2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

carbs on a N/A 13b

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 05:12 PM
  #1  
gear_grinder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Don't hate my V8
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: Cornfield, Indiana
carbs on a N/A 13b

my friend has a 1986 N/A RX-7 and wanted to know if a 12A manifold w/carbs would fit on the N/A 13B? and if anyone Knows were he can get a carb setup for a s4 13b n/a please post thread

peace out
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 05:14 PM
  #2  
Alex6969's Avatar
The Silver Bullet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City/Springfield, MO
the ports won't match up, 12a's are 4 port and na 13bs are 6 port. I think mazdatrix sells the manifolds
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 05:15 PM
  #3  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
no a 12A manifold won't fit a 13B, racing beat sells manifolds for carbed 13Bs but i dunno why he'd want to.
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 05:24 PM
  #4  
gear_grinder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Don't hate my V8
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: Cornfield, Indiana
carbs for racing and milk the most power out of a n/a street port motor
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #5  
NOPR's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by gear_grinder
carbs for racing and milk the most power out of a n/a street port motor
no, they dont. fuel injection will always make more power. only reason carb conversions have higher peak power is because they have a shorter aftermarket intake. a standalone and ITB set up would make more power.
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #6  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by NOPR
no, they dont. fuel injection will always make more power. only reason carb conversions have higher peak power is because they have a shorter aftermarket intake. a standalone and ITB set up would make more power.
Yes they do.

The removal of the stock manifolds and elimination of the AFM will result in more power with porting. Stock NA manifolds are also terrible for 99% of porting. Carb's don't win compared to an aftermarket EMS and manifolds, but if the entire point is to gain more horsepower for cheap, then the carb isn't a half bad solution. If the owner is ready to give up alot of the conveinence involved in an EFI setup.
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 07:29 PM
  #7  
NOPR's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Jager
.....Carb's don't win compared to an aftermarket EMS and manifolds....
.........right........thats what i said........


carb setups for FC's arent exactly cheap, either. if you took the same carb manifold and attached individual throttle bodies instead of a carb and used a cheap standalone such as megasquirt you would get better results for around the same price.
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 07:49 PM
  #8  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by NOPR
.........right........thats what i said........


carb setups for FC's arent exactly cheap, either. if you took the same carb manifold and attached individual throttle bodies instead of a carb and used a cheap standalone such as megasquirt you would get better results for around the same price.
Christ, another one of these people. Read the entire sentence before you post.

A good carb setup can cost only $800 dollars installed in a car by nearly any shop (considering a carb doesn't take lot of mechanical knowledge to install and there is ALWAYS someone that can tune it locally). Look at a good EMS (Microtech $800ish) and the only off the shelf aftermarket throttle body (Tweakit $600ish) (I'm not counting the one that never has proof of existence other then by the seller of the products) and the Holley manifold ($250) that is needed to install it. Let's add in injectors from a TII ($50 or so x 4 = $200) and you have yourself a VERY expensive NA project. Let's factor in a wideband and dyno time for both ($50 per run) which just adds to the cost

And I don't really advertise Megasquirt, it's still unproven to me (sorry MuThaiboxer). I haven't seen or heard of anyone making great power with it or really anything other then heresay. The only personal experience I have had weren't that great. But still it DOES come out more expensive. BTW, can you use any EMS that comes along even? I know that carb tuning is about one of the most universal things. Anyone can tune one locally.

But for the limited streetable (it's subjective) power potential out of an NA, a CARB isn't the worst idea. That and everyone that doesn't have $600 dollars worth of cash to dump into just throttle bodies.

Finally, just read my quote in the signature.

Last edited by Jager; Jul 9, 2006 at 07:51 PM.
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #9  
speed_monkey's Avatar
affen
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Why do you need a new TB and all that crap with a decent standalone?? Tune it, get rid of the AFM, make a true CAI and call it a day.

EFI > carb

/thread
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 09:06 PM
  #10  
DeclareYrWar's Avatar
Miss_My_Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
how many times is everybody on this forum going to have this same damn argument haha. it never gets solved. nobody is ever going to give in. each side has their points and its just gonna go back and forth forever. if you want to build urself a good n/a motor just go here and read: https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-gen-archive-72/how-make-beefy-n-need-your-recommendations-31410/ end of story. enough with this carb/efi debate. its old
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #11  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Great, another carburetor vs. EFI debate. It's not like this has not been rehashed 10,000 times or anything.

Still, I think I should contribute. So here goes:

Thread closed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
heywier427
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
2
Sep 11, 2015 04:49 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.