2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Compression ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-09, 05:03 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Jimmy2222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NL, Canada
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Compression ratios

I'm looking into the option of rebuilding with higher compression rotors and I remember seeing somewhere the compression ratio's for all the rotors but I can't seem to find it in search (sooo many results). Can anybody show me a link/list them off?

Also, anybody know the "danger" level for boost on N/A rotors (SX?)?

Thanks.
Old 11-25-09, 05:29 PM
  #2  
Too Many Questions
 
lonetlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Claremore, Oklahoma
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S5 N/A rotors have a high compression.
Old 11-25-09, 05:42 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Jimmy2222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NL, Canada
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know, but I'm looking for numbers.
Old 11-25-09, 06:00 PM
  #4  
Boosted. I got BLOWN!!!

iTrader: (29)
 
beefhole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The FAQ...

But I can tell you here, 9.7:1 on S5
Old 11-25-09, 06:06 PM
  #5  
Former FC enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
KhanArtisT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,841
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S4 na: 9.4:1
s5 na: 9.7:1
s4 tii: 8.5:1
s5 tii: 9.0:1
FD3S: 9.0:1

I don't know first gens though.
Old 11-25-09, 06:46 PM
  #6  
talking head

 
bumpstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Perth, WA, OZ
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
74-78 13b = 9.2 : 1
74- 12a= 9.4 : 1
84-85 13b GSL-SE RESI engine = 9.4 : 1


personally,, having done this more than just a couple of times
the 9.7 will have practical limits in boost ,, with boosts over 10 psi needing quite significant retard ( fuel= aussie 98 RON, equiv to your 92 MON )

9.7 rotors are the lightest,, but also the thinnest and weakest in combustion face
- unless careful will be prone to detonation ,, and denting of rotor flanks


9.4 rotors however ( s4 NA ) are nearly as light ,, but without the compromise in rotor face strength,, and without the drastic retard above 10 psi

-- currently am daily driving a boosted s5 NA block using NA s4 ( 9.4 ) rotors and balance weights
( albiet on propane )
( at 12 psi,, with no hint of det )

and i think out of all the combos of rotors i have used with similar plate/port
this is the best evolution/ combination without compromises
Old 11-25-09, 07:27 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Jimmy2222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NL, Canada
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Alright, thanks for the help guys, much appreciated.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodreamz22
General Rotary Tech Support
28
11-10-23 11:08 AM



Quick Reply: Compression ratios



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 AM.