 64,68 psi
3= 5.0 kg/cm - 73,50 psi
Its not the parts from top of the shelf ..that has been used we can say .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
08-11-15 03:47 PM