2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Compression ratios

Old Nov 25, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #1  
Jimmy2222's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 493
Likes: 1
From: NL, Canada
Compression ratios

I'm looking into the option of rebuilding with higher compression rotors and I remember seeing somewhere the compression ratio's for all the rotors but I can't seem to find it in search (sooo many results). Can anybody show me a link/list them off?

Also, anybody know the "danger" level for boost on N/A rotors (SX?)?

Thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 05:29 PM
  #2  
lonetlan's Avatar
Too Many Questions
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: Claremore, Oklahoma
S5 N/A rotors have a high compression.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 05:42 PM
  #3  
Jimmy2222's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 493
Likes: 1
From: NL, Canada
I know, but I'm looking for numbers.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 06:00 PM
  #4  
beefhole's Avatar
Boosted. I got BLOWN!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
The FAQ...

But I can tell you here, 9.7:1 on S5
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 06:06 PM
  #5  
KhanArtisT's Avatar
Former FC enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
S4 na: 9.4:1
s5 na: 9.7:1
s4 tii: 8.5:1
s5 tii: 9.0:1
FD3S: 9.0:1

I don't know first gens though.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 06:46 PM
  #6  
bumpstart's Avatar
talking head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 15
From: Perth, WA, OZ
74-78 13b = 9.2 : 1
74- 12a= 9.4 : 1
84-85 13b GSL-SE RESI engine = 9.4 : 1


personally,, having done this more than just a couple of times
the 9.7 will have practical limits in boost ,, with boosts over 10 psi needing quite significant retard ( fuel= aussie 98 RON, equiv to your 92 MON )

9.7 rotors are the lightest,, but also the thinnest and weakest in combustion face
- unless careful will be prone to detonation ,, and denting of rotor flanks


9.4 rotors however ( s4 NA ) are nearly as light ,, but without the compromise in rotor face strength,, and without the drastic retard above 10 psi

-- currently am daily driving a boosted s5 NA block using NA s4 ( 9.4 ) rotors and balance weights
( albiet on propane )
( at 12 psi,, with no hint of det )

and i think out of all the combos of rotors i have used with similar plate/port
this is the best evolution/ combination without compromises
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #7  
Jimmy2222's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 493
Likes: 1
From: NL, Canada
Alright, thanks for the help guys, much appreciated.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodreamz22
General Rotary Tech Support
28
Nov 10, 2023 11:08 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM.