2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Charcoal Canister needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #1  
rx7 punk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Allentown Pa
Charcoal Canister needed?

Im doing another v8 swap on one of my 7's, I was wondering if the charcoal canister is needed for the brakes or anything, I know its needed to vent exhaust fumes, is there anything Im over looking before I chuck it?

Last edited by rx7 punk; Apr 1, 2005 at 08:12 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 08:14 PM
  #2  
Sir Rupert Hobo's Avatar
seven-less
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
From: city of houston.... y0!
no, you can toss it. it's ugly anyways.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #3  
xtremeskier97's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Bossier City, LA
OMG!!!!! I think people are blind and/or illiterate not to see this SAME FREAKING THING ASKED YESTERDAY!!!!!!

MY GOD....SEARCH DAMNIT!!!!!

https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/charcoal-canister-410152/

Here it is since you are too lazy to search.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #4  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Sir Rupert Hobo
no, you can toss it. it's ugly anyways.
This is very bad advice. Without the canister, where do you vent your fuel tank SAFELY?

Leave the canister. If you find it ugly, chrome or paint it, or make a nice cover. It's not hard to plumb it into your engine as all you need is a vacuum source and check valve. All this is coverd in the Factory Service and Haynes manual.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #5  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
o snap. i just capped mine steel hoses off. lol. oops.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 03:02 PM
  #6  
Sir Rupert Hobo's Avatar
seven-less
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
From: city of houston.... y0!
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
This is very bad advice. Without the canister, where do you vent your fuel tank SAFELY?

Leave the canister. If you find it ugly, chrome or paint it, or make a nice cover. It's not hard to plumb it into your engine as all you need is a vacuum source and check valve. All this is coverd in the Factory Service and Haynes manual.
aaron, i see no reason why he couldn't do it. many people are running without one with no problems. if he's doing a V8 swap, he's probably not worried about emissions anyways.

it is my OPINION, that you really don't need one. but that's just me. if he wants to be a little bit on the safe side, then by all means keep it.

also, i DO plan on rigging something up, as well as anyone that removes it should.

Last edited by Sir Rupert Hobo; Apr 2, 2005 at 03:05 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 04:04 PM
  #7  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,116
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
I removed mine with no problems, I just routed the line back under the car so the fumes aren't in the engine bay.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2005 | 10:37 AM
  #8  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
I just think it's bad advice to tell someone to remove a necessary part of their car. There's a reason that most every car on the road has a fuel tank vapour system. During filling and hot summer days, the tank builds up pressure which must be properly vented. Removal of the vapour system will gain you nothing, and the charcoal canister weighs all of 1 LB.

Venting fuel vapour into the open air ANYWHERE is just stupid.

Capping the line isn't a good idea either, because that pressure will build up in the tank and CAN cause fuel spray when you remove the cap for filling.

There is absolutely NO GOOD REASON to remove the canister. I find that most people remove these components for stupid reasons, the most often one being that they do not understand how the system works.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 12:46 AM
  #9  
Zenki FC's Avatar
ghetto engineer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Co. springs
gas milage went to hell on mine when i removed it so i just put it back on. Better safe than sorry!
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 12:50 AM
  #10  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
One of the points of it, from what I can tell, is more because no vapor (oil or gas) can be vented to the atmosphere, they all must be sent back into the engine to be burnt off. The charcoal canister, I think, also has a failsafe to dump fumes straight out the bottom if it's full/broken right?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 12:56 AM
  #11  
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Millville, NJ
Vent it at the cap or use the charcoal canistor. You will evaporate more gas without a canistor though. I've lost about 1/8th of a tank in 3 months
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
David Hayes
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
13
Sep 5, 2022 12:45 PM
runner83
1st Gen General Discussion
16
Aug 26, 2015 05:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.